How to Increase IR Sensor Range to 5cm and Reduce Ambient Light Noise with Op-Amp Filters

57 11

#1 21658956 13 May 2011 09:56

Vinit Apte Vinit Apte

Anonymous

Post #1
21658956 13 May 2011 09:56

Hi, I am using IR sensors(transmitter and receiver pair) to detect an object.The object to be detected is a plain white colored. Basically I am having two problems with using my module viz 1) The range of IR sensors is very small about 2cm only(I want to increase it to at least 5cm). 2)The output of the receiver is noisy and affected a lot by ambient light. I am running the transmitter on 4Khz clock and 5V and the output of receiver is 0-2.1V in the range 0-2cm(I want to make this 5cm). I am using a high pass filter of 50Hz to reduce the effect of ambient light. Can anyone please suggest me on how to increase the range and reduce the noise. Please let me know if some other filters using opamp can be more effective in reducing the noise. Thanks
ADVERTISEMENT
#2 21658957 13 May 2011 10:19

Olin Lathrop Olin Lathrop

Anonymous

Post #2
21658957 13 May 2011 10:19

I take it that this is a reflection detection sensor, not a beam interrupt sensor?

If you are chopping the transmitter at 4KHz, then why filter the receiver only at 50Hz? The amount of reflection of the transmitted beam is indicated by the peak to peak level of the 4KHz received signal.

In this case, you not only know the frequency but the phase of the transmitted signal. That should allow you to do a synchronous detector, which will be more effective (tighter band) than a simple passive low pass filter.

In fact there is nothing magic about 4KHz. Putting both the transmitting and detecting algorithms in the same micro should greatly help eliminate external noise. The micro would turn on the transmitter, wait a few microcseconds for the receiver to stabalize, take a reading, turn off the transmitter, wait, etc. It would subtract the off reading from the on reading, then low pass that result a bit.

You should also be able to extend range with the right optics. If the transmitter sends out a narrow beam and the receiver looks only along the same narrow beam, then more of what the receiver sees will be a function of the transmitted beam, which increases signal to noise ratio.
#3 21658958 13 May 2011 10:29

Vinit Apte Vinit Apte

Anonymous

Post #3
21658958 13 May 2011 10:29

Thanks for your reply.
Just let me know if the technique for noise reduction is correctly interpreted by me
1) Turn the transmitter via micro.
2) Give a delay a some usec and then read the output of the reciver i.e receiver reading should be taken after some time after the transmitter transmits. This should reduce the noise right!
#4 21658959 13 May 2011 10:43

Olin Lathrop Olin Lathrop

Anonymous

Post #4
21658959 13 May 2011 10:43

That's half of it. The other half is to do the same thing but turn the transmitter off. The signal you are looking for is the difference between the on and off readings. I would also low pass filter this difference. In other words, take multiple differences into account when deciding what the signal level is.

The theory is that the ambient noise is low frequency and not synchronous to your turning the transmitter on and off. For any short interval, you assume the ambient light level is constant, so the difference between what you measure with the transmitter on and off represents the the transmitter's light seen by the receiver.

Another way to look at this is that the off reading is the ambient light level and the on reading the ambient plus reflected light level. You only care about the reflected light level, which is what you get by subtracting the two.
ADVERTISEMENT
#5 21658960 13 May 2011 10:47

Vinit Apte Vinit Apte

Anonymous

Post #5
21658960 13 May 2011 10:47

Thanks, got it now what are you saying
ADVERTISEMENT
#6 21658961 14 May 2011 10:27

Todd Hayden Todd Hayden

Anonymous

Post #6
21658961 14 May 2011 10:27

is there physical room to mechanically 'filter' the sensor? a tube extending from the sensor to reduce ambient light?
#7 21658962 14 May 2011 10:36

Vinit Apte Vinit Apte

Anonymous

Post #7
21658962 14 May 2011 10:36

Yes I have just wrapped the sensor on sides with a black rubber.
#8 21658963 27 May 2011 11:01

