logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Remote control of heating in a 160m2 house - Fibaro or Danfoss Link?

blur 8316 27
Best answers

How can I remotely control the temperature in individual rooms of a 160 m² house over the internet, preferably with a central system and without having to rebuild all the piping?

If you cannot rebuild the heating into manifolds, the practical route is to control the radiators with electrically driven valves or Z-Wave heads, then add a controller for internet access [#12417955][#12416081] However, several replies warn that motorized electronic heads can be noisy at night and battery-powered Z-Wave heads are inconvenient to maintain, so a wired solution is preferable where possible [#12415824][#12415942] If you can redesign the system around manifolds, the more robust solution is manifolds with actuators and flow meters, controlled from room thermostats; DEVIreg 550 / the DEVI system was suggested as an advanced option [#12415824] For a cheaper internet-controlled setup, one reply suggested OpenRemote with an Aeotec Z-Wave USB stick, or dedicated controllers such as Sterbox, i-SAB, or LanKontroller [#12416081][#12417955] The thread also suggests starting with a single-room Z-Wave test before committing to the whole house [#12428870]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 12400350
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    Welcome,

    i am in the process of renovating a bunk house of about 160m2, as we live in it I am doing one room at a time and changing the CO installation in each room. I am installing an eco-pea boiler next year. I'm fitting new panel radiators with thermostatic heads in the rooms. Sometimes in winter we want to get away from the house for a few days and there is a problem. I would like to have remote (internet) control of the temperatures in each room, for example I go skiing, I lower the temperature in the house to 15 degrees, the boiler burns less and for a longer time is enough, and a few hours before I return to raise the temperature to 22 degrees but not necessarily in all rooms. I am considering Fibaro + LIVING CONNECT Z-WAVE thermostatic head and Danfoss Link with their cheaper heads. I can also pull the wires.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 12400970
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    Maybe check out this esterownik.co.uk . I don't know if it is possible to control zones, but they specialise in remote management of eco-pea picks. Perhaps zone control can be done independently in such an installation.... but this would have to be checked.
  • #3 12401816
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    I already have a cooker with this controller and this is not an option.
  • #4 12412519
    Adarkar
    Level 15  
    Posts: 209
    Help: 12
    Rate: 16
    You need to start from the beginning, i.e. create user specifications.
    That is, what you want to control and how you want to control it, whether local, group or central. Whether replacing the heating involves replacing the whole heating system or just new radiators plus controls and a boiler room.

    For my part, I advise against electronic thermostatic heads with a motor driven by an electric motor.
  • #5 12415650
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    Adarkar: as I wrote, every year 1-2 rooms will be renovated + the whole boiler room will be new, the control is to be both local and central, justify why you advise against electronic heads? Which ones have you had contact with? Or generally all of them suck, please justify.
  • #6 12415824
    Adarkar
    Level 15  
    Posts: 209
    Help: 12
    Rate: 16
    So the pipes in the walls are also new and you can do everything on manifolds?
    If so, buy manifolds with motors and flow meters and control via a motor in the boiler room with a controller in the room. Have a look at DEVIreg 550 and the DEVI system. Quite expensive, but very advanced.

    As for the motorised heads, they just make a lot of noise at night. I've been playing around with a Honeywell RH-20 and the motor buzzes during closing opening, which is audible in the quiet of the night.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 12415942
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    I don't know if these actuators make any noise, but the batarian way of powering the Z-wave heads is not very ergonomic in the long run either. If it wasn't to be an overhaul then ok, you can get away with it, but to fund yourself like this every season, and maybe more often, with a battery change. I don't think that's quite the point. Adarkar's direction seems right.
  • #8 12416081
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    As far as the costs are concerned, you can probably use rechargeable batteries or plug in the power supply, Adarkar: so you only tested these ?, I think I will buy 2 Dunfos Living Connect Z-Wave heads for a test, I was thinking about Fibaro but the price is a bit frightening, so I looked into the subject and I found something like this http://www.openremote.org/display/HOME/OpenRemote so we put a block with this software to this http://aeotec.com/z-wave-usb-stick and we have Fibaro ? admittedly not in Polish and probably not that extensive but the software is open, there is also an application for Android which is all I care about
    theoretically I can start with something like Fibaro for 500PLN and not 3k

    Added after 3 [hours] 11 [minutes]:

    Adarkar wrote:
    So pipes in the walls also new and you can do everything on manifolds?
    If so, buy manifolds with actuators and flow meters and control via the actuator in the boiler room with the controller in the room. Have a look at DEVIreg 550 and the DEVI system. Quite expensive, but very advanced.

