logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Wiring a 260 m² house for future IB/KNX smart system: 4x2x0.5 enough?

mt69 9582 16
Best answers

Is two or three 4x2x0.5 twisted-pair cables enough for future smart-home wiring, and which cable types should be used for KNX/IB control, LAN, CCTV and outdoor links in a 260 m² house?

Two or three 4x2x0.5 cables between the main switchboard and the attic should cover a lot of future low-current needs, but for the gateway/outdoor runs it is better to use higher-grade shielded cabling: SFTP for the gateway, FTP for longer in-house runs, and UTP only for very short links [#13205374] For bus-style smart-home systems, twisted pair is the right medium because differential interfaces like RS-485 rely on it; a star-wired twisted pair can work as a bus, but it is the least favourable layout for communication quality [#13209493][#13206208] If you already plan 4x2x0.5 to each switch box, it can also be used for relay/control input wiring, so keeping both the 4x1.5 power wiring and the twisted pair gives you flexibility for future systems [#13205849][#13206208] Consider more spacious flush boxes such as Multiwall, because future modules, dimmers, PIRs and power supplies often do not fit well in standard boxes [#13210244] Also add extra infrastructure now: temperature sensors in rooms, audio sockets or central audio wiring, a ceiling power+HDMI point for a projector, reed-switch points at doors/windows, a central 12 VDC supply, and at least three large conduits from the distribution board to the attic; outside, use a tough PE-pipe-like conduit for gate/intercom runs [#13205374][#13209882][#13231758]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 13205216
    mt69
    Level 12  
    Posts: 68
    Rate: 18
    I am preparing to carry out an electrical installation in a new single-storey house of 260m2.
    The installation is to be made so that IB technology can be used in the future.
    Unfortunately, there are no plans as of today which IB system is to be used in the future, so the future part of the installation has to be laid head on.

    The main switchgear will be located on the ground floor, while all low-current installations (LAN, TV, CCTV, SSWIN) will probably be located in the attic (loft). Between these locations I plan to lay two or three 4x2x0.5 twisted-pair cables (will this be enough?).

    Functionality for "today":
    lighting will be switched traditionally, possibly on bistable relays, maybe some dimmer.
    external lighting in front of the house (twilight sensor, motion detectors, switch in the house)
    roller shutters on central controllers mounted in the switchboard.
    entrance and garage door – remote control + buttons in garage

    Functionality for the future: INTELLIGENT BUILDING SYSTEM

    I intend to:
    - from each lighting point to the switchboard lay YDYpżo 3x1.5m2 terminated at the switchboard on ZUG
    - from each switch box to the distribution board YDYp 4x1.5m2 terminated in the distribution board on ZUG + twisted pair 4x2x0.5 (4x1.5 so that a double or triple switch can be installed today)
    - flush-mounted boxes for the installation of electronic components, deep, series SIMET SE2x60G (in case some controllers need to be installed in the boxes one day)
    http://www.simet.com.pl/pl/produkt/puszka-do-istalacji-elementow-elektronicznych-podtynkowa-gleboka-szeregowa-niebieski-34159203
    - from each roller shutter to the distribution board YDYpżo 4x1.5m2 terminated in the distribution board on the ZUG
    - from the garage door to the distribution board YDYpżo 4x1.5m2 terminated in the distribution board on ZUG + twisted pair 4x2x0.5.
    - from the entrance gate to the distribution board YKY 4x1.5m2 terminated in the distribution board on ZUG + gel-filled twisted pair 4x2x0.5.
    - video intercom from the wicket door to the distribution board YKY3X1.5 + cable XSTDYz 14x0.5 mm (gel-filled)
    - video-intercom on the house side to YTDY 8x0.5 distribution board
    - from the central heating cooker and control box twisted-pair cable 4x2x0.5 to the distribution board
    - alarm installation made entirely with YTDY 8x0.5 (connections directly to control panel)
    - cCTV installation made with twisted pair 4x2x0.5
    - LAN: of course twisted-pair 4x2x0.5 + gel-filled twisted-pair cable from around the wicket (maybe some peszel if there is a chance for optical fibre in the future)
    - TV – from the roof 5 x coax, and in the house coax + YTLYp 4x0,12 (flat phone for the splitter)

    I will try to convince the investor to put some not too large 19” rack in the attic, where the installations could be placed: LAN, CCTV, TV

    I plan to distribute the control cables in the distribution board using LSA connectors mounted on the socket

    And now the questions:
    1. Which twisted pair cable should I use for CAT5 or maybe CAT6, FTP or UTP?
    2. Which twisted pair cable should be used for IB control cat.5 or cat.6, FTP or UTP?
    3. Should I use a 4x2x0.5 twisted pair cable for the IB lighting boxes or maybe FTP 4x0.8 as recommended by NEXWELL, the manufacturer of the NEXO system. Should it ever be decided to install this system will it work on twisted pair. Because with KNX there will be no problem on twisted pair.
    4. Is there anything I have left out in the wiring?

    Any advice and comments welcome.

    And there is one more issue about which I have no idea.
    The investor would like to have loudspeakers in the bathroom, kitchen and I don't know where else, in which the miuzik is supposed to flow.
    Maybe you have some ideas, because all I can think of so far is a radio broadcasting system - the kind that used to be in workplaces, with a knob to turn down :)
    What equipment, what installation - I have no idea.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 13205374
    tomix
    Level 16  
    Posts: 349
    Help: 7
    Rate: 98
    I am also thinking more and more seriously about a smart home, with the difficulty that the house is already standing ;) The plus is that I got it, and I can use the funds accumulated for "upgrading".
    In line with your plans: use better cables for telco installations, the cost per 1mb is not staggering, and you are assured of eliminating interference (especially if the twisted pair is long or you let it outside the house). Use SFTP cables for the gateway, FTP for longer distances in the house, forget about UTP unless you want to connect the set-top box with the switch at a distance of 2m. I don't know if it makes sense to charge money for a CCTV installation, you need a DVR, power line and other bits and pieces. If you want a kosher solution, base the monitoring on IP cameras. Likewise with intercoms - look at IP video intercoms, where you connect the gate part to the intranet as well as the home part + an app for android / iphone operation. If you want to have both a video intercom + ipcam at the gate, consider a better twisted pair, or two - you can always use switches to increase bandwidth thanks to the 802.3ad standard. Returning to the house - you can plan a temperature sensor in each room that goes to the switchboard, and consider placing audio sockets in the corners of the room so that you don't have to run wires in the skirting boards depending on the location of the hi-fi equipment (or audio sockets to a centralised point). Make a power + hdmi socket somewhere in the ceiling for a future projector (I have one and recommend it). Run each network socket (rj45) out to a single point in the crossover panel hanging. Run as many pairs of wires as loops into the cabinets where you have modular manifolds for central heating (radiators/floors) - at some point you'll probably put solenoid valves in there to control the radiators/heating loops. I know from experience that a set of wires is useful on the roof - air conditioning, solar, photovoltaic panels, aerials. If you have a telephone (pstn) installation in the house run all the sockets down to one patch panel. At the windows / doors you can make outlets for reed switches - opening sensors, I don't trust radio solutions.

    So much for my ideas.
  • #3 13205849
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    mt69 wrote:
    - from each switch box to the distribution board YDYp 4x1.5m2 terminated in the distribution board on ZUG + twisted pair 4x2x0.5 (4x1.5 so that a double or triple switch can be installed today)
    - sIMET SE2x60G flush-mounted boxes for the installation of electronic components, deep, in series (in case some controllers need to be installed in the boxes one day)
    http://www.simet.com.pl/pl/produkt/puszka-do-...dtynkowa-gleboka-szeregowa-niebieski-34159203


    - Since it's going to be 4x2x0.5 to each junction box anyway, I guess you could consider ditching the 4x1.5? I think this twisted pair could be used to control the relays in the switchboard. Alternatively, you could add a bus cable [a dozen boxes connected by one FTP].

    - Have you considered Multiwall boxes [also from Simet] instead of shoeboxes? They seem more functional to me. Info about Multiwall
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 13206147
    mt69
    Level 12  
    Posts: 68
    Rate: 18
    tomix wrote:
    Apply SFTP cables to the gateway, FTP for longer distances in the house, forget UTP unless you want to connect the set-top box with the switch over a distance of 2m.

    As for FTP it's OK, but laying SFTP is probably overkill. If I'm wrong then please set me straight.

    tomix wrote:
    I don't know if it makes sense to load cash into a CCTV installation, you need a DVR, power line and other bits and bobs for that. If you want a kosher solution base the monitoring on IP cameras.

