logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

High Ping in Evening Games: Radio Internet, Antenna & Solutions for Peak Hour Latency Issues

capitank96 8625 13
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 16812578
    capitank96
    Level 2  
    Good evening, I am writing with a problem that I have been struggling with for about a month, namely high ping in games, but only in the evening. In the morning or late in the evening (around 23-24) ping is low, it does not cause any problems (jumping or maintaining high ping as it is in the evening). I called the network operator (radio internet) with this problem, the service provider checked the range and announced that it was at the level of 100%, also damage to the antenna can be ruled out. I tried to connect the Internet directly to the computer via cable and router, but it does not change anything. Can you suggest a solution?
    High Ping in Evening Games: Radio Internet, Antenna & Solutions for Peak Hour Latency Issues High Ping in Evening Games: Radio Internet, Antenna & Solutions for Peak Hour Latency Issues High Ping in Evening Games: Radio Internet, Antenna & Solutions for Peak Hour Latency Issues
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 16812603
    seb235
    Level 28  
    If the ping is high only in the evening hours, which I understand in peak hours, it probably does not make the connection / equipment on the side of your ISP. Unfortunately, wireless links have it that they quickly clog up and ping starts to grow. There is probably only one solution to this problem - changing your ISP to the one that provides a copper or fiber optic service in your location. Unfortunately, the radio Internet for games is average.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 16814423
    KOCUREK1970
    Network and Internet specialist
    capitank96 wrote:
    Can you suggest a solution?

    1 Play online in non-evening hours.
    2 Force the current operator to increase the overhead (bandwidth) on his network.
    3 Change supplier.
    There is no other way to do it.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 16826301
    waluszek
    Level 19  
    Quote:
    The thing about wireless links is that they quickly clog up and ping starts to grow


    This is not entirely the case, it all depends on the operator and the infrastructure. If the operator has a base to which 30 clients will connect, and this base is powered by a poor-quality radio, or poorly tuned, or worse, it is a 3 or 5 jump on the skeleton, the bridge does not work and the pings jump. Rarely, the operator decides to use decent shipments to remote bases.

    It all depends on the provider and the willingness to provide a good quality service.

    Copper cable or optical fiber is still not a panacea for all ills. It should be remembered that between the ISP and the game server there is often a whole number of internet sites :) and intermediate networks, and no one can guarantee the condition of the network further downstream.

    I wonder what everyone insisted on complaining about this unfortunate radio, I currently have over 200 clients on the radio and a lot of players, especially "CS" and no one complains about high pings or poor quality internet, I think I managed to cure radiophobia with them . :)
  • #5 16827294
    crashbit
    Level 15  
    waluszek wrote:
    It all depends on the provider and the willingness to provide a good quality service.

    Well, that's the problem. There are two radio suppliers in my area. One of them (the bigger one I once bought internet). As it turned out, during peak hours it was not possible to load pictures on websites (max 24Mbps connection). As I went with the complaints it is standard text. "Everything is fine with us." "probably the processor is not working for you, or the disk just read a lot", "possibly the switch loses packets". The Komp was connected directly to their mikrotika with a 6th category cable with i7 3gen and ssd samsung pro 840. But the hour of war with the owner only led to the fact that the gentlemen took off what they had put on with a huge grace and a waste of money for the assembly service.
    So, in my opinion, my colleagues are right, the option to change ISP is probably the only one. I doubt there would be any chances of persuading the operator to change the equipment :)
  • #6 16829530
    seb235
    Level 28  
    You know because in general the problem is mostly with small suppliers, regardless of the technology they provide the service. Because on the one hand you save money and on the other hand you want to earn money quickly and the effect is always the same.
  • #7 16830358
    crashbit
    Level 15  
    But technology simply cannot cope with a large number of customers in a small area. And it will not. Unfortunately, sharing the transmission medium does the job completely. The small number of separated channels and other aspects are just a bottleneck.
    The same story applies to all LTE technologies. It works fine as long as there are not too many takers.
    I absolutely do not believe that you can create a good, fast wifi network in a small area with lots of people. There would have to be transmitters every bit and very short ranges. Even if someone would come close to solving such problems, at what cost.
    And let's not be charmed. What can you give to link to your users to make it good. We have a housing estate in the city (tight buildings) and we want 50 users there, and each of them wants to have, for example, 30Mbps. Even assuming a simultaneousness of 50%, the transmitter would have to squeeze out of itself 750Mbps. So let's count what costs.

    Moderated By jimasek:

    I deleted an excerpt from your post regarding deleted posts from a topic.

  • #8 16831604
    waluszek
    Level 19  
    Quote:
    What can you give to link to your users to make it good. We have a housing estate in the city (tight buildings) and we want 50 users there, and each of them wants to have, for example, 30Mbps. Even assuming a simultaneousness of 50%, the transmitter would have to squeeze out of itself 750Mbps. So let's count what costs.


    Apparently, my friend knows the theories of building a radio network and has never done one himself.

    I have an example from my network, the network has been working since May, I have about 200 clients, a lot of CS players, I sell packages up to 80 mega (YES Radio)
    And I haven't had a single complaint yet that the ping is high, the net is bad or something like that.
    Yes, there are complaints that something does not work, but it is only electronics, sometimes the client's router freezes, sometimes the antenna.

    This is verified by the fact that people are giving up neostrada for my network.

    If you are setting up a network with a get-rich-quick scheme in mind, I have to recover from the mistake, it is impossible in the long run. Because customers will verify it very quickly and let it go with the bags.

    The golden rule I follow is selling the Internet only from the base connected to the optical fiber, or a good radio link and not making radio chicks, unless the client is aware of it and cares about the connection, I will explain to him beforehand how it works and what the risks are. But fortunately I don't have many of them.

    It all depends on whether you do what you like and earn money by the way, or do what you have to and try to earn as much as possible before (the loser) realizes that he is pounded in the horns.
  • #9 16832620
    crashbit
    Level 15  
    waluszek wrote:
    I have about 200 clients, a lot of CS players, I sell packages up to 80 mega

    Tell me, buddy, how many antennas do you have on the stations and what type?
  • #10 16839495
    waluszek
    Level 19  
    I have 4 bases in total, 3 Rocket AC lite sets + AM-5G16-120 antenna on each. 3 bases connected with optical fiber and one with AC PtP rockets.
    There are approximately 3-4 clients out of 80 for each database.
    The most customers are with 10 and 20 mega packages, there are also many with 40 mega packages. I have over a dozen 80 mega packages.

    Only the specificity is a bit strange for me, because I have a lot of multi-family buildings, connected in such a way that there is one AC antenna on the roof and customers are connected to it in a collective form. as a rule, 4-6 to one antenna.
  • #11 16839662
    crashbit
    Level 15  
    waluszek wrote:
    connected in collective form. as a rule, 4-6 to one antenna

    Well, it certainly makes your task much easier. Maybe you're right, maybe not. My experiences are bad. Maybe the terrain is bad. Maybe people do not calculate because ISP prefers to invest in blocks of flats. I have no idea.
    Out of curiosity, I can ask what uplink do you have? What's in your core?
  • #12 16839733
    waluszek
    Level 19  
    Currently, I have 0.5 Gbps netia, link saturation at 40% with about 200 clients. + 200 mega Vlan under IPTV. Celeron + debian based router and mikrotik CCR1009 as PPPoE concentrator
    In general, equipment with a large reserve of power for further development. At a later stage, he plans to switch to optics.

    The assumption was that I did not want to duplicate the mistakes of other operators, with whom I also encountered some time, I assumed a longer payback period, but I could use better equipment and balance it more, unfortunately there are still many ISPs who approach the topic negligently. especially when they have a monopoly in the area.
  • #13 16840059
    crashbit
    Level 15  
    waluszek wrote:
    Currently, I have 0.5 Gbps netia, link saturation at 40% with about 200 clients. + 200 mega Vlan under IPTV. Celeron + debian based router and mikrotik CCR1009 as PPPoE concentrator
    In general, equipment with a large reserve of power for further development. At a later stage, he plans to switch to optics.

    The assumption was that I did not want to duplicate the mistakes of other operators, with whom I also encountered some time, I assumed a longer payback period, but I could use better equipment and balance it more, unfortunately there are still many ISPs who approach the topic negligently. especially when they have a monopoly in the area.


    Well, the operator I was talking about has 3 10Gbps links. For the sake of the image, I will say that I can sell optical fibers in packages of up to 500 / 50Mbps and the subscription fee in this offer is PLN 59 per month, of course gross. Additionally, there are higher forks at night and you can have twice as much. It is logical that there is no need to buy good equipment for users.
    I live in the above-mentioned housing estate and as the ONLY I have vdsl with orange which pulls 80Mbps because I fought for a week on the hotline that the wardrobe with light has been in the estate for 2 years and NO ONE has been connected to it. It's probably for the sake of peace they gave it. The rest can choose from ADSL max 3Mbps with a link to the exchange 3 kilometers from the house (despite the cabinet on the premises) or the above-mentioned ISP that has them in ........
    The big question is why celeron with debian is routing you and not MT? I put the above-mentioned mt a few times as a tip in demanding places and with a few dozen rules on FireWall plus extensive queuing, he did not tire much with two 500 lines. Any additional reason why it is on the Intel?
    Moderated By jimasek:

    Profanity
    3.1.13. Take care of linguistic correctness and follow the rules of netiquette. Do not post messages that make it difficult to deduce what their author wanted to convey.

  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #14 16840648
    waluszek
    Level 19  
    Celeron with Debian for a simple reason, there is also a whole network management system "LMS" Statistics, and a whole lot of other services. Debian gives the freedom to compile what is needed, and you don't have to stick to the software manufacturer's framework. After that, the other way around. "LMS" He couldn't manage the network, and so he is connected by a radius, and does what it should, ie PPPoE firewall sessions for clients and so on.

    And it is on the Intel because when I started building it, I had such equipment at hand, in the sense of the board has an integrated processor and is in the picoITX format, it consumes only 25 W of electricity. It just happened somehow :)

    As for your ISP with optical fiber, it apparently does not fully cover your backyard if such a network does not work for him, or it collapses and assumes that it will be somehow. and counts on low prices and economies of scale.

Topic summary

High ping issues during evening gaming sessions are attributed to peak hour congestion in radio internet connections. Users report that while their connection is stable during off-peak hours, latency spikes occur in the evening, suggesting that the problem lies with the ISP's infrastructure rather than the user's equipment. Recommendations include switching to a different ISP that offers copper or fiber optic services, as radio internet is often inadequate for gaming. Some users emphasize the importance of quality infrastructure and equipment, noting that many small ISPs struggle to provide reliable service due to high client loads and poor network management. Suggestions for improvement include increasing bandwidth, playing during non-peak hours, or changing providers altogether.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT