HDD vs SSD - we measured the power consumption.

Current measurement results in 5V and 12V branches of HDDs and SSDs.
Currently, there are miniature platforms with SATA connectors that allow you to build many interesting devices equipped with capacious and fast hard drives. We checked the current consumption of HDDs and SSDs, the information may be useful for you when building a home NAS or other device equipped with a SATA connector. The type of disk selected will affect both the power consumption of the device, but also the type of power supply required or the battery life (e.g. during a power outage or operating as a portable device). Regardless of whether you want to replace the disk in your laptop or use a hard disk in your design, it is worth choosing its type well.
In short, the results can be viewed in the video below or read more later in the article.
Accepted measurement principles.
To measure the current in the 5V and 12V branches, multimeters were used, set to measure direct current at the maximum range. By accepting a lower resolution and accuracy, we obtain a low internal resistance of the ammeter, thanks to which we have little interference with the hard disk (voltage drop). The voltages on the 5V and 12V rails were 5.13V and 12.15V, respectively.
The current consumption was measured for:
-state of inactivity (idle)
-state of sequential write
- sequential read status (seq read)
-search status / access time (seeking)
Measurements were made using the maximum capacity of the disk (eg checking the maximum read / write speed), the power consumption in "quieter" operation may be lower.
We will check whether the power consumed by the disk depends on the operations it performs. Current values have been rounded to two decimal places, power consumption values to one decimal place.
Additionally, we checked the shape of the current waveform in the supply branches with the use of an oscilloscope measuring the voltage drop across a 0.1? resistor, which was included in the tested branch. Channel sensitivity was set to 50mV / div for all measurements.
The test was selected from modern and older disk models, 2.5 "and 3.5", dedicated to NAS / RAID solutions, as well as popular "laptop" drives.
As far as possible, disks of one manufacturer / product lines of disks were selected for the test. The disks were provided by those interested in taking such a measurement, we do not have unlimited resources, also the disk models are somewhat random ...
HDD 3.5 "dedicated to work in SATA NL class RAID.
type of disk | test | result of the test | branch current 12V | branch current 5V | power | comments |
WD RE4 2TB | idle | - | 0.58A | 0.35A | 8.8W | starting current ~ 1.8A |
WD RE4 2TB | seq write | 125MB / s | 0.55A | 0.80A | 10.8W | |
WD RE4 2TB | seq read | 126MB / s | 0.55A | 0.75A | 10.5W | |
WD RE4 2TB | seeking | 12ms | 0.76A | 0.42A | 11.4W | |
WD RE 1TB | idle | - | 0.37A | 0.17A | 5.4W | prąd podczas startu ~1.8A |
WD RE 1TB | seq write | 128MB/s | 0.37A | 0.72A | 8.2W | |
WD RE 1TB | seq read | 120MB/s | 0.36A | 0.65A | 7.7W | |
WD RE 1TB | seeking | 12ms | 0.56A | 0.32A | 8.4W | |
Seagate ES.2 1TB | idle | - | 0.51A | 0.31A | 7.8W | dość stary model |
Seagate ES.2 1TB | seq write | 99MB/s | 0.51A | 0.75A | 10W | |
Seagate ES.2 1TB | seq read | 97MB/s | 0.51A | 0.68A | 9.7W | |
Seagate ES.2 1TB | seeking | 13ms | 0.51A | 0.4A | 8.2W |
In the case of HDD NL SATA, the power consumption fluctuates around 10W and may depend on the operations performed (it can reach 5W when idle). The higher the capacity, the higher the current consumption. Quite high power consumption during device start-up, in a matrix based on many disks, it is necessary to predict a greater demand for electricity at start-up and intensive work.
HDD dedicated to work in home NAS.
type of disk | test | result of the test | branch current 12V | branch current 5V | power | comments |
WD RED 1TB 3.5 " | idle | - | 0.17A | 0.25A | 3.4W | łagodny start |
WD RED 1TB 3.5" | seq write | 95MB/s | 0.16A | 0.46A | 4.3W | |
WD RED 1TB 3.5" | seq read | 96MB/s | 0.16A | 0.46A | 4.3W | |
WD RED 1TB 3.5" | seeking | 22ms | 0.26A | 0.28A | 4.6W | |
WD RED 750G 2.5" | idle | - | 0A | 0.3A | 1.5W | no current consumption in the 12V branch |
WD RED 750G 2.5 " | seq write | 95MB / s | 0A | 0.6A | 3.1W | |
WD RED 750G 2.5 " | seq read | 106MB / s | 0A | 0.5A | 2.6W | |
WD RED 750G 2.5 " | seeking | 17ms | 0A | 0.4A | 2.1W |
You can see optimization for low power consumption, drives in the 2.5 "version usually do not require a 12V power supply and consume less current.
Let's see what the shape of the current consumed while writing by the 3.5 "WD RED 1TB drive looks like.
5V bus:

You can see changes in the current consumption depending on the operations performed, the peak current reaches 0.8A, the minimum current is about 100mA. You can see the impact of the drive's operation on the current consumption in the 12V branch:

Read operations cause similar changes in current consumption (5V branch):

2.5 "" laptop "drives.
type of disk | test | result of the test | branch current 12V | branch current 5V | power | comments |
HGST 0.5T Travelstar Z7K500 | idle | - | 0A | 0.17A | 0.9W | 7200 rpm |
HGST 0.5T | seq write | 135MB / s | 0A | 0.6A | 3.1W | |
HGST 0.5T | seq read | 122MB/s | 0A | 0.58A | 3W | |
HGST 0.5T | seeking | 16ms | 0A | 0.5A | 2.6W | |
WD SCORPIO 320G | idle | - | 0A | 0.25A | 1.3W | |
WD SCORPIO 320G | seq write | 61MB/s | 0A | 0.57A | 2.9W | |
WD SCORPIO 320G | seq read | 54MB/s | 0A | 0.4A | 2.1W | |
WD SCORPIO 320G | seeking | 18ms | 0A | 0.38A | 2W | |
Seagate momentus 500GB | idle | - | 0A | 0.1A | 0.5W | |
Seagate momentus 500GB | seq write | 53MB/s | 0A | 0.45A | 2.3W | |
Seagate momentus 500GB | seq read | 101MB / s | 0A | 0.45A | 2.3W | |
Seagate momentus 500GB | seeking | 18ms | 0A | 0.4A | 2.1W |
2.5 "" laptop "drives show low power consumption and no power consumption in the 12V branch.
Shape of current consumption during recording:

and reading:

is characteristic of magnetic disks.
The current consumption can be reduced by giving the disk a stop command. It takes time for the drive to come to a running state from a stopped state.
Stopped power consumption:
type of disk | current consumption 12V | current consumption 5V | power |
WD RED 1TB 3.5 " | 0A | 0.17 | 0.9W |
WD RED 750GB 2.5 " | 0A | 0.09A | 0.5W |
HGST 500GB 2.5 " | 0A | 0.06A | 0.3W |
WD SCORPIO 320GB 2.5 " | 0A | 0.08A | 0.4W |
2.5 "SSD disks.
type of disk | test | result of the test | branch current 12V | branch current 5V | power | comments |
Kingston 64GB SSD | idle | - | 0A | 0.25A | 1.3W | starszy model większy prąd |
Kingston 64GB SSD | seq write | 92MB/s | 0A | 0.6A | 3.1W | |
Kingston 64GB SSD | seq read | 165MB/s | 0A | 0.5A | 2.6W | |
Kingston 64GB SSD | seeking | 0.2ms | 0A | 0.3A | 1.5W | |
Kingston 128GB SSD | idle | - | 0A | 0.07A | 0.4W | |
Kingston 128GB SSD | seq write | 104MB/s | 0A | 0.5A | 2.6W | |
Kingston 128GB SSD | seq read | 168MB/s | 0A | 0.4A | 2.1W | |
Kingston 128GB SSD | seeking | 0.2ms | 0A | 0.3A | 1.5W | |
GoodRAM 240GB SSD | idle | - | 0A | 0.01A | 0.1W | |
GoodRAM 240GB SSD | seq write | 198MB/s | 0A | 0.58A | 3W | |
GoodRAM 240GB SSD | seq read | 394MB/s | 0A | 0.47A | 2.4W | |
GoodRAM 240GB SSD | seeking | 0.08ms | 0A | 0.2A | 1W |
In the case of SSD drives, the visible advantage is the low power consumption during idle time (as well as short access time and high read and write speed).
SSD technology is advancing, capacity is increasing, power consumption is lowered, bandwidth is increasing, and access time is lowered.
The shape of the current in the 5V line when writing for the GoodRAM disk:

Shape of the current when reading:

Current cycles are faster than magnetic disks.
During the waiting state, you can see cyclical increases in power consumption (internal disk controller work, or maybe an internal pulse converter?):

Have you come across interesting experiences while selecting hard drives, maybe you will present the results of your own measurements?
Part II - More accurate measurements and comparison of SSD and HDD power consumption at lower than maximum write speeds.
Comments
The table is invisible on the black board style. [Read more]
So as it turns out, SSD is not so energy-saving in the active state ... [Read more]
Yes, the read speed of the search write and the lower power consumption leave no illusions as to what is better ... maybe the price and available capacity are not equal to the HDD, but on a daily basis... [Read more]
TomekxD in fact, the text of the tables is invisible when the forum style is black, I reported, we'll see what we can do. mdm150 everything is relative, SSDs at their maximum capacity consumed... [Read more]
I already got used to it, ctrl + a helps. [Read more]
I know that, but from the phone how? :) [Read more]
Why were the model designations not included in the test? For example, Hitachi / HGST uses the HTE and HTS designations, there is a fundamental difference here because the former are drives designed for... [Read more]
So what is the accuracy of the measurements? On a quick check meter UT58D + - 2% + 5c So 20A * 2% = + - 400mA + 5c Meter 1009 10 A * 1.6% + 4c = + - 160mA + 4c It seems to me that even without taking... [Read more]
It is not known for the end :D There should be a definition of this accuracy in the meter manual. If there was an accuracy class, it could be precisely defined. 2.0 would mean that the error limit does... [Read more]
Darkdarkman parameters given by me come from the manual of the gauges. [Read more]
I downloaded the manual - the accuracy is described as 2% indications . [Read more]
So in the case of UTD58 it is 2% of the reading + 5c. And 5c in this case is 50 mA? [Read more]
More like 5mA. [edit] - auto-patch. Yes, 50mA [Read more]
I don't understand the 5 least significant digits. UTD has 2 digits after the decimal point so I get 50 mA [Read more]
The HGST disk from the "laptop" group was provided as standard on a laptop and therefore it is the HTS series (standard S). As for the accuracy, the test assumed the achievement of differences in results... [Read more]
It's not like that. You do not write what you measured the voltage with. If you used the same methodology to measure the voltage, the measurement error for 12V resulting from the resolution of the... [Read more]
Exactly yes, in the case of voltage measurement, there were no technical limitations to apply the measurement method that guarantees the best accuracy available at the time of the test, which does not... [Read more]
Everything is nice just these gauges sucks. Both the UT58D and the Kyoritsu 1009 do not show the true RMS value (they are not TRMS). In addition, most, and basically all manufacturers provide data on... [Read more]
They don't suck that much :) the fact they do not have TrueRMS and this is a serious drawback, the "pictures" from the oscilloscope show the shape of the current changes, which cannot be obtained in... [Read more]