User question
How to add custom ota key to OpenBK7231 OTA RBL file ?
Artificial Intelligence Response
Direct answer to the question
- In stock OpenBeken (OpenBK7231), there is no supported “custom OTA key” field you can add to an .rbl and have the firmware enforce it. OpenBeken accepts any correctly‑formed Beken .rbl for the right chipset and validates it by header/CRC; the browser UI used to do only superficial filename checks. If you need key‑based authenticity, you must fork OpenBeken and add your own signing/encryption on both the packer side and in the device’s OTA handler, then install that modified firmware once over UART. (docs.libretiny.eu)
- Practical implication: you can’t “just put a key” into an .rbl and have stock OpenBeken verify it. You must implement and deploy a matching verification scheme.
Key points
- .rbl is the standard Beken OTA container used by OBK; the web UI drag‑and‑drop (and the /api/ota endpoint) accept a valid .rbl for BK7231T/N. (docs.libretiny.eu)
- Official firmware does not enforce a secret key/signature; earlier “rejections” were client‑side checks in the web wrapper (not in the device). (reddit.com)
- The .rbl file is generated by the Beken packager; you can also reconstruct .rbls with bk7231tools, which shows the format is a container with header and CRC. (elektroda.com)
Detailed problem analysis
- What .rbl is: For BK7231, OTA payloads are wrapped by a Beken packager into an .rbl container that carries header fields (magic, lengths, CRCs, version, etc.) and the payload. OpenBeken uses that standard Beken OTA container. (elektroda.com)
- What OBK actually checks: Current OpenBeken builds accept a valid .rbl for the target (BK7231T vs BK7231N) and rely on header/CRC to decide if the file is well‑formed, not on a cryptographic key. Any “invalid file selected” messages many users saw were transient checks in the open‑source web wrapper (chipset/file‑name guards), not cryptographic enforcement in the firmware. The device can even be updated by POSTing the .rbl directly to /api/ota, bypassing the UI check. (reddit.com)
- Why you can’t “add a key” into the .rbl: The stock boot/OTA path in OBK does not parse or enforce a user‑defined secret in the .rbl header; even if you stuffed bytes into unused header fields, the firmware would ignore them. To require a key, the validation logic must be added in firmware (before accepting the update) and a matching packer must produce an authenticated/encrypted artifact.
- Two viable security models if you need a “custom key”:
1) Signature only (recommended): Append or embed an HMAC‑SHA256 (or ECDSA) signature over the .rbl header+payload. Device verifies signature using a product key stored in code/flash before it proceeds to write/activate the update. No changes to the ciphertext/CRC ordering are needed; you just add a TLV or a trailer and check it before flashing.
2) Encryption + optional signature: Encrypt the payload (e.g., AES‑CTR/CBC with IV in header) in your packer and decrypt in the device before writing or at install time. If you encrypt, you should still add a signature or at least an HMAC to prevent malleability; and you must be consistent with CRC calculation order (usually CRC over ciphertext if you keep the stock header CRC semantics).
- One‑time deployment requirement: Because stock OBK doesn’t know your key, your first secure build (with key verification code) must be installed by UART/SPI. All further updates can be OTA using your signed/encrypted .rbls.
Current information and trends
- As of mid‑January 2026 (latest tag 1.18.247 dated Jan 15, 2026), OpenBeken still distributes OTA images as .rbl and documents drag‑and‑drop OTA for BK7231. There is no announcement of a built‑in signature/key gate for .rbl acceptance. (github.com)
- The LibreTiny docs and multiple community threads consistently describe OBK OTA as “standard Beken .rbl,” with web‑side filename checks that have been relaxed/removed; direct POST to /api/ota remains possible. (docs.libretiny.eu)
- Tools like bk7231tools can reconstruct/emit .rbls, reinforcing that the format is a generic Beken container rather than an OBK‑specific, key‑bound artifact. (github.com)
Supporting explanations and details
Technical outline to add your own OTA key enforcement (signature model)
- Where to hook in firmware:
- HTTP OTA endpoint handler (the code that processes /api/ota uploads) – add a step that computes HMAC/ECDSA verification on the uploaded buffer before writing to the OTA slot. If verification fails, abort. The web wrapper remains unchanged.
- Boot‑time swap/activation logic (if present) usually only checks CRC; leave it as is because you will have rejected bad images earlier.
- Artifact format (robust, backward‑compatible):
- Keep the standard .rbl header and payload exactly as the Beken packager generates (so CRCs remain valid).
- Add a small signed “descriptor” TLV after the .rbl payload or place a signature blob in an agreed, unused header extension area your firmware understands.
- Fields to include in the signature input: .rbl header (sans CRC field if you prefer), ciphertext/plaintext payload (be consistent), firmware version, and chipset tag. This prevents cross‑chip flashing and downgrade attacks.
- Key handling:
- Use a per‑product HMAC key compiled into your secure build, or store it in a reserved flash page protected by your update flow. Never ship the key in scripts or public repos.
- Minimal packer change:
- Post‑process the stock .rbl (produced by the Beken packager) with a small Python tool that computes HMAC‑SHA256 over the chosen input and appends a TLV like:
- type=0xF0 (“SIG”), length=32, value=HMAC. On device, locate 0xF0 TLV and verify.
Alternative encryption model
- Encrypt the payload with AES‑CTR/CBC using a per‑product key; store the IV in a custom TLV (type 0xF1). Compute CRC over ciphertext so the stock header remains consistent, and compute an HMAC over header+ciphertext. Device verifies HMAC first, then decrypts and programs. This provides confidentiality and integrity but requires a bit more work and careful buffer handling.
Ethical and legal aspects
- Keep private keys confidential; treat them as secrets equivalent to production credentials.
- Ensure that deploying a custom, locked‑down boot/update path does not violate local right‑to‑repair or warranty laws if you ship devices to customers.
- Document recovery options for end users; provide a UART unlock path in case OTA is bricked.
Practical guidelines
Implementation steps (signature model, recommended)
1) Build and flash once by UART a fork of OBK with:
- A small HMAC library (or use platform crypto).
- Added verification in the OTA upload path; abort if signature invalid.
- A compile‑time or flash‑stored per‑product HMAC key.
2) Modify your CI to:
- Build normal OBK .bin.
- Run the Beken packager to produce the standard .rbl.
- Run your “sign_rbl.py” to append the SIG TLV using your private key.
3) Distribution and update:
- Host only signed .rbls. Users can update via the web app drag‑and‑drop or via POST /api/ota; unsigned or tampered .rbls will be rejected by your firmware. (reddit.com)
4) Testing:
- Try a negative test: strip or corrupt the signature; confirm OTA rejects the file before any flash write.
- Check that version/downgrade rules are enforced in your verification code if you include version in the signed data.
Pitfalls to avoid
- Don’t change the way the standard header CRC is computed unless you also change device‑side parsing. A safe path is to leave the header and payload as produced by the packager and only add a trailer/TLV your firmware knows about. (elektroda.com)
- If you choose encryption, be explicit about padding/mode and the order of operations (Encrypt, then CRC and sign). Mismatched ordering causes install failures.
Possible disclaimers or additional notes
- Some vendor firmwares on BK7231 families use their own AES “coeff/key” schemes, but that is unrelated to OpenBeken’s acceptance of .rbl. You are implementing your own scheme if you need keys. (elektroda.com)
- Community guides that mention “web panel checks” refer to client‑side filename/chipset guards in the web app, not to cryptographic validations in the device. Those guards can be bypassed by posting to /api/ota, which is why adding a real signature in firmware is the only robust solution. (reddit.com)
Suggestions for further research
- Study the .rbl generation flow in your build logs and scripts (“beken packager … generate ota file … .rbl”) to understand where to integrate the signing step. (elektroda.com)
- Review bk7231tools’ handling of .rbl to see practical examples of header semantics and CRCs; it can reconstruct .rbls from dumps. (github.com)
- If you need cross‑ecosystem OTA migration (e.g., LibreTiny/ESPHome <-> OBK), consult the LibreTiny “OTA openbeken” notes for format and naming expectations. (docs.libretiny.eu)
Brief summary
- Stock OpenBeken does not support embedding/enforcing a “custom OTA key” in .rbl. The firmware validates .rbl structure/CRC, not a secret. To add key‑based security, fork OBK, add signature (or encryption+signature) verification in the OTA handler, and sign your .rbls in CI; deploy that modified firmware once by UART, then use secure OTA thereafter. This is the only reliable way to make a “custom OTA key” meaningful in the OpenBK7231 OTA process. (docs.libretiny.eu)
If you want, I can sketch a concrete sign_rbl.py and the minimal device‑side verification stub next, and point you to the places in the OBK source tree to insert them.
Disclaimer: The responses provided by artificial intelligence (language model) may be inaccurate and misleading. Elektroda is not responsible for the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the presented information. All responses should be verified by the user.
User question
How to extract OTA keys from stock firmware bk7231n ?
Artificial Intelligence Response
Direct answer to the question
Key steps:
Detailed problem analysis
Terminology clarified
Why the “bootloader‑dump” method works
Flash layout context
Current information and trends
Supporting explanations and details
What you can and cannot “extract”
Why wrong keys brick the boot
Ethical and legal aspects
Practical guidelines
Hardware setup
Full backup (recommended first step)
Extracting the 4×32‑bit flash‑encryption key 1) Try eFuse read: in ltchiptool, run “Get chip info” (GUI) or applicable CLI to read eFuse; if not protected, you’ll see four 32‑bit words. (docs.libretiny.eu) 2) If eFuse shows 00000000 or is unreadable, use bootloader‑dump:
Extracting Tuya credentials (uuid, auzKey/local_key)
Figuring out the OTA AES key (if the vendor bootloader requires it)
OTA conversion option (no solder)
Possible disclaimers or additional notes
Suggestions for further research
Brief summary
If you tell me which of the three you specifically need (flash‑encryption key, OTA AES key, or Tuya credentials), I can give an exact, command‑level procedure tailored to your device and dump.
User question
How to extract OTA keys from stock firmware image of bk7231n?
Artificial Intelligence Response
Direct answer to the question
Detailed problem analysis
What “OTA key” do you mean?
Why you can’t get keys from a stock app image:
What you can do with only a file:
Tooling overview
Ground truth about defaults and exceptions
Current information and trends
Supporting explanations and details
Ethical and legal aspects
Practical guidelines
If you have the device (recommended):
If you only have a stock image file:
Safety and best practices:
Possible disclaimers or additional notes
Suggestions for further research
Brief summary
If you tell me what you actually have (a full 2 MiB dump, a vendor .rbl, or only UART access) I can give you an exact command sequence for your case.