Best Mini-Oven vs Mid-Range Microwave: Large Dish Fit, Baking Quality, Hot Air & Interior Lighting

piokrza wrote:

I've never had the opportunity to use the hot air, and I see that some models offer it.

Better for sure. In fact, I only use it.

piokrza wrote:

I'm also thinking about a microwave with convection and a grill, if it would be good enough to successfully replace the above oven, I would be willing to invest in it.

It also gives advice, but you have to remember that the heater in such a microwave is only on the top. Unfortunately, I don't know how the thermocouple works in them.
Just like microwaves with an oven function, there are also ovens with a microwave function. Basically the same as the previous device, only the size of an oven

In principle, whatever you buy, it will work the same. The microwave heating option always works the same, because the components are the same. The heater always heats with rated power, and the hot air circulation works the same everywhere. The rest of the options are always an unnecessary gimmick, like a separate function for fish, a separate one for pasta and whatever else the button painter will think of. Apart from microwaves, heating with a heater and possibly convection, you won't even use the rest of the options, unless to check if it works.

antek1cza wrote:

However, I believe that it is also worth using common sense in life, and this is different.

However, I will remain guided by knowledge in the field of physics, and not listening to nonsense that someone writes on the internet.

antek1cza wrote:

Well, dear friend, we have two physics! One supporting the other not microwave.

There is no physics either for or against microwaves. Instead, there is one saying that electromagnetic radiation of the appropriate frequency increases the amplitude of vibrations of atoms, and that microwave radiation, like no other electromagnetic radiation, does not penetrate metals.
And I can't imagine any other way to heat food without increasing the vibrations of its atoms.

antek1cza wrote:

Scientists about the harmfulness of microwaves

These scientists must have had quite a hangover. Sentence from the beginning of the article:
"The microwave works by making the water molecules vibrate at high frequency. This causes the water to turn into a gaseous state - steam, which heats the food."
Or how to make an article idiotic in one sentence. In addition, they constantly write about some research, and there are no sources. Same with jokes about American scientists

antek1cza wrote:

Why are microwave ovens so dangerous? Expert opinion

"PEM - is 10-6?W/cm2 (microwatt per square centimeter - 0.000,001 ?W/cm2)"
Erm... how did they convert ?W/cm2 to ?W/cm2 and got different results?
"why do the eyes burn after working at the computer for a long time? Because they dry out, because they are not properly moisturized. And why are they not properly moisturized? Because the water membranes are destroyed."
Because sitting in front of a monitor, you blink on average 3 times less than normal. I know something about it - I spend over 10 hours a day in front of the computer (because a day is an exaggeration ) And the reason why it doesn't bother me is probably just gel lenses.
"In the human head subjected to a field with a frequency of 300-2000 MHz, energy is concentrated."
The concentration of energy is not possible, by definition. Energy cannot be stored, but it can be processed.
"A muscle nerve exposed to microwaves at 3000 Hz loses its responsiveness within half an hour. " This is more or less true, but it is only due to their fatigue, as they normally work at frequencies of 10-30 Hz.
I'll steal another image