Best Lens Options for Canon EOS 1300D Under PLN 1300 - Recommendations and Comparisons

Which lens should I buy for the EOS 1300D? I would like to fit up to PLN 1300, which one?

link

link

link

link

link

Buddy, first question: what is it for? You've entered a focal length range of 18-55 mm and 55-250 mm. The first range is practically standard focal length in Cannon lenses sold in "store" sets. The second range is already a tel-lens. As the camera has an APS-C matrix, the focal length will be (i.e. what the matrix sees) 28-88 mm and 88-400 mm, respectively. As for the first range, you can still manage by taking pictures from the so-called "hand". to the second decent tripod. The second thing is what the lens is for. The first provides daily needs in 99%, the second is needed in sporadic cases, unless the colleague's needs are in the reverse order. Personally, I have a Cannon EOS 600D. To him, among others 200 mm fixed lens (i.e. 320 mm for Cannon) used very rarely.

Buddy, you're showing a set of completely different lenses. I have the impression that you want to buy anything. As a beginner photographer, I would advise you to take 30,000 photos with your Canon and then go shopping.
Then you will know yourself what you want, because probably not yet.
I advised you in another thread that you buy some books first, at least one Bryan Peterson, and it will certainly be a great investment in yourself.
You will understand many things that you can't write about in a few words.
You will do as you think, but as you start by reading with the camera in hand you will later thank me, saved money.
As for lenses, it is better to buy less often and better. Try to choose bright and sharp glasses.
Personally, I have more experience in Nikon and I don't know Canon lenses, but the rules are the same.
Take your time shopping, read on some forum. The gunners probably have theirs too.
Don't make mistakes right from the start. A typical error of inexperience is e.g. buying a long zoom.
Much better exposures, though not all, can be done from a wide angle.
I go on vacation, when I visit a lot, I take a lens with focal lengths of 17-55 and that's enough for architecture, landscape and typical memorial photos of family and friends.

If you ask so I will answer. Buy a short 18-55 to start with and learn. Learn a lot, take photos like a colleague above, until you get to what you need. Each of us started and did not know what would be needed until he did it himself. He advised me, e.g. 16-35 f / 2.8 L and this is a good lens but it is not cheap. You don't need grazing to learn.

gabik001 wrote:

If you ask so I will answer. Buy a short 18-55 to start with and learn. Learn a lot, take photos like a colleague above, until you get to what you need. Each of us started and did not know what would be needed until he did it himself. He advised me, e.g. 16-35 f / 2.8 L and this is a good lens but it is not cheap. You don't need grazing to learn.

Do you have any specific model in mind?

cyctrus741 wrote:

gabik001 wrote:

If you ask so I will answer. Buy a short 18-55 to start with and learn. Learn a lot, take photos like a colleague above, until you get to what you need. Each of us started and did not know what would be needed until he did it himself. He advised me, e.g. 16-35 f / 2.8 L and this is a good lens but it is not cheap. You don't need grazing to learn.

Do you have any specific model in mind?

Colleague gabik 001 after all gave you a specific model, just do not be scared, because it costs so much to almost three EOS 1300D.
I have the impression that you do not draw conclusions from the advice given. Taking good photos can not be grasped in a week reading forums and watching videos on the net. You need a bit of self-denial, unless it is only about ill-considered pics of the family, but for this you just need any machine.

I will take photos mainly with my family, landscapes, photos at night. I wish they were good quality pictures. I certainly won't buy a lens for a few thousand.

For photos with family and landscapes "without a drink" is enough with the lens you have. For better quality photos, especially without distortion and sharper images, there will be no better glass. There will be no madness with night equipment with this equipment. To make something sensible at night, you must have a tripod. Note that night images start with an exposure time of 1 second (before dusk) to even 30 seconds.
You can't do anything without a tripod.

What would "exacerbate the situation": I studied photography at Zenith TTL, 122, 12 xp etc. It is known to limit 36 photos. Each frame must be well thought out and well exposed. Now we have digital cameras and an instant photo preview. Once you had to develop a film, make a print, etc. ... Replacing the lens alone was a waste of time. Now the camera does 99% of the work for us. However, the 1% remains, i.e. choosing lighting, focal length, composition of the frame and so on. As I wrote above, I have a Cannon + adapter for lenses with M42 thread. Now I am "sick" of the tripod and it is good to keep the old 1000 mm Mada lens in the USSR. Returning to the topic: I advise a colleague to get to know the camera, that is, to change its settings without error and in the dark. It is a pure technique but without any threads from further adventure. Later, composition of the frame, etc. stuff. This is the beginning. Later career or photos to the "drawer"

Thanks to everyone for help and extensive explanations.