    As I wrote, I'm going to lay a twisted pair cable for CCTV that can run IP cameras as well as the others.

    tomix wrote:
    Returning to the house - in each room you can plan for a temperature sensor going out to the switchboard,

    I hadn't thought of that, but I'll have to discuss it with the builder, as I don't yet know how the CO issue will be solved.

    tomix wrote:
    think about possibly arranging audio sockets in the corners of the room so as not to pull wires in the skirting boards depending on the location of the hi-fi equipment (or audio sockets to a centralised point).

    I thought of this too, but didn't mention anything, as rather my post is about the part of the installation that is supposed to be „intelligent&#8221 in the future;

    tomix wrote:
    Make somewhere in the ceiling a power + hdmi socket for a future projector (I have one and recommend it).

    As for the ceiling, this will always be an open issue as there is no concrete ceiling and the ceiling is plasterboard and access from the loft side will be non stop. I would like to add that all installations will be carried out in the attic in cable trays, or in mesh cable ducts (except for sockets, which will be laid in the floor).
    I want to ensure that in the walls the cables run only vertically, in line with switches, sensors, controllers, etc.

    stkop wrote:
    - Since there is going to be 4x2x0.5 to each switch box anyway, I guess you could consider dispensing with the 4x1.5? I think this twisted pair could be used to control the relays in the switchboard. Alternatively, you could add a bus cable [a dozen boxes connected by one FTP].
    - Have you considered Multiwall boxes [also from Simet] instead of shoeboxes? They seem more functional to me


    Can't these twisted pairs arranged in a star work as a bus?
    I don't think I can give up the 4x1.5 because the relays I mentioned I only want to use for lighting where there is a need for stairwell on/off, and if one day the choice falls on the LCN system it will be as good as it gets.

    I have never used the Multiwall boxes. Can you write a few words why they seem more functional to you?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 13206208
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    A twisted pair arranged in a star can work as a bus, but this is the least favourable situation in terms of communication quality. In short, it can mean problems ... but it doesn't have to... a question of scale... how many arms in total there will be, what distances, how many devices will be installed as buses. The advantage of this solution is that you can support yourself with these wires as a switch to NO/NC inputs.

    You can read more about multivalves here: http://inteldom.blogspot.com/2012/08/simet-nowe-modele-puszek-instalacyjnych.html
  • #6 13209435
    Aman Callede
    Level 17  
    Posts: 161
    Help: 20
    Rate: 9
    I will, as it were, ask those more knowledgeable on the subject: Is there any particular reason why the most commonly suggested cable for smart installation is twisted pair? Wouldn't it be better to use YTDY type cable (of the type used in alarm installations) e.g. 8x0.5 ?
  • #7 13209493
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    Aman Callede wrote:
    Is there any particular reason why the most commonly suggested cable for smart installation is twisted pair?


    Yes. This applies to so-called bus connections based on a differential interface, e.g. RS-485 and derivatives.

    "RS485-
    communication standard using a differential two-wire
    transmitter and the same receiver. It allows the connection of up to 32 transmitters and
    receivers. It was developed for better (noise immunity) and faster
    data transmission (35 Mbit/s over a distance of up to 10m, 100 kbit/s up to 120m). Using
    transmission cable in the form of a twisted-pair cable, it is possible to eliminate the influence of most
    electromagnetic interference. RS485 is the most commonly used interface
    wired in industrial networks"

    source p.28 : ftp://ztchs.p.lodz.pl/Int_w_sm/IwSM.pdf
  • #8 13209741
    Aman Callede
    Level 17  
    Posts: 161
    Help: 20
    Rate: 9
    stkop wrote:
    Yes. This applies to so-called bus connections based on a differential interface e.g. RS-485 and derivatives....


    OK - every bus has "its" optimum cables for a given transmission and this is not debatable.

    My question, however, is not about the bus but about the "ordinary" low-voltage control cable in the type of smart installation referred to in this thread, i.e., for example, the cable connecting the keys on the walls to the centrally located programmable controller. In that case we are not dealing with a bus.
  • #9 13209765
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    Aman Callede wrote:
    My question, however, is not about the bus but about the "ordinary" low-voltage control cable in the type of smart installation referred to in this thread, i.e., for example, the cable connecting the keys on the walls to the centrally located programmable controller. In that case we are not dealing with a bus.


    In this case there is no need for twisted pair cable....

    On the electrode you can find some discussion on this topic: Link
  • #10 13209782
    Aman Callede
    Level 17  
    Posts: 161
    Help: 20
    Rate: 9
    The question arose from the fact that in most cases anyone doing this type of DIY installation always assumes the use of twisted pair. On the other hand, Satel, for example, advises against the use of twisted pair. So I wonder what is the reason for this attachment to twisted-pair used as control cable in this type of installation. Is it a matter of price, the popularity of twisted pair as such (as YTDY type cables are not so widespread) or simply the repetition of the scheme? Perhaps in practice both types of cable will perform exactly the same in such applications, although such a comparison is unfortunately difficult to make.

    Thanks for the link - I used to look for something on this subject but didn't come across this thread.
  • #11 13209882
    And41x1
    Level 26  
    Posts: 700
    Help: 80
    Rate: 193
    I will describe the problems I observe in already wired houses, during white installation and
    initial use.
    Twisted pair quality and throughput disappointment - requirements grow quickly and it is worth putting on a class better than assumed, and it happens that the quality described, is not confirmed in practice. Possibly also due to poor alignment.
    A central 12VDC power supply is useful - it is a pity to desperately search for places, for plug-in power supplies, in places of assumed aesthetics (video intercom monitors, etc.) and in places of uncontrolled temperature, such as the attic with RTV and SAT installation elements.
    The boxes proposed by stkop , would also facilitate installation and upgrades in many places.
    On the outside, a really spade- and rodent-proof pessel, which is effectively a PE water pipe.
  • #12 13210160
    mt69
    Level 12  
    Posts: 68
    Rate: 18
    Looking at your discussion, I come to the conclusion that it is impossible to prepare a truly universal installation. Different building automation systems prefer different types of control cables as well as different ways of laying these installations (starred, bus in loop, etc.)

    And41x1 wrote:
    I will describe the problems I observe in already wired houses, during white installation and
    initial use.
    Twisted pair quality and throughput disappointment - requirements grow quickly and it is worth putting on a class better than assumed, and it happens that the quality described, is not confirmed in practice. Possibly also due to poor alignment.
    A central 12VDC power supply is useful - it is distressing to have to search desperately for places, for plug-in power supplies, in places with assumed aesthetics (video intercom monitors, etc.) and in places with uncontrolled temperatures, such as the attic with RTV and SAT components.
    The boxes proposed by stkop , would also facilitate installation and upgrades in many places.
    On the outside, really spade and rodent proof pessel, which is effectively PE water pipe.

    So what twisted pair should I use for my project so that I don't have the problems you write about in the future?

    Do I understand correctly that the idea of putting an ICT "centre" in the attic is not the best?

    And cans with pockets (bots) do not work?

    Arot corrugated pipe I think can replace PE pipe with dignity - laid in one piece, gentle curves.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #13 13210244
    stkop
    Level 15  
    Posts: 121
    Help: 14
    Rate: 7
    mt69 wrote:
    Looking at your discussion, I come to the conclusion that it is impossible to prepare a truly universal installation. Different building automation systems prefer different types of control cables as well as different ways of laying these installations (starred, bus-in-loop, etc.)


    There is nothing to be paranoid about. It's not like it's terribly zero-one. Just because a solution favours a certain type of cable or its location structure does not mean that it ex officio excludes other solutions.

    mt69 wrote:
    Do I understand correctly that the idea of placing an ICT "centre" in the attic is not the best?


    Apparently statistically electronics in attics are more vulnerable to lightning.... but this may just be a myth.

    mt69 wrote:
    And cans with pockets (bots) don't work?


    This is not the point... As the way electrical wiring has evolved, the volume of space in electrical boxes has changed. The shoe is an invention created for installers of systems with modules for junction boxes (the so-called lozenges) [e.g. LCN]... but now things have become so colourful that sometimes you need somewhere to fit a power supply, or a switch with a built-in dimmer or PIR detector.... + e.g. a relay of some kind.... an electronics board to control infrared or leds.... all sorts of things.
    Multiwalls just give you a better chance that all these bits and bobs can somehow fit in there. It's just that at the moment they're probably the widest flush-mounted boxes suitable for mounting traditional switches.
  • #14 13210458
    mt69
    Level 12  
    Posts: 68
    Rate: 18
    stkop wrote:

    This is not the point... As the way electrical wiring has evolved, the volume of space in electrical boxes has changed. The shoe is an invention created for installers of systems with modules for junction boxes (so-called lozenges) [e.g. LCN]... except that it has now become so colourful that sometimes you need somewhere to fit a power supply, or a switch with a built-in dimmer or PIR detector.... + e.g. a relay of some kind.... an electronics board to control infrared or leds.... all sorts of things.
    Multiwalls just give you a better chance that all these bits and bobs can somehow fit in there. It's just that at the moment they're probably the widest flush-mounted boxes suitable for mounting traditional switches.

    I had such a cunning plan to mount "shoes" in the places of all the switches.
    If there were to be, for example, three switches in a triple frame then install three "shoes".
    Maybe a bit overkill, but better to have a spare than not.
  • #15 13212789
    And41x1
    Level 26  
    Posts: 700
    Help: 80
    Rate: 193
    mt69 wrote:
    This is what twisted pair cable to use for my project so that in the future there won't be the problems you write about?

    In an average sprawling building, ... unknown quality twisted pair 5e cable is going to cause capacity problems. Then the quality of the terminal equipment and doubts about the correctness of the routing (e.g. fixing with staples,... multiple, sharp bends) also come out
    ..So we are looking for guaranteed quality performance.... e.g. -
    http://www.dipol.com.pl/przewod_netset_box_utp_5e_skretka_wewnetrzna_305m__E1408_305.htm
    More on this topic on the web... e.g. here -
    http://forum.pclab.pl/topic/871156-Skr%C4%99tka-kat-5e-czy-kat-6/

    mt69 wrote:
    Do I understand correctly that the idea of putting an ICT "centre" in the attic is not the best?


    Good RTV SAT equipment, can withstand a lot when it comes to extreme temperatures,. especially in a ventilated RACK... power supply, even the best, I would prefer to guard against such temperatures - durability.
    Antenna cables, I customarily protect - http://www.dipol.com.pl/zabezpieczenie_przeci...we_tv-sat_wtyk_f-_gniazdo_f_signal_R48602.htm
    ..with good protected cable, will protect, from lightning in the neighbour.... only.

    mt69 wrote:
    And cans with pockets (bots) don't work?


    Shoeboxes in places where, certainly or presumably, there will be some aftermarket modules, and Multiwall in the rest, just in case and for ease of installation / upgrade.

    mt69 wrote:
    Arot corrugated pipe can probably replace PE pipe with dignity - laid in one piece, gentle curves.


    Decent... but will it take effortless and pilotless, just a hundred seconds to push 25 metres, three strands? - the plumbing is only slightly less susceptible, but can be twisted to the wicket post.... It's also worth comparing performance and prices.
  • #16 13213383
    mt69
    Level 12  
    Posts: 68
    Rate: 18
    And41x1 wrote:
    Gods... but is pushing 25 metres, .....

    That's why I'll be pulling in instead of pushing in. :D :sm9:
  • #17 13231758
    greg16
    Level 15  
    Posts: 137
    Help: 9
    Rate: 37
    Hello . I have never had the opportunity to perform intelligent installation on the PLC, but some of my installations, to a greater or lesser extent, contained a substitute of automation implemented on the alarm system . Without any problems, on an alarm system expanded, of course, with I/0 expanders, GSM, and various sensors, I realized various functions of light control, roller shutters, water valves, temperature, permanently plugged-in devices, etc . As far as installations are concerned, in my case: 4x1.5 from each lamp, passing through the switch (in case of need) + from the switch a twisted pair, from roller shutters 4x1.5 also passing through the switch of the shutter + a twisted pair, in addition I run wires to the central heating distributor and the boiler room. If the option of controlling the heating is taken into account, each zone will receive a 3x1 cable for the thermostat + optionally a twisted pair, while the remaining non-controlled circuits, i.e. sockets, will receive a 3x2.5 cable. Sockets which are to be controlled in the future - 3x2.5 cable straight to the distribution board. In addition, a thick conduit (Arot 50 or PE) is laid outside for the gate automatics and intercom, and at least 3 fi 23 conduits from the distribution board to the attic. If the investor's funds allow, the installation is made entirely in a conduit (fi 13, 16, 18, 21, 23 750N). In such an installation it is possible to make various changes by adding cables or replacing them with new ones. Installations are made for years!
ADVERTISEMENT