Anirudh Easwar Anirudh Easwar

Anonymous

Post #8
21658963 27 May 2011 11:01

Extremely happy the Micromouse 'bug' is still alive in you!! Good luck and call me if you need any help
#9 21658964 27 Jul 2011 17:41

Duane Gibbs Duane Gibbs

Anonymous

Post #9
21658964 27 Jul 2011 17:41

You should also use an InfraRed filter over your IR sensor to block ambient visible light that can cause DC shifts. If you increase your transmitter frequency you can add a bandpass filter centered at that frequency with smaller components and this will filter out unwanted signals. Stay away from 40KHz to 100KHz range as this is where many IR remotes operate that could interfere with your readings. And be aware that your target color in visible light is not what your receiver sees in IR light. For instance, some blacks may be bright some whites may be dark in IR. The color and material of your target will affect your effective range unless it is controlled or you take other measures to remove this difference.
ADVERTISEMENT
#10 21658965 27 Jul 2011 17:53

Olin Lathrop Olin Lathrop

Anonymous

Post #10
21658965 27 Jul 2011 17:53

Yes, there can be quite a difference between reflectance or transmission in visible versus IR.

I found out the hard way once that the common black electrical tape is rather transmissive in IR. Even three layers of it in a IR photo interrupter slot didn't trip the interrupter, even though that blocked all but a tiny fraction of visible light.
#11 21658966 27 Jul 2011 21:46

Cody Miller Cody Miller

Anonymous

Post #11
21658966 27 Jul 2011 21:46

That is surprising. I would have thought electrical tape would have blocked IR. I remember being surprised when I first learned that glass blocks IR.
#12 21658967 29 Jul 2011 13:49

Khaba Bulu Khaba Bulu

Anonymous

Post #12
21658967 29 Jul 2011 13:49

If you are not too rigid about using IR sensors, you might want to try Ultrasonic detection, the range is longer than its IR counter parts and it is less interference prone than them, it uses the howlround or feedback effect experienced between mic and speakers. But in this case your speaker is an ultrasonic emitter and your mic an ultrasonic receiver.
Create an account, log in here. You will receive points by participating in discussions.
Join this discussion.

Install Elektroda application

Didn't find an answer? Ask Artificial Intelligence

*I agree to send the question to OpenAI, Anthropic PBC, Perplexity AI, Inc., Kagi Inc., Google LLC - owners of language models in order to prepare the best response. The companies may monitor and log information entered into the form.

*I agree to publicly display my question and answer. The question and answer will be publicly available to everyone. The process may take a few minutes. Upon completion, you will be redirected to the page with the answer.

Wait...(2min)

Topic summary

The discussion addresses increasing the detection range of an IR sensor pair from approximately 2cm to 5cm and reducing ambient light noise affecting the receiver output. The sensor operates with a 4kHz modulated IR transmitter at 5V, and the receiver output ranges from 0 to 2.1V within 0-2cm. A 50Hz high-pass filter is currently used to mitigate ambient light interference, but this is insufficient. It is recommended to implement synchronous detection by modulating the transmitter at 4kHz and sampling the receiver output both when the transmitter is on and off, then subtracting the off reading (ambient light) from the on reading (ambient plus reflected IR). This differential measurement, followed by low-pass filtering, effectively reduces noise and isolates the reflected IR signal. Mechanical methods such as using a black rubber wrap or an IR optical filter over the sensor can further reduce ambient visible light interference. Increasing the modulation frequency and applying a bandpass filter centered at that frequency can improve noise rejection, but frequencies between 40kHz and 100kHz should be avoided due to common IR remote interference. The reflectance characteristics of the target in IR differ from visible light, affecting detection range. Alternative sensing methods like ultrasonic detection are suggested for longer range and reduced interference. Additionally, optical design improvements (e.g., lenses or tubes) can enhance range by focusing or limiting the sensor's field of view.
Summary generated by the language model.

How to Increase IR Sensor Range to 5cm and Reduce Ambient Light Noise with Op-Amp Filters

Didn't find an answer? Ask Artificial Intelligence

Topic summary