logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Samsung UE49KU6400 vs UE50MU6172: Comparing Matrix, Refresh Rate, Tizen 3.0, and Alternatives

suprajs 10791 17
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 16546575
    suprajs
    Level 13  
    Hello,
    Samsung has prepared for this year model series MU UE50MU6172 (50 "), which is priced in the same range as the previous very good model UE49KU6400.The newer version differs primarily from the predecessor by remote control, voice control (currently only English) and newer system Tizen (3.0). But the most important question for me is the matrix and refreshing or is the new model (one of the cheapest in this series) better or similar to the older one? Are there any significant differences between the two models? There is some alternative in the range of 49- 50 "for those TVs for the price of 3k?

    Thank you for replying,
    greetings
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 16546869
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #3 16564791
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    The KU6400 series is in my opinion better than this year's MU6100.
    49KU6400 was on sVA, in the MU61 series Samsung slowly returns to weaker PLS matrixes. I do not know how it will be in full size, but you have to watch out for the MU61xx series.


    The 2017 series MU64xx also does not look rosy:
    40 inches VA
    49 inches PLS
    55 inches PLS
    65 inches VA
  • #4 16565066
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #5 16565160
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:
    All TCLa modules are on VA matrices with the highest contrast on the market!


    This sentence is not true and introduces misleading readers.
    Native contrast in TCL models (P60 or C70 - available in Poland) is not the highest.

    The TCL P60 has an ANSI 3500: 1 contrast.
    The Samsung KU 6400 has an ANSI 4500: 1 contrast.

    ANSI measurement methodology:
    ANSI Contrast - this is a contrast measured using a chessboard made of 16 white and black rectangles. Field brightness is measured simultaneously, then the average brightness of the white fields is divided by the average brightness of the black boxes.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 16565211
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:


    I do not see the method of measuring the contrast in this "test" - he writes in quotes because the lack of methodology means that it is not a test, but a sensation of use. It's a bit useless.

    Please write what the contrast measurement methodology was.
    I see in the comments that many people ask about it but the author of the "test" does not want to answer - disqualification for me.

    Is this contrast a typical / assorted ANSI measurement?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 16565321
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #9 16565400
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:
    The methodology is the only one designated by the world's only manufacturer of Calman 5 equipment. On this basis all testers in the world are based:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4BC2uaQ-rM
    Undermining this is like undermining the Copernican theory, but what will always be someone who knows better.


    I think we've agreed before that we're serious.
    I am not asking you what equipment was used for measurement, only what test methodology was used.

    So I'll cut it down and ask again:

    Is the native contrast in the 55C70 model measured on the ANSI board?
  • #10 16565404
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #11 16565409
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:
    According to the most important methodology given!


    Give this methodology. The word "most important" does not tell me anything.
    Was this the ANSI board? (I wrote to you above what this methodology looks like)

    I also know different ones, that's why I ask you (did your tester) used / used?
  • #12 16565412
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #14 16565482
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:


    Buddy, this is the instructions for using the device. It can be measured in many ways.

    I will ask you once again: Was the native contrast in the 55C70 model measured on the ANSI board?
  • #15 16565487
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #16 16565517
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    LOCOLOCO wrote:
    It is measured exactly as given by the producer on the film !!!


    The manufacturer does not specify on which board to measure - it's the user's choice of the device.
    Write what you chose - what was your choice? or a standard ANSI board that is used to measure contrast in televisions?

    So the question is again: Was the native contrast in the 55C70 model measured on the ANSI board?
  • #17 16565582
    lycone
    Level 11  
    We will probably not get any answers. In any event, everything will come out in the wash like some reliable portal will do the tests. I am waiting especially for HDTVPolska.
  • #18 16770541
    TVas
    Level 1  
    I am going to buy samsung 49 KU6400, but I heard that you can hit the IPS matrix (PLS) Is that true? How can you check which matrix a given copy has? Can you read which type of sensor was mounted on the TV's rating plate? I would like to add that I do not have the physical ability to watch this TV, and I would like to buy this model in a 49 inch version with a VA matrix (SVA). Please help.

Topic summary

The discussion compares the Samsung UE49KU6400 and UE50MU6172 models, focusing on matrix types, refresh rates, and the Tizen 3.0 operating system. The UE49KU6400 is noted for its superior sVA matrix, while the newer UE50MU6172 is said to utilize a weaker PLS matrix. Users express concerns about the refresh rates, with both models operating at 50 Hz. Alternatives in the 49-50 inch range include TCL and Philips models, which offer better refresh rates (100 Hz) and competitive pricing. The conversation also touches on contrast measurements, with the KU6400 having a higher ANSI contrast ratio compared to some TCL models. Users seek clarity on matrix types and measurement methodologies, indicating a preference for VA matrices for better performance.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT