Elektroda.com
Elektroda.com
X

6203A - Integrated circuit identification - SOT89 housing

Jackziom 12534 7
This content has been translated flag-pl » flag-en View the original version here.
  • #1
    Jackziom
    Level 23  
    Hello!

    I would like to know what the integrated circuit is. Unfortunately, I can't take photos at the moment but it seems to be in the housing SOT-89 (or twin). It works in an LED lamp with a PIR sensor. Personally, I suspect that this is a voltage regulator and a "driver" of LEDs.

    Below I put a preview drawing of the system (I also drew the manufacturer's logo, but I don't remember what the manufacturer is):

    6203A - Integrated circuit identification - SOT89 housing

    I would be very grateful for any suggestions and help. Regards.
  • #3
    Anonymous
    Level 1  
  • #5
    maksmyk
    Level 2  
    The full designation of this voltage regulator is ME6203A, and the company that produces this series is MICRONE.
  • #6
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    maksmyk wrote:
    The full designation of this voltage regulator is ME6203A, and the company that produces this series is MICRONE.

    The archaeologist appeared with his first post 9 years after registration.
  • #7
    maksmyk
    Level 2  
    Letter A = no '' CE '', i.e. no certificate for the European Union. In addition, there are digits in the second row, which probably specify the voltage and current values, but it is difficult to decipher by illustrative list of the manufacturer. The voltage spread is considerable, but all models have low current efficiency.

    Moderated By Marek_Skalski:

    I invite my colleague to other topics, such current ones. ;)

  • #8
    DiZMar
    Level 43  
    maksmyk wrote:
    Letter A = no '' CE '', i.e. no certificate for the European Union. In addition, there are digits in the second row, which probably specify the voltage and current values, but it is difficult to decipher by illustrative list of the manufacturer. The voltage spread is considerable, but all models have low current efficiency.

    Note that the problem is 3.5 years old. Probably out of date for a long time and you are presenting your analysis here.