Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamWhat are the most reliable hard drives and SSDs to buy?
If reliability is the priority, buy by product class, not just brand. My short list as of June 2026 would be:
| Use case | Most reliable families to consider |
|---|---|
| NAS / home server HDD | WD Red Plus / Red Pro, Seagate IronWolf Pro, Toshiba N300 / N300 Pro |
| Enterprise / maximum-duty HDD | WD Ultrastar / Gold, Seagate Exos, Toshiba MG series |
| Desktop bulk HDD | WD Black, Toshiba X300 Pro, higher-end Seagate desktop/NAS/enterprise models |
| SATA SSD | Samsung 870 EVO, Crucial MX500, Samsung 870 QVO only for mostly-read / bulk use |
| High-reliability NVMe SSD | Samsung 990 Pro, WD Black SN850X, Crucial T500, SK hynix Platinum P41, Solidigm P44 Pro / enterprise Solidigm models |
| Portable external SSD | Samsung T7/T9, Crucial X9/X10 Pro, WD/SanDisk only if firmware/current batch is verified |
For HDDs, the best public large-scale evidence still comes from Backblaze. Their 2025 report analyzed 344,196 hard drives across 30 models and found an overall 1.36% annualized failure rate, down from 1.55% in 2024. The lowest-failure-count models in that fleet included Seagate 12 TB/14 TB/16 TB enterprise models, a Toshiba 16 TB MG model, and a WDC 26 TB model, although Backblaze correctly warns that very new models have limited statistical weight. (backblaze.com)
For SSDs, there is less public fleet-scale model-by-model data than for HDDs. Still, reliability-oriented choices are usually TLC NAND, good controller/firmware, DRAM cache for heavy workloads, 5-year warranty, and a reputable vendor. Tom’s Hardware’s current 2026 SSD recommendations still place the Samsung 990 Pro and WD Black SN850X at the top of the general M.2 SSD category, with the Crucial T500 highlighted as a strong high-capacity Gen4 alternative. (tomshardware.com)
There is no single “most reliable drive” for every situation. A drive that is excellent in a desktop can be a poor choice in a NAS, and a fast consumer NVMe SSD can be unsuitable for database logging or write-heavy workstation scratch use.
Reliability depends mainly on:
The engineering reality is simple: all drives fail. Backblaze’s 2025 HDD report explicitly notes that no model had zero failures in their annual dataset. (backblaze.com)
For a NAS, I would prioritize:
WD Red Plus
WD Red Pro
Seagate IronWolf Pro
Toshiba N300 / N300 Pro
My practical pick:
For maximum mechanical reliability, buy enterprise drives:
These are built for higher duty cycles, higher workload ratings, larger arrays, and vibration-controlled environments. Backblaze’s fleet is heavily enterprise/data-center oriented, and several of the low-failure-count models in the 2025 report were enterprise-class Seagate, Toshiba MG, and WDC/Ultrastar-family models. (backblaze.com)
Tradeoff: enterprise HDDs can be louder and run warmer than consumer drives. They are excellent for reliability but not always ideal for a quiet desktop.
For internal desktop bulk storage:
I would avoid the cheapest consumer HDDs for important data unless they are only one copy in a backup set. For desktop storage, a NAS or enterprise drive is often a better reliability choice than a bargain desktop drive.
SATA SSDs are mature and very reliable when bought from reputable brands.
Best choices:
Samsung 870 EVO
Crucial MX500
Samsung 870 QVO
My practical pick:
For a system drive, workstation drive, or gaming drive, I would buy one of these:
| SSD | Why it is a strong reliability-oriented choice |
|---|---|
| Samsung 990 Pro | High-end PCIe 4.0, strong controller/NAND integration, 5-year or TBW-limited warranty; Samsung lists up to 7,450/6,900 MB/s sequential read/write for the line. (semiconductor.samsung.com) |
| WD Black SN850X | Mature high-end Gen4 drive; strong real-world reputation; good gaming/workstation choice. |
| Crucial T500 | Strong Gen4 TLC drive; Tom’s Hardware highlights it as a good 4 TB alternative and notes that it retains DRAM while being more power-efficient than the older T700. (tomshardware.com) |
| SK hynix Platinum P41 | Efficient, high-end TLC Gen4 drive; excellent for laptops and desktops. |
| Solidigm P44 Pro | Closely related to SK hynix technology; strong high-end consumer/prosumer option. |
| Samsung 970 EVO Plus | Older PCIe 3.0 model, but very mature and still a good reliability pick for systems that do not need Gen4 speed. |
Correction to a common mistake:
The SK hynix Gold P31 is the well-known PCIe Gen3 drive. The SK hynix Platinum P41 is PCIe Gen4.
Several 2025–2026 trends matter when buying storage now:
For reliability and predictable performance, especially in NAS/RAID:
SMR is not automatically “bad,” but it is poor for workloads involving random rewrites or rebuilds. It can stall badly during heavy write activity.
For SSDs:
| NAND type | Reliability / endurance | Best use |
|---|---|---|
| SLC | Best, but mostly enterprise/cache use now | Industrial / cache |
| MLC | Excellent, now uncommon in consumer drives | Older premium SSDs |
| TLC | Best current consumer balance | OS, games, workstations |
| QLC | Lower endurance, cheaper per TB | Read-heavy bulk storage |
For a primary drive, I prefer TLC SSDs. For bulk game libraries or read-mostly storage, QLC can be acceptable.
For a main OS or workstation SSD, prefer:
DRAM-less SSDs can be fine for light laptops and budget builds, but I would not choose them for reliability-critical or write-heavy use.
1. Main PC / workstation SSD
2. Older SATA system
3. Home NAS
4. Server / ZFS / serious storage
5. External backup
smartctl, badblocks, fioThe safest reliability-oriented choices are:
But the best reliability strategy is still: buy the right drive class, avoid SMR for NAS, prefer TLC for main SSDs, keep firmware updated, monitor SMART, keep drives cool, and maintain 3-2-1 backups.