logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 vs Huawei P9 Lite: Specs, Reviews, User Experiences Compared

19siwy20 6579 11
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 16630854
    19siwy20
    Level 9  
    Hello, I have a small request for a short but concrete comparison of these phones. Of course, I watched their specifications, movies, but I can not decide, and the evaluation of these phones is different on different pages. Maybe someone has used a longer time and can share an opinion.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 16630859
    tino2003
    Admin of GSM Group
    Write what you expect from the phone and then you can suggest something.
  • #3 16630862
    19siwy20
    Level 9  
    First of all, reliability and speed of operation when installing a larger number of applications. The apparatus, for example, is a secondary matter.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 16630881
    tino2003
    Admin of GSM Group
    So definitely J5 2017 because huawei are good only in dry data and when they are running they are far behind.
    I used J5 2016 for some time and I did not have any objections to it and here in J5 2017 the parameters are even better.
  • #5 16630897
    19siwy20
    Level 9  
    Well, watching the review surprised me that Huawei has a better result in antutu than J5.
  • #6 16860524
    myszka2508
    Level 2  
    Well, somehow I'm not convinced Samsung. If S is cool, then J seems to me plastic and delicate.
  • #7 16939769
    fallenang
    Level 9  
    And I've heard that they are trimmed versions and they break down quickly. You can always compare in comparisons and see how they differ mainly.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 16940168
    shewaited8
    Level 8  
    In Samsung AMOLEDs do the job but expensive in the event of an exchange. Personally, however, J5 ;)
    and by the way ... such a Samsung Galaxy J5 and its other names J510F and J510FN used alternately at display sellers. Assuming buying a display described as J510F and mounting to J510FN, will I encounter startup or operation problems? Does it matter?
  • #9 16944998
    fallenang
    Level 9  
    Amoled is a higher ride at all. It has always been known that the replacement of the display is a big cost and sometimes it was not worth it. But a good display is one thing, but the memory and the camera are also important. And here comparing the specifications in comparison engines can be helpful.
  • #10 16952544
    windowisall
    Level 8  
    Definitely j5. It is true that the performance should theoretically lie on the huawei side, but the phone itself sharply cools down in the long run. As for Samsung - a metal housing, a great screen are the main advantages, I would personally include multimedia as well, the quality of sound on the headphones is quite good. On the loudspeaker - let's face it, it's a low-budget model, there's nothing to say about it. What p9 lite model do you speak about? 2016 or 2017?
    In conclusion - from these two models I would take ... motorola moto g5s, but that's because a clean android is a good android (at least for me) :D
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #11 16952753
    shewaited8
    Level 8  
    J5 Mr. Buddy does not have a metal case ?
  • #12 16954259
    windowisall
    Level 8  
    And he has :D from the "2017" version, all J series models have a metal casing.

Topic summary

The discussion compares the Samsung Galaxy J5 2017 and Huawei P9 Lite, focusing on user experiences and specifications. Users express a preference for the J5 2017 due to its reliability, speed, and build quality, despite acknowledging that the P9 Lite may have better benchmark scores in Antutu. Concerns about the Huawei's performance under load and its perceived fragility compared to the J5 are noted. The J5 2017 is praised for its AMOLED display and overall multimedia performance, while the P9 Lite's performance is questioned, particularly regarding long-term usage. The conversation also touches on the importance of build materials, with the J5 2017 featuring a metal casing, which is seen as a positive aspect.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT