logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Advanced Search
logo elektroda

[Solved] WOW Wurth vs AUTOCOM: Comparing Diagnostic Features & Connector Handling Efficiency

autoas 42609 14
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
Report a violation of the law
| New topic
  • #1 16795745
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    Hello!
    Do you have any opinion which better WOW Wurth or AUTOCOM ..... diagnostically, in the sense of handling through the connector .....
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #2 16795776
    mario 77
    Level 23  
    Posts: 510
    Help: 66
    Rate: 335
    I would rather think AUTOCOM or even better DELPHI but it's a matter of taste. WOW WURTH has a database, something like AD with schemas.
  • #3 16795787
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    I am not talking about the base only for communication with cars ....
  • Helpful post
    #4 16796071
    robokop
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 29406
    Help: 1760
    Rate: 6342
    Communication is probably the same in everyone - it depends on the "can" itself, in different scenes, about which a lot has already been written here.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • Helpful post
    #5 16796135
    ALIBABA I
    Level 33  
    Posts: 2570
    Help: 217
    Rate: 528
    Hello col. And how would you get bargained on DS 150 I checked it perfectly

    And system 32.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 16796181
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    I have a gold "can" (CDP) and Autocom .... it's good, Wurth can walk on it and I wonder
    Autocom seems to have stopped in development ...
  • Helpful post
    #7 16796242
    mario 77
    Level 23  
    Posts: 510
    Help: 66
    Rate: 335
    As for me, you will not feel the difference in communication. I have a CDP interface from Delphi and from a friend once I got a WOW, I used several times but somehow I prefer DELPHI. And if you have a "raisin" and would like to know what you can do in it, or if there is such a model available then I can check you. Generally, it's best if you load it to the test and convince yourself. The interface you have.
  • Helpful post
    #8 16796588
    szymitsu21
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 3702
    Help: 342
    Rate: 1288
    I have one second and third ... how they differ in their external appearance ...
    And at the moment I use CDIFA the earliest and how much more is it known.
  • #9 16796933
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    szymitsu21 wrote:
    I have one second and third.

    Yes, I wanted so much that if I want to WOW, I have to wait for the "can" to be updated and if I want to go back to Autocom, I have to wait for it to reprogram again ...
  • Helpful post
    #10 16796960
    szymitsu21
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 3702
    Help: 342
    Rate: 1288
    autoas wrote:
    szymitsu21 wrote:
    I have one second and third.

    Yes, I wanted so much that if I want to WOW, I have to wait for the "can" to be updated and if I want to go back to Autocom, I have to wait for it to reprogram again ...


    Multidiag is overwhelmed with no programming ... I have it.
  • #11 16797124
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    What does "multidiag"
  • Helpful post
    #12 16797157
    szymitsu21
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 3702
    Help: 342
    Rate: 1288
    autoas wrote:
    What is a "multidiag"


    The head that wow2o delphi without any programming and so on
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #13 16797195
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    Well ok ...
  • Helpful post
    #14 17024106
    leonov
    Level 43  
    Posts: 8906
    Help: 1038
    Rate: 2232
    autoas wrote:
    Yes, I wanted so much that if I want to WOW, I have to wait for the "can" to be updated and if I want to go back to Autocom, I have to wait for it to reprogram again ...
    This can be avoided, the WOW firmware files are copied to the autocom firmware directory and after the case ;-)
  • #15 17048972
    autoas
    Level 42  
    Posts: 9188
    Help: 571
    Rate: 3901
    It works, thanks ..... !!!!!
| New topic
Report a violation of the law

Topic summary

✨ The discussion compares the diagnostic capabilities and connector handling efficiency of WOW Wurth and AUTOCOM. Users express varying preferences, with some favoring AUTOCOM for its performance, while others highlight WOW Wurth's extensive database. Communication efficiency is noted to be similar across platforms, with emphasis on the "can" interface. Users mention the need for updates and reprogramming when switching between systems. The conversation also touches on the Delphi interface, with some users preferring it over WOW Wurth and AUTOCOM. Overall, the choice between these tools appears to be subjective, depending on user experience and specific needs.
Generated by the language model.

