I came across a pattern in the network that allows me to determine the required cable cross-section directly so as to maintain the permissible voltage drop (p. 21, pattern 19):
Selection of leads
I don't know if I fully understand it correctly. I would like to use it to determine the voltage drop of the cable for powering the capacitor. Assuming that the capacitor has something cos fi = 0, the formulas show that the voltage drop is 0, which conflicts with my intuition and in total probably right, because it should not only take into account the resistance of the cable but also the reactance (which in the mentioned study is written on the next page in determination of voltage drop, e.g. at engine start-up).
Only that it is some inconsistent - for the formula to be applied I should probably put on a real capacitor (which has some resistance) and determine the actual cos fi (which will not come out completely 0, and a little more) and then also take into account the reactance of the cable. But why the contractual treatment in the document on page 15 of a capacitor as an element with cos fi = 0? Is it about simplifying the calculation?
Selection of leads
I don't know if I fully understand it correctly. I would like to use it to determine the voltage drop of the cable for powering the capacitor. Assuming that the capacitor has something cos fi = 0, the formulas show that the voltage drop is 0, which conflicts with my intuition and in total probably right, because it should not only take into account the resistance of the cable but also the reactance (which in the mentioned study is written on the next page in determination of voltage drop, e.g. at engine start-up).
Only that it is some inconsistent - for the formula to be applied I should probably put on a real capacitor (which has some resistance) and determine the actual cos fi (which will not come out completely 0, and a little more) and then also take into account the reactance of the cable. But why the contractual treatment in the document on page 15 of a capacitor as an element with cos fi = 0? Is it about simplifying the calculation?