[Solved] GoodRam 240GB CL100 vs 256GB CX400 SSD: Which is better for C++, Java, SQL & Virtual Machines?

Hello!
As I am already annoyed by the 120GB SSD drive for the system - I decided to buy an inexpensive drive with a capacity of> 240GB on which I will put the system and the current 120GB will serve as a storage for frequently used files.

The choice fell on the following two drives, i.e. the native GoodRam.
You can choose from the older 240GB CL100 (TLC memory) or the newer CX400 (256GB capacity, 3D TLC memory).

Unfortunately, the only comparison I found comes from pclab, where the first time in the tests, and the second time.

The price is basically the same so it doesn't matter which one is cheaper.

The computer is mainly used for programming in C ++, Java and playing with SQL. Occasionally, you also need to run a virtual machine (read: working with files with a size of 20-40GB.)

Thanks for the answers.

Hello.
Of the cheap drives, it is worth considering the more proven Crucial BX500 models. The cost is similar to that of GoodRAM, and the disks selected by my colleague are not the most interesting.

dt1 wrote:

Hello.
Of the cheap drives, it is worth considering the more proven Crucial BX500 models. The cost is similar to that of GoodRAM, and the disks selected by my colleague are not the most interesting.

Welcome! I have to buy glasses because I got so fixated on these GoodFrames that I didn't even notice the existence of anything other than the MX500, haha.

Disk (BX500) purchased. I close the topic.
Thanks for the help.

Now it's time to check why during the first formatting the temperature suddenly (

HDTune is a terrible diagnostic program, and it screams sometimes where there is no reason. I wouldn't care much about the indications of this program.

BX500 was purchased. The drive functions normally, although due to the plastic housing it reaches higher temperatures (5-10 degrees) than the older GoodRam during normal operation.