FAQ

TL;DR: WOW vs AUTOCOM: 0 reprogramming is needed if you copy WOW firmware into AUTOCOM’s folder; “This can be avoided.” [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]

Why it matters: This FAQ helps independent techs decide software, streamline connector handling, and switch tools without downtime.

Quick Facts

Which is better for communication: WOW Würth or AUTOCOM?

For ECU communication, they perform the same when you use the same CDP/“can” interface. The interface quality matters most. As one expert put it, communication is “the same in everyone—it depends on the ‘can’ itself.” Choose the UI and database you prefer. [Elektroda, robokop, post #16796071]

Can WOW run on an AUTOCOM/Delphi CDP (“gold”) interface?

Yes. Users run WOW on a CDP originally used with AUTOCOM/Delphi. The key is placing WOW’s firmware files in AUTOCOM’s firmware folder. That avoids repeated reprogramming while keeping the same hardware. This lets one interface support two platforms efficiently. [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]

How do I switch between WOW and AUTOCOM without reflashing each time?

Use this 3-step snippet:
  1. Install both applications.
  2. Copy WOW’s firmware files into AUTOCOM’s firmware directory.
  3. Start the target app and connect to vehicle. This eliminates reflash delays during tool swaps. “This can be avoided.” [Elektroda, leonov, post #17024106]

Does the copy‑firmware method actually work in the field?

Yes. A user confirmed success after applying the firmware copy approach. This field validation shows the method is practical for day‑to‑day shop workflows and reduces downtime. It’s a simple change with immediate impact. [Elektroda, autoas, post #17048972]

Is WOW’s database an advantage over AUTOCOM/Delphi?

WOW includes a service database with wiring diagrams, similar to AD. That helps beyond code reading by guiding tests and repairs. If you value guided information and schematics inside the same app, WOW provides an edge for information depth. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16795776]

Which software do users prefer: Delphi or WOW?

Some technicians prefer Delphi for everyday work, citing familiarity and comfort with its CDP interface. Preference is subjective, so testing both on your vehicles is recommended to see which workflow fits you best. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16796242]

What’s a Multidiag head, and does it need programming?

A Multidiag head is a compatible VCI head that runs WOW/Delphi without extra programming. In practice, users report zero additional programming steps needed. That saves time when changing software stacks or vehicles. [Elektroda, szymitsu21, post #16797157]

What is a CDP/DS150E interface in this context?

CDP/DS150E refers to the common Delphi/AUTOCOM vehicle communication interface used with these platforms. It’s the hardware “head” that links your PC app to the vehicle through OBD or make‑specific connectors. Users discuss DS150 and CDP directly in this thread. [Elektroda, ALIBABA I, post #16796135]

What is CAN bus, in simple terms?

CAN bus is a vehicle network standard that lets ECUs communicate over a two‑wire bus with arbitration and error handling. Your VCI and software talk to ECUs via CAN to read data and run tests. [CiA, 2016]

Any pitfalls or edge cases when swapping between WOW and AUTOCOM?

If you don’t use the copy‑firmware method, you may wait for the VCI to update each time you switch apps. That delay feels like a reflash cycle and slows workflow. Plan to avoid this by staging firmware. [Elektroda, autoas, post #16796933]

Is AUTOCOM still actively improving?

One user observed that “Autocom seems to have stopped in development.” Treat this as experiential feedback, not an official roadmap. Evaluate current releases yourself to confirm coverage and functions you need. [Elektroda, autoas, post #16796181]

How can I verify coverage for a specific car before committing?

Load both tools and test connectivity and functions on a sample vehicle. A contributor even offered to check specific models on request. Hands‑on testing remains the most reliable coverage proof. [Elektroda, mario 77, post #16796242]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT