logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

[Solved] Free alternative to Microsoft Windows server 2012 - active directory

terry1996 7254 9
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17053146
    terry1996
    Level 18  
    Hello, I am looking for a free alternative to MW server 2012 with the acive drirectory function to manage users, I cut costs at the client and it would be nice to propose something sensible, probably a neutral platform, probably Linux, but I will listen to all the suggestions.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 17053277
    JacekCz
    Level 42  
    The most I would expect from (note, Linux orthodox shouting) Redhat / Fedora / Centos. It seems that in these distributions, directory services are not a "sheepskin flower" from five enthusiasts, but something constantly controlled, sold on the market, etc. ... How do you have a small budget, maybe a commercial RH? Evaluation license for free for developers.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/389_Directory_Server
    and other -> LDAP, Directory services
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LDAP_software
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 17053343
    terry1996
    Level 18  
    I'm looking for something free for callcenter, so it's not devopsi
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 17054498
    terry1996
    Level 18  
    It must be a domain, and according to the samba manager, it has been implemented for several weeks - a server + 60 hosts
  • #6 17055017
    rafish
    Level 13  
    in samba you can start a domain, here you have another guide http://slow7.pl/linux/item/74-active-directory-w-wydaniu-linux
    there is probably no other free alternative to Windows Server ...
    by the way - to work in the domain you need windows at least professional version on client stations, I write about it because it happens that companies have computers with homes and those in the domain do not work, sometimes obvious things are overlooked ;)
  • #7 17055771
    terry1996
    Level 18  
    Current computers work under windows server 2012, so I assume they have PRO, but the license ends in 180 days and we are looking for an alternative :D
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 17055801
    rafish
    Level 13  
    I understand, the 180-day version, well, if it works now, it's rather good with clients, while for a free domain controller it's probably just a samba on a penguin, debian or fedora depending on your preferences, try to run a virtualbox, launch virtual debian and two client windows you should calmly pull some uncompromising comp, and you will have some view of the matter, I have not heard of anything else that could replace the server version of windows
  • #9 17055938
    JacekCz
    Level 42  
    In a formal matter; The Active Directory SAMA service has substitutes, it is ONLY a directory service. One or the other specific service (let's give it an email server authentication) can also be used. Login of windows clients obviously depends on the Pro version.
    Given the times they are, generally the inclusion of everything in the firmware, the pressure on file servers etc. is less. A lot depends on how sensible the central business system is (if it is - or just crazy copying of office documents)

    The fullness of local and network services, network folders presented in AD and I don't know what else (i.e. a conglomerate of AD-oriented services) is difficult / impossible to replace.
  • #10 17128591
    terry1996
    Level 18  
    We stayed at the windows server, it turned out cheaper than migrating even to free soft - a lot of time for it to take

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around finding a free alternative to Microsoft Windows Server 2012 that includes Active Directory functionality for user management. Participants suggest various Linux distributions, particularly Red Hat, Fedora, and CentOS, as viable options. They highlight Samba as a key tool for implementing Active Directory-like services on Linux, with Debian being recommended for its cost-free nature. Users are cautioned that Windows client machines must be at least the Professional version to work within a domain. Despite exploring alternatives, one participant ultimately concludes that staying with Windows Server is more cost-effective than migrating to free software due to the time investment required for such a transition.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT