One of my colleagues drew my attention to the sentence from the previous post:
Darom wrote: These will be exactly the heat losses that we can potentially recover using the timer.
that it is not entirely true.
Well, yes, and he is actually right. But I just didn't want to complicate matters. So yeah. First of all, this is true if the temperature drop is quite small, e.g. 5 degrees C. Then we can assume that it is approximately linear - in fact it will be the exponential function / exp (-t / tau) / and that would have to be taken into account. But then, when these temperature drops were significantly greater.
Secondly. I assume that the user makes maximum use of the heated 140 liters. Well, because if it uses a small amount of water (for example, it consumes only 2 liters every day), the economy takes its toll here. And this regardless of whether it is with a timer or not, because why heat the remaining 138 liters (such an extreme case).
kisses
- GIFT-