logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Advanced Search
logo elektroda

Apator Meter Reading Guide: Understanding kWh for Tariffs with Example Photos

kobietaxxx 74076 7
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
Report a violation of the law
| New topic
  • #1 15785039
    kobietaxxx
    Level 2  
    Posts: 4
    Rate: 30
    Board Language: polish
    Hello. How do you read the amount of kWh for a given tariff, I have photos of both tariffs, but I do not know which numbers to write down because I am doing it for the first time, will someone help?

    Apator Meter Reading Guide: Understanding kWh for Tariffs with Example Photos Apator Meter Reading Guide: Understanding kWh for Tariffs with Example Photos
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 15785137
    KlonAdam
    Level 12  
    Posts: 60
    Help: 2
    Rate: 17
    Board Language: polish
    Accepted standard:
    Code: text Expand Select all Copy to clipboard
    1.8.0 Zużycie energii ogółem
1.8.1 Zużycie energii w strefie dziennej
1.8.2 Zużycie energii w strefie nocnej i weekendowej


    Additionally, after indicating the phasor diagrams (these arrows) you have a power factor cos? to improve.

    There should be no reactive power consumption Q. You have an overcompensated network, ie capacitive loads in the installation are present in a significant number.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 15785256
    zbich70
    Level 43  
    Posts: 17116
    Help: 1164
    Rate: 6567
    Board Language: polish
    KlonAdam wrote:
    There should be no reactive power consumption Q.

    Why shouldn't it?
    If the supplier does not charge for Q (and does not charge for G and C1x tariffs), then what to worry about?
  • #4 15785258
    kobietaxxx
    Level 2  
    Posts: 4
    Rate: 30
    Board Language: polish
    I know what these codes mean, I don't know what values to write down.
    1.8.1 is 755.0 kwh? . and at 1.8.2 - 1377.8kwh? Does it work with these zeros? That's what I mean.
  • Helpful post
    #5 15785265
    zbich70
    Level 43  
    Posts: 17116
    Help: 1164
    Rate: 6567
    Board Language: polish
    kobietaxxx wrote:
    1.8.1 is 755.0 kwh? . and at 1.8.2 - 1377.8kwh?

    Yes.
    Leading zeros do not matter. Decimal kWh as well.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 15785273
    kobietaxxx
    Level 2  
    Posts: 4
    Rate: 30
    Board Language: polish
    So 755kwh and 1378 kWh round off?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #7 15785282
    zbich70
    Level 43  
    Posts: 17116
    Help: 1164
    Rate: 6567
    Board Language: polish
    kobietaxxx wrote:
    So 755kwh and 1378 kWh round off?

    Yes.

    PS. Watts in kilowatt hours should be written with a capital letter -> k IN h.
    It's by the way ... ;)
  • #8 15785285
    kobietaxxx
    Level 2  
    Posts: 4
    Rate: 30
    Board Language: polish
    zbich70 wrote:
    PS. Watts in kilowatt hours should be written with a capital letter -> kWh.
    It's by the way ...


    I know, I know, carelessness :) Thanks for the help
| New topic
Report a violation of the law

Topic summary

✨ The discussion revolves around understanding how to read kWh values from an Apator meter for different tariffs. The user seeks clarification on which numbers to record from the provided photos of the meter readings. Responses clarify that the relevant codes for energy consumption are 1.8.0 (total energy), 1.8.1 (daytime energy), and 1.8.2 (night and weekend energy). It is confirmed that leading zeros and decimal points do not affect the recorded values, which should be rounded to 755 kWh for 1.8.1 and 1378 kWh for 1.8.2. Additionally, proper notation for kilowatt hours is emphasized.
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT