logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

2.5 square wire cross-section and a 20 A fuse - can it be used?

mateusz0081 84012 32
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 14610322
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    Hello.
    I want to connect a device that has a 20A current protection, only in the box I have a 16-amp fuse.
    I am asking for advice, because I do not know if there is a 1.5? cable on the 2.5? cross-section that goes to the box, and then I can change the fuse to 20A ??
    Distance from the fuse box on the wall approx. 8-10 m.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 14610380
    rtvserwisant
    Level 23  
    You cannot change the fuse to 20A, even the 16A fuse is too much because you have a 1.5 cable connected to the socket.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 14610408
    ciuqu
    Level 38  
    Apart from 1.5mm2 cables, the long-term load capacity of the sockets is 16A and protection greater than 16A should not be used.

    What is this device, what is its power or current, and what is your pre-meter protection?
  • #4 14610540
    haneb
    Level 24  
    rtvserwisant wrote:
    even the 16A ones are too much because you have a 1.5 cable connected to the socket
    16A is too much if the cable runs through an insulating wall.

    2.5 square wire cross-section and a 20 A fuse - can it be used?

    Ask the author what kind of cable it is, how many veins it is, how it is routed and in what.
  • #5 14610595
    kkas12
    Level 43  
    The basic question is: what device is it about and not going back to the stage of designing the installation.
    And the answer is the requirement for a separate circuit for loads exceeding 2kW.
  • #6 14611271
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    Thanks for the answers.
    The cables used are 3x 2.5 ? from the box to the box, while from the box to the socket 3x1.5? are located in the concrete wall and covered with plaster of paris.
    The device is a migomat welder, I do not know exactly what I will buy, but the welding current range is 30-200A.

    I would like to add that the section from the can to the socket with a 1.5? cable is 1.5 m, and in front of the can, as I wrote above, so do you think that it will be such a big threat if all the rest is pulled 2.5??

    Counter protection is 3x 25 A
  • #7 14611327
    kkas12
    Level 43  
    Dear friend, you want to force a satisfactory answer.
    Meanwhile, it looks like this receiver should be powered by a separate circuit, because receivers with a power of more than 2kW are supplied in this way.
    Also remember that the load of an ordinary socket is 16A, so you cannot protect it with 20A.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 14611334
    TWK
    Electrician specialist
    As colleagues wrote - the only output is a dedicated circuit for such a receiver. Cables laid from the switchgear to the appropriate socket. There's no other way.

    To protect 1.5 mm? wires, a rare 13 A circuit breaker can be used. For laying in the wall, the long-term current carrying capacity of such a wire is probably 14 or 14.5 A, and such protection allows for greater freedom of use of receivers than 10 A.
  • #9 14611439
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    Strong from the can the same 2.5 kw cable and according to the table it will be fine.
    Thank you for your help.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #11 14611478
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    Looking at the table, the cross section of 2.5 kw corresponds to the standard to be able to power such equipment.
    If I have misunderstood, please explain ...
  • #12 14611493
    kkas12
    Level 43  
    I explained everything to you (and not only me) in previous posts.
    The only problem is your minimalist approach with the maxim "Pole can".
    This is how you will bend and interpret the standards to suit you.
    You can afford a welder and it is a waste of money for the proper execution of the dedicated circuit so that its operation is safe.
  • #13 14611524
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    mateusz0081 wrote:
    Looking at the table, the cross section of 2.5 kw corresponds to the standard to be able to power such equipment.
    If I have misunderstood, please explain ...


    Another example where "I want it this way" is going to replace reliable knowledge. I wish you happiness and health.
  • #14 14611526
    haneb
    Level 24  
    TWK wrote:
    To protect 1.5 mm? wires, a rare 13 A circuit breaker can be used. For laying in the wall, the long-term current carrying capacity of such a wire is probably 14 or 14.5 A, and such protection allows for greater freedom of use of receivers than 10 A.
    For 1.5mm? and two loaded conductors, 15A in the thermal insulation wall and 21A in the standard wall.
  • #15 14611546
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    Actually, I look like this now and I'm sorry, the appropriate cross-section would be 4 mm sq.
    Are they perhaps lower than 3 mm sq?
  • #16 14611621
    pshemo13
    Level 10  
    mateusz0081 wrote:

    Are they perhaps lower than 3 mm sq?


    No.
  • #17 14611622
    Akrzy74
    Rest in Peace
    haneb wrote:
    16A is too much if the cable runs through an insulating wall.
    Ask the author what kind of cable it is, how many veins it is, how it is routed and in what.


    If a load capacity table is inserted, the source for verification should be provided to prevent such conclusions:
    mateusz0081 wrote:
    Looking at the table, the cross section of 2.5 kw corresponds to the standard to be able to power such equipment.
    If I have misunderstood, please explain ...