    As for the motorised heads, they just make a lot of noise at night. I've been playing with a Honeywell RH-20 and during the closing opening process the motor hums, which can be heard in the still of the night.


    sory but I don't see any way of hooking this DEVI up to the net or am I looking at it wrong ?, generally now it's all audible in the radiators, pump, feeder, I'll see how I can hear the Danfos Living Connect. As far as the installation is concerned such a valve island is out, too many of these pipes I would have to pull, this would be ok with the underfloor.
  • #9 12417353
    Adarkar
    Level 15  
    Posts: 209
    Help: 12
    Rate: 16
    Good luck and let us know when you have realised.
  • #10 12417391
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    How would one put it delicately.... and not to come off as warped. Go to the fibaro forum and google the forum and put in the search term - heating, faucets, danfoss and have a read. Unless you've already done that and it doesn't deter you. In your system, the problem is that actually hardware-wise the easiest way to implement this is by radio on thermostatic heads.... and in such a solution Z-wave is actually the exception among system solutions.
  • #11 12417540
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    I can implement this by wire, but I still don't see an alternative to either valves or LAN control
  • #12 12417669
    W0jtek92
    Level 39  
    Posts: 3852
    Help: 469
    Rate: 1253
    Hi. Is the control of the "zones" to be planned? e.g. you go for 5 days and on the 4th day out you raise the temperature or is it spontaneous i.e. you go for 5 days but it stretches to 8 days.? because this is quite important for the answer to your post.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #13 12417686
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    If this were to be planned then I would not need control from the network.
  • #14 12417735
    W0jtek92
    Level 39  
    Posts: 3852
    Help: 469
    Rate: 1253
    Ok. What kind of boiler and its programmer do you have? what will it be? such info is important.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #15 12417955
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    blur wrote:
    I can implement this by wire but I still don't see an alternative to either valves or LAN control


    Electrically controlled radiator valves are available.

    For example, the Fibaro Danfoss TWA-A NO 220V mentioned in the Forum.

    As for sensors (simple room thermostats won't do the job here anymore) but it would be nice if the user had room setting options.

    check:
    i-sab.co.uk - distributed
    Sterbox - integrated plc
    LanKontroller - cheap wonder
  • #17 12417978
    W0jtek92
    Level 39  
    Posts: 3852
    Help: 469
    Rate: 1253
    Well then you will be able to regulate the boiler via the main controller. Well then you need to look around for manifolds and actuators for them, Plus one CONCRETE room controller for sms or internet operation. Tell me if you want to do it yourself or through some company?
  • #18 12418024
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    stkop wrote:
    blur wrote:
    I can implement this by wire but I still don't see an alternative to either valves or LAN control


    Electrically controlled radiator valves are available.

    For example, the Fibaro Danfoss TWA-A NO 220V mentioned in the Forum.

    As for sensors (simple room thermostats won't do the job here anymore) but it would be nice if the user had room setting options.

    check:
    i-sab.co.uk - distributed
    Sterbox - integrated plc
    LanKontroller - cheap wonder


    unfortunately, the subjective feelings of the household members confirm me in the desirability of centralised management, example - winter about -15 outside in the house a comfortable 20-22, all the household members walk in long sleeves (the norm) but the stubborn mother-in-law in a short sleeve and every now and then turns the head up to the maximum. now she either falls from the cold or wears a jumper, she does not add to the fuel.
  • #19 12418030
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    W0jtek92 wrote:
    Well then you will be able to control the boiler via the main controller. Well then you need to look around for manifolds and actuators for them, To that one CONCRETE room controller for sms or internet operation. Tell me if you want to do it yourself or by some company?


    After all, blur wrote that a manifold is not an option. It's all about zonal temp control, not the main room controller.... well he's just looking into it and that's why he's asking on the forum.

    Added after 3 [minutes]:

    blur wrote:

    unfortunately, the subjective feelings of the household confirm me in the desirability of centralized management, example - winter about -15 outside in the house comfortable 20-22, all the household members walk in long sleeves (the norm) but the stubborn mother-in-law in a short sleeve and every now and then turns the head to the maximum. now either falls from the cold or dresses a jumper, to the fuel does not contribute.


    This makes it significantly easier. If optimal for you is to control only from interfaces via the internet then there are quite a few solutions.
  • #20 12418049
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    W0jtek92 wrote:
    Well then you will be able to control the boiler via the main controller. Well then you need to look around for manifolds and actuators for them, To that one CONCRETE room controller for sms or internet operation. Tell me if you want to do it yourself or by some company?


    But this controller does not allow you to lower the temperature below 45 degrees, are you talking about manifolds like for underfloor heating ? if so that is out of the question I will not run 3x more pipes copper is in the price. What specific controller do you recommend ?
  • #21 12418349
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    How many zones are you planning? Have you checked whether your solid fuel boiler allows for quite dynamic changes on the furnace [radiator] load side?
  • #22 12418829
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    6-8 zones, the cooker is quietly performing and very responsive, it has quite a large capacity and holds 50 degrees at all times so the water from the panels and the installation is not able to "muddy it up".
  • #23 12424943
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    blur wrote:
    6-8 zones, the cooker quietly performs and responds very quickly, it has quite a large capacity and holds 50 degrees all the time so the water from the panels and the installation is not able to "muddy it up".


    My fear from this angle is that if your furnace charge starts to run at 100% and by chance the demand drops to 0%, will the excess energy be stored before the furnace has time to cool down.... well that's "just" my concern.

    I can suggest you something that I think is optimal [as I think it will come out inexpensive], but it is unfortunately quite a young product, so I suggest "with a little" distance. Reminiscent in principle of the eSterownik [by the way, it's a shame you can't control loads from this platform, because you'd have the topic out of the way] it is:

    "NEL32M3v1.0 universal controller:
    16 digital inputs of DS18B20 temperature transmitters, 6 relay outputs, RS485 master, Ethernet, works with dimenonline.eu platform" from the NovelElectronics offer.

    The DS18b20 is the most common electronic temperature sensor to be placed, for example, under the frame of a white fixture. [find out how long the leads can be and use a recomed cable]. 6 outputs {for heads e.g. the ones I gave earlier [unless they suggest something else]} if not enough then more can be added via an additional executive module.
  • #24 12426723
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    I am not worried about the cooker, it has a number of safeguards and a situation where all the valves are closed at once is unlikely to occur, there would have to be a system failure.
    It is a great pity that the ester controller does not have the possibility of zone regulation of heating, then one software and the whole heating system would be under control. You should simply write to the manufacturer with this proposal, maybe it is in the plans? I have read a little about NEL but I do not see here the possibility of defining heating zones and at least not in the demo account. I am very familiar with this temperature sensor.
  • #25 12426918
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    I think with Nel it will do because even though there is no such presentation in the demo, considering the amount of inputs/outputs they can implement into the "system" shows that the software should show enough flexibility. As for www info there is no rule, companies present 5%, 100% or 500% of the products true capabilities. A question of awareness of the role of marketing. As for eSterownik... ask the manufacturer. Intuitively, I feel that you are in for a positive disappointment, as such functionality is just asking for it.
  • #26 12428516
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    I see that this system is some kind of early beta I don't have time to play with, I'm looking for a ready-made solution that works.
  • #28 12428870
    blur
    Level 22  
    Posts: 673
    Help: 12
    Rate: 58
    i think I'm going to test Z-Wave, just one room to start with and see how it works out in practice, at the most I'll blow 500PLN ;)
  • ADVERTISEMENT