Rzuuf wrote: Especially since the current before the circuit breaker is the same as after the circuit breaker.
In normal working condition yes. But not in an emergency.
lordpakernik wrote: Same.
The same (in the sense of methodology), but the protection against the conductor in question should be taken into account! I do not know any new regulations in this matter (if anyone knows, please complete), but according to PN-57/E-05022, the following conditions had to be taken into account in the use of protection at branches:
- cross-section of the branching cable (i.e. "behind the circuit-breaker" in the example described) not smaller than 3 consecutive standardized cross-sections from that supplying the switchgear,
- wires from the branch to the protective device must be protected against mechanical damage (in my opinion, the cover is the switchgear housing),
- the cable cannot pass through a room with an explosion hazard (here the switchgear is rather not built in such a room),
- the length of the section in non-industrial facilities cannot exceed 1m (in a small switchgear it is not a problem, in a large one not necessarily).
So to sum up, with a small switchgear in an apartment/house it is important to take into account the condition with cross-sections. If a 10 mm² wire enters the switchgear, you cannot use less than 2.5 mm² in front of "eSami" (subsequent cross-sections (6, 4 and 2.5), even if it is a lighting circuit, then 1.5 mm².
This cross-section must be converted to the same material for different cable materials). Of course, it may be that the previous protection is suitable for the section from which the branch is made - this must be checked when making the switchgear.