logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Control of lights and roller shutters - INT-ORS satellite expander

pik_1 9231 3
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 13577419
    pik_1
    Level 9  
    Posts: 11
    Rate: 2
    Hello,
    Based on the archives of this forum, I have drawn a wiring diagram of the lighting connection to the INT-ORS expanders in order to realise the possibility of controlling the lighting in the house:

    Control of lights and roller shutters - INT-ORS satellite expander

    The expander controls 7 lighting circuits, the 8th output is used to switch off all circuits. The purpose is to achieve:
    1. switching on and off the light with a standard switch.
    2. switching off all circuits, e.g. when an alarm is activated.
    3. to remotely switch on lights to simulate the presence of household members.
    4. control of night-time, external lighting by means of e.g. movement detectors.

    From the switch cabinet to the recessed contact box I lay a 5 x 1.5 mm cable, from the contact to the bulb at least 3 x 1.5 mm or more conductors for multi-circuit chandeliers. I make the connections in the contact box.

    I have drawn a similar diagram for the control of external blinds:

    Control of lights and roller shutters - INT-ORS satellite expander

    The installation requires laying 6 x 1.5mm cable to the cabinet and 4 x 1.5mm to the roller shutter. The connections also seem to be most conveniently made in the switch box.

    I'm neither an electrician nor an automation technician, so I don't know what the advantages and disadvantages are of using satel expanders, or this solution, or whether it's OK. The advantage I notice is that you can always connect the wires in the switchboard and use the installation "classically".
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 13592892
    pik_1
    Level 9  
    Posts: 11
    Rate: 2
    I understand that the lack of response and possible criticism indicates that the layout is correct.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 13595031
    pafciowaw
    Automation specialist
    Posts: 2439
    Help: 480
    Rate: 364
    The circuit is correct, but....
    it only allows to "disable" the manual control and possibly simulate the presence in the house; and yet, something more is required from "intelligent control", e.g. switching on lights for a certain time, switching on lighting sequences for assumed purposes - light scenes.
    Intelligent (selective) switching of 230 sockets (in "children's" rather not, but sometimes you have to)
    In a nutshell - you do a combination of alarm (security and standby) and, on occasion, switching off lights and lowering roller blinds.
  • #4 13596314
    pik_1
    Level 9  
    Posts: 11
    Rate: 2
    True, this will be simple automation, but sufficient for typical users. It will make it possible, for example, to switch off lights or certain sockets (e.g. for an iron) centrally when leaving the house and to simulate the presence of users remotely. However, it is more about solutions such as switching on the lighting when the garage door is opened to avoid entering a dark room, switching on the night light in the corridor or bathroom when a household member's movement is detected ... etc. ...
ADVERTISEMENT