Panasonic TX-49DX600E vs TX-50DXU701: Comparing Matrix Types, HDMI & USB Ports in 20m2 Room

Please help me choose a model. I wonder if:

Panasonic TX-49DX600E
http://www.displayspecifications.com/en/model/64374c4

Panasonic TX-50DXU701
http://www.displayspecifications.com/en/model/31f18d0

50dxu701 has more hdmi and usb, and MVA matrices. 49DXU600 has an IPS matrix.
The more I read about the differences between the matrix types, the less I know.


1. How big is the room in which the TV is to be located? - 20m2
2. How far are we from the TV screen? - 3m
3. How many people sit in front of the TV? - 2.3 people
4. Are we sitting in front of the screen or also sideways to the screen? - mainly straight ahead, but it can also happen sideways
5. Should the TV stand or should it hang? - to stand
6. How does the sun shine in the room? - windows to the east, the sun is shining in the windows until noon, the tv will stand with a window at the back
7. What kind of TV do you currently have? - 10 years old Samsung LE37M87 FHD
8. What do we want the TV to have? - 4K, USB playback,
9. What signal will be connected to the TV? - DVB-T,
10. What devices? - bluray,
11. How many hours a day should the TV work? 4-5 hours
12. Does it happen that you watch only one program for several hours? - no
13. What kind of programs do you watch the most? - movies, series
14. Are you going to surf the internet? - sometimes
15. Are you going to play games - if so, how many% a day? - no
16. Brand Preference? - Panasonic
17. Size preferences? - 49-50 "
18. What annoys you in TV sets? - muddy, artificial image enhancers
19. Do you watch more in the evenings or during the day? - in the evenings
20. To what maximum amount do you plan to purchase? - 3,000
21. How often do you replace televisions at home? - it will be the first one I buy, so it's hard to answer
22. Do you use internet applications often? - I never had a tv-smart, so I didn't use it

Panasonic TX-50DXU701 is definitely better.
This is generally a good model for mid-range TV viewers - Except that it has a 60Hz matrix and you have to take an allowance for that if you watch a lot of dynamic sports.
The TV will simply show what the camera sees - it will not be able to liquefy this material additionally.

LOCOLOCO wrote:

These are models with a 50 Hz matrix.

Have you been to the cinema lately? Videos on Br are still 23.97 fps.
Any enhancers spoil this 'movie look'. 100Hz pseudo liquidity is a mush for market shopping.

The problem is more complex than what Locoloco writes.

There are actually 3 aspects:

1. Given signal. In fact, movies are still shot at 23.97 fps. It doesn't matter what you watch. Whether 50 or 100 or 200 Hz. The movie will look the same unless you edit it on TV, which brings us to the next point ...

2. TV image processor. Its task is to flow the given signal above the level in which it was recorded. Here, of course, a lamp lights up for cinephiles and picture purists. Each activation of such a function changes what the camera recorded, i.e. cheating starts ... the better the TV does it, the less the theater effect is (fatal, for example, on cheap TV, e.g. TCL)

3. What was 100/120 / 200Hz for? Well, it appeared when 3D came in. Because here the matrix had to give / display 2 separate signals. The minimum without too much image flickering was done by the native 100Hz matrix.

And thus we came to the point why in 2016 and 2017 there was a flood of 60Hz TV - the producers simply killed 3D technologies and hence the 100 Hz matrix was no longer necessary.
They have stated the workhorse sales will now be 4K. So they raised the prices of their models, added nonsense 4K, cut 3D, lowered the matrix heres and ...... started making more money

Ludwik XVI wrote:

they added nonsense 4K, cut 3D, lowered the matrix heres and ...... started making more money

With this nonsense I cannot agree. I have a camera that records in 4K, some say that if you don't see the difference, it's not worth overpaying. But in this case, you can see the difference.
Movies in 4K also have a place to get in, so I completely do not understand your hate.

Back to the topic. This MVA matrix in the 50DXU701 will not haunt me at night?

You can see the differences, but it all depends on the distance. I'm sitting over 3.5m from the 55-inch screen (B6J) and I can't see the difference then ...

And if you will be persecuted, I do not know ... I dream of more pleasant things than TV sets

LOCOLOCO wrote:

There are people who don't make a difference, and maybe you're in this group. It's nothing wrong.

Will you write something in the subject? Which TV will you recommend?