logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

LG 43UH6507 vs LF42652V vs 47LB730V vs 55LB650V vs 55UH6507: Comparing TV Models & Features

c-y-r-u-s 2619 17
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 16447521
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    As in the subject, I am asking for opinions whether the LG LF 42652v is a good TV or better
    LG 43UH6507 I can still buy it, but there is no 3D and I do not know what the matrix is or good, I mean the 43-inch version

    I am also interested in:
    -LG 47LB730V
    -LG 55LB650V
    -LG 55UH6507 vs LG 43UH6507

    Which will be the best
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 16447546
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    I seriously wonder about this -LG 47LB730V is it better than LF652v?

    Added after 1 [minutes]:

    4K I have no pressure, I just need a good FULLHD min 100Hz
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 16447553
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #5 16447558
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    I do not buy used, it is about lb652v anyway ?? only for comparison. I mean the LG 47LB730V
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 16447563
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #7 16447567
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    The LF652 was once quite a good FHD TV with IPS and 120Hz matrix.
    It had a very good price and was often sold as LG's top model in supermarkets like Auchan and Carrefour.

    LB650V is also IPS and 120Hz but I do not know this model. I think a model from 3 or 4 years ago ...
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 16447574
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    So lg 42lf652v and 47lb730v are the same ??

    I am also interested in:
    -LG 47LB730V
    -LG 55LB650V
    -LG 49UF850V
    -LG 50LB670V

    In summary, which will be ok
  • #9 16447588
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #10 16447624
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    So, gentlemen, specialists who
    -LG 47LB730V
    -LG 55LB650V
    -LG 49UF850V
    -LG 50LB670V
  • #11 16447753
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    My voice on 55LB650V, because it is the largest and quite ok on paper for IPS.
    The disadvantage is probably only the first version of the webos. You would have to check it out.
  • #12 16448129
    dodger156
    Level 5  
    I also recommend the 55LB650V. A friend uses it and is very happy with it.
  • #13 16448341
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    Other models
    -LG 47LB730V
    -LG 49UF850V
    -LG 50LB670V

    What matrices do they have? 55 inches is probably too much for a fullHD, what do you think?

    Added after 1 [minutes]:

    Model -LG 49UF850V is it full 4K?

    Added after 30 [minutes]:

    What matrix does this LG 47LB730V model have, I will probably take it
  • #14 16448493
    Ludwik XVI
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    c-y-r-u-s wrote:
    55 inches is probably too much for a fullHD, what do you think?


    Perfect size for 2.5-3m distance
  • #15 16448598
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    What matrix does this LG 47LB730V model have and where can I buy it? Or the rest?
  • #16 16448767
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #17 16450752
    c-y-r-u-s
    Level 16  
    Someone just cleaned it up for me LG 47LB730V.
    I take -LG 47LB670V if it's a good choice for matrix 120Hz 2.1 sound
  • #18 16450915
    Anonymous
    Level 1  

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around comparing various LG TV models, specifically the LG LF42652V, LG 43UH6507, LG 47LB730V, LG 55LB650V, and LG 55UH6507. Users express concerns about the matrix specifications and refresh rates, noting that the LF652V features a 100Hz matrix while the UH6507 has a 50Hz refresh rate but supports 4K resolution. The LG 55LB650V is recommended for its size and IPS panel, although it has an older version of webOS. The LG 47LB730V is also discussed, with users inquiring about its matrix type and availability, confirming it has an IPS matrix and is difficult to find as it has not been produced for several years. Overall, the consensus leans towards the LG 55LB650V and LG 47LB730V as solid choices for Full HD viewing.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT