logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Comparative Analysis: Stanley, Capral, Jager 50l Compressors - Efficiency, Price, Performance

piotrek power 38307 6
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17104209
    piotrek power
    Level 27  
    Hello all.

    I'm going to buy a 50l compressor, I think over Stanley 50 l 2.2kW 10 bar price on allegro 1197 PLN. Is this compressor worth the price? Performance given 356l / min but the test results rather something about 250l. ?

    For 2x cheaper you can buy Capral 50l 2.2kW 8bar price PLN 599, effective efficiency given 300l, I have not found anywhere filling tests.

    There is also Jager 50l 2.2 kW 8bar price PLN 719, effective efficiency administered at 240l / min. In tests on youtube I found that it has about 260 l / min

    I now have a 10-year-old 50L Kraft compressor, filling the cylinder with 0 to 8 bar in 4min 10sec.
    And unfortunately for a few years, a lot of oil takes.
    As it was new, I did not check performance but pumped much faster.
    I want to buy a compressor which after one year will not start taking oil and will not lose its efficiency.

    The compressor I use mainly for painting (touch up) and small parts of car bodies, chassis maintenance, sporadic pneumatic key, etc. I would like to buy a 50l compressor, in the future I plan to buy a larger 200-270l, but for now I need a 50l compressor to be mobile. Usually used from spring to autumn, it is not often used.

    Only I would like to buy a good compressor, which will be trouble-free, will not take oil, will not lose its performance immediately.

    It was a good idea, but unfortunately I do not see it anywhere else.
    I think about Stanley, but it's a bit expensive, but if it is worth the price, I would buy it, on the other hand, by half the cheaper Capral, if it were of similar quality, then why overpay. Or maybe some other company? Compressor 50l double piston.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 17104848
    piotrek power
    Level 27  
    I have followed this page, https://jaktozrobilemwgarazu.pl/rzeczywista-wydajnosc-kompresorow-opinie-uzytkownikow/

    The only problem is that there are no longer recommended and with good parameters compressors: mactek and jager especially those 100l.

    Jagera can be found on allegro, I found even 100l but it is no longer the same compressor as was recommended on the page in the link above.

    There is three piston version 100l 3kW 230 and 400V for 1399 PLN but he writes in the auction with a real capacity of 240l and the same seller can buy a two-piston 100l 230V jager for 1299 but with 1 compression stage 2.2kW engine but performance surprisingly higher because 280l / min .
    However, these are only the data of the seller, and I have not found such tests of these compressors.

    That's what I'm wondering, giving 1,200 for a 50L stanley, adding 100 PLN I can have a Jagger 2.2kW with an unknown until the end of the performance, probably similar to Stanley.

    If I wanted to start painting something with a gun that I do not yet have a Devilbiss FLG 5, it would come in handy with a proven and reliable performance, those 260-270 l / min.

    So for now, apart from these three 50s Stanley, Jager, Capral, I add Jager 100l 2,2kW 2 pistons 1 compression, but it's hard to believe that 3 piston with a stronger engine because 3kW would be slower to pump from the theoretically weaker?

    To find these Jagniki on the Allegro, you need to enter the jager compressor in the search engine and select to search also in the auction descriptions. Link to
    https://allegro.pl/listing?string=kompresor%2...s-base-relevance-floki-5-nga-hcp-aut-1-5-1003

    I reject the kraft dele, tagred compressors.
    There is also a 50l ripper on the Allegro for 640 PLN performance about 250l / min or 100l and 250l / min for 1100 PLN. By weight, the 50l ripper is almost 10kg lighter than Stanley so it does not bode well. Jager weighs similarly to Stanley (I mean 50s)
    Capral 50tka is the cheapest, but I can not find 50's performance tests.
    There are a lot of tests of 100l 230V 3.7Kw but different results are and the price is currently 1700 PLN and once it was available for 1200 so its rather rejected, yet problems at the start of the engine at 220V.
    However, as I mentioned at the beginning, I also want to maintain this efficiency so that the compressor does not lose it after a year and did not start to take oil after several dozen hours of work.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 17161463
    tomjed
    Level 28  
    Has a colleague acquired something and can share observations?
  • #5 17166326
    piotrek power
    Level 27  
    tomjed wrote:
    Has a colleague acquired something and can share observations?


    Yes, I purchased Jager 100V2
    But I'm not happy for much, here are the results:

    It leaves 0-8 bar 3 min 50sec: 208.7 l / min (+ 10% losses: 187.8l / min), and on the day-out 6-8bar: 1 min 2sec: 193,5 l / min (+ 10% start : 174.2 l / min).

    I gave back to complaints, I wonder if they will recognize them?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 17372100
    piotrek power
    Level 27  
    To sum up, the complaints, unfortunately, did not recognize, they sent the same equipment.

    But after issuing a negative comment the situation changed, immediately I had a phone call from the sales department and offered me new equipment, the courier delivered new equipment and took the old one.

    And now it's better:

    Exit 0-8 bar: 3 mins 10sec:, and at the end of the day 6-8bar: 0 min 47 sec (record: 42 sec, usually 47/48 sec)

    What can I say after 4 months of use - that the tank catches corrosion, as I drain the water it is red. The performance remains at the same level.
  • #7 18922397
    piotrek power
    Level 27  
    After 2 years, the performance was unchanged. Zero oil consumption. But there is a problem. A week ago I bought a stanley 50 l V2 what a second compressor for maintenance and support for this jager which is no longer in production and I have a problem with the Stanley. Takes the oil. I don't know if the new one hasn't arrived? I unscrewed these tubes from the cylinders from the distributor side and the two cylinders are equally in the oil in the middle? So I took the jager quickly, this is how I checked. I unscrewed the tubes and inside, like from a factory, copper is perfect, neither a drop nor a mist of oil. And what now ? Stanley's manual says he can take oil. But that much? The entire compressed air installation will collapse with oil and I wanted to combine it with a jager. Can a new one that has not run in take up oil? When I bought Jager, I did not check it this way, I do not know if it was new or it did not download anything there. But when deflating the air, I never saw oil even at the beginning. And Stanley worked 4 minutes, but the oil has not yet appeared in the tank. Then I would have completely collapsed but I was very concerned about the oily in the middle of the tubes here are aluminum. Not only is the more expensive compressor worse? When it takes oil, it will not be painted with it or connected to installations. The end cap screws on the side of the cylinder are so tightened that the hex key will jump and will not unscrew it. Even pneumatic. And how do I install the connector quickly? Is there any way to unscrew it? I do not want to heat with a burner or it will burn the paint And the new one is under warranty, I have 2 days

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the comparative analysis of three 50L compressors: Stanley, Capral, and Jager, focusing on their efficiency, price, and performance. The Stanley 50L compressor, priced at 1197 PLN, claims a performance of 356L/min but is reported to deliver around 250L/min in tests. The Capral 50L compressor is significantly cheaper at 599 PLN, with an effective efficiency of 300L/min, though no filling tests are available. The Jager 50L compressor, priced at 719 PLN, has an effective efficiency of 240L/min, with some tests indicating around 260L/min. Users express concerns about oil consumption and performance degradation over time, particularly with the Stanley model, which has been noted to take oil excessively. Comparisons of performance metrics and user experiences highlight the importance of reliability and efficiency in compressor selection for tasks such as painting and chassis maintenance.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT