FAQ
TL;DR: WOW vs AUTOCOM: 0 reprogramming is needed if you copy WOW firmware into AUTOCOM’s folder; “This can be avoided.” [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]
Why it matters: This FAQ helps independent techs decide software, streamline connector handling, and switch tools without downtime.
Quick Facts
- Communication capability is the same when the same CDP/"can" interface is used. [Elektroda, robokop, post #16796071]
- WOW Würth adds a wiring/repair database similar to AD, aiding diagnostics beyond basic DTCs. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16795776]
- You can avoid reflashing between WOW and AUTOCOM by copying WOW firmware into AUTOCOM’s firmware directory. [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]
- A Multidiag head runs WOW/Delphi without extra programming steps. [Elektroda, szymitsu21, post #16797157]
- Real-world confirmation: the copy‑firmware method works in practice. [Elektroda, autoas, post #17048972]
Which is better for communication: WOW Würth or AUTOCOM?
For ECU communication, they perform the same when you use the same CDP/“can” interface. The interface quality matters most. As one expert put it, communication is “the same in everyone—it depends on the ‘can’ itself.” Choose the UI and database you prefer. [Elektroda, robokop, post #16796071]
Can WOW run on an AUTOCOM/Delphi CDP (“gold”) interface?
Yes. Users run WOW on a CDP originally used with AUTOCOM/Delphi. The key is placing WOW’s firmware files in AUTOCOM’s firmware folder. That avoids repeated reprogramming while keeping the same hardware. This lets one interface support two platforms efficiently. [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]
How do I switch between WOW and AUTOCOM without reflashing each time?
Use this 3-step snippet:
- Install both applications.
- Copy WOW’s firmware files into AUTOCOM’s firmware directory.
- Start the target app and connect to vehicle.
This eliminates reflash delays during tool swaps. “This can be avoided.” [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]
Does the copy‑firmware method actually work in the field?
Yes. A user confirmed success after applying the firmware copy approach. This field validation shows the method is practical for day‑to‑day shop workflows and reduces downtime. It’s a simple change with immediate impact. [Elektroda, autoas, post #17048972]
Is WOW’s database an advantage over AUTOCOM/Delphi?
WOW includes a service database with wiring diagrams, similar to AD. That helps beyond code reading by guiding tests and repairs. If you value guided information and schematics inside the same app, WOW provides an edge for information depth. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16795776]
Which software do users prefer: Delphi or WOW?
Some technicians prefer Delphi for everyday work, citing familiarity and comfort with its CDP interface. Preference is subjective, so testing both on your vehicles is recommended to see which workflow fits you best. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16796242]
What’s a Multidiag head, and does it need programming?
A Multidiag head is a compatible VCI head that runs WOW/Delphi without extra programming. In practice, users report zero additional programming steps needed. That saves time when changing software stacks or vehicles. [Elektroda, szymitsu21, post #16797157]
What is a CDP/DS150E interface in this context?
CDP/DS150E refers to the common Delphi/AUTOCOM vehicle communication interface used with these platforms. It’s the hardware “head” that links your PC app to the vehicle through OBD or make‑specific connectors. Users discuss DS150 and CDP directly in this thread. [Elektroda, ALIBABA I, post #16796135]
What is CAN bus, in simple terms?
CAN bus is a vehicle network standard that lets ECUs communicate over a two‑wire bus with arbitration and error handling. Your VCI and software talk to ECUs via CAN to read data and run tests. [CiA, 2016]
Any pitfalls or edge cases when swapping between WOW and AUTOCOM?
If you don’t use the copy‑firmware method, you may wait for the VCI to update each time you switch apps. That delay feels like a reflash cycle and slows workflow. Plan to avoid this by staging firmware. [Elektroda, autoas, post #16796933]
Is AUTOCOM still actively improving?
One user observed that “Autocom seems to have stopped in development.” Treat this as experiential feedback, not an official roadmap. Evaluate current releases yourself to confirm coverage and functions you need. [Elektroda, autoas, post #16796181]
How can I verify coverage for a specific car before committing?
Load both tools and test connectivity and functions on a sample vehicle. A contributor even offered to check specific models on request. Hands‑on testing remains the most reliable coverage proof. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16796242]