    Here is the load capacity table and a small comment -> Link

    To the question asked in the first post, my friend received an answer already in the 2nd and 3rd post! Further discussion is unnecessary.
  • #18 14611937
    haneb
    Level 24  
    Akrzy74 wrote:
    If a load capacity table is inserted, the source for verification should be provided to prevent such conclusions:
    The source is the PN-IEC 60364-5-523 standard after conversion to the design temperature for Poland of 25'C.
    The table provided by a colleague on that topic is for 3 loaded veins and a Mediterranean design temperature of 30'C.
  • #19 14612261
    Anonymous
    Anonymous  
  • #20 14612588
    mateusz0081
    Level 13  
    haneb wrote:
    TWK wrote:
    To protect 1.5 mm? wires, a rare 13 A circuit breaker can be used. For laying in the wall, the long-term current carrying capacity of such a wire is probably 14 or 14.5 A, and such protection allows for greater freedom of use of receivers than 10 A.
    For 1.5mm? and two loaded conductors, 15A in the thermal insulation wall and 21A in the standard wall.


    What do you mean, buddy, about an ordinary wall and a thermal insulation wall?
  • #21 14612760
    haneb
    Level 24  
    mateusz0081 wrote:
    What do you mean, buddy, about an ordinary wall and a thermal insulation wall?


    2.5 square wire cross-section and a 20 A fuse - can it be used?

    2.5 square wire cross-section and a 20 A fuse - can it be used?

    Plain wall - brick - method C
    Thermo insulating - it perceives heat worse, i.e. the cable heats up more - wooden, skeletonized with wool - method A
  • #22 14612818
    vodiczka
    Level 43  
    kkas12 wrote:
    Meanwhile, it looks like this receiver should be powered by a separate circuit, because receivers with a power of more than 2kW are supplied in this way.

    All or only permanently connected?
    What about a 2.4kW kettle, a 3.0kW portable fan heater, a 2.5kW vacuum cleaner?
  • #23 14612853
    TWK
    Electrician specialist
    An interesting list of materials can be found here: http://ise.pl/index.php?option=com_jfusion&It...file=viewtopic.php&f=16&t=6767&st=0&sk=t&sd=a If you do not know the material of the wall, it is safer to adopt the arrangement A.

    vodiczka wrote:
    2.5kW vacuum cleaner
    It is already forbidden to sell vacuum cleaners with a power of 2000 W. As for the rest - according to N SEP E 002 there should be a separate circuit, but there is little chance that an inventive housewife will not turn on these devices elsewhere.
  • #24 14612881
    Anonymous
    Anonymous  
  • #25 14612938
    vodiczka
    Level 43  
    TWK wrote:
    but there's a small chance the resourceful housewife won't turn on these devices elsewhere.
    It is not about an inventive hostess, but I did not notice that the manufacturer informs about such a recommendation in the manual. Anyway, as far as I can imagine a separate circuit for the kettle (usually it has its permanent place in the kitchen), this connection of the vacuum cleaner may be a problem.
  • #26 14613091
    sq3evp
    Level 37  
    vodiczka wrote:

    What about a 2.4kW kettle, a 3.0kW portable fan heater, a 2.5kW vacuum cleaner?


    The kettle does not work continuously, the fan heater should not work either (it has a thermostat that protects against overheating, but I have seen one without a thermostat), the vacuum cleaner does not work in a continuous cycle either.
  • #27 14613112
    vodiczka
    Level 43  
    sq3evp wrote:
    The kettle does not work continuously, neither should the fan heater (it has a thermostat that protects against overheating ...
    As for the kettle, iron and vacuum cleaner, we agree, but the protection of the fan heater against overheating does not serve to limit the time of its operation. Do not confuse the thermostat with overheating protection, even if it has a thermostat set at +18 and heats a large room with an initial temperature of +5, it must heat up for a long time. :cry: A properly designed fan heater (as long as there is no air inlet clogged with dust) can work for many hours and the protection will not work.
  • #28 14613233
    Xaveri
    Level 17  
    The welder also does not consume electricity (20A) continuously ...
  • #29 14613277
    Anonymous
    Anonymous  
  • #30 14613368
    sq3evp
    Level 37  
    Xaveri wrote:
    The welder also does not consume electricity (20A) continuously ...


    It does not charge, but the kettle is secured with a 16A fuse - the load is cos ? = 1, and the welder has cos ?

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the suitability of using a 2.5 mm² wire cross-section with a 20A fuse for a device, specifically a MIG welder, which may draw between 30-200A. Participants emphasize that a 16A fuse is appropriate for a 1.5 mm² cable, and using a 20A fuse is unsafe due to the risk of overheating and potential fire hazards. It is recommended to use a dedicated circuit for devices exceeding 2kW, and the importance of adhering to electrical standards is highlighted. The author clarifies that the wiring from the fuse box to the socket includes a 3x2.5 mm² cable, while the connection to the socket uses a 3x1.5 mm² cable, which raises concerns about the overall safety and compliance of the installation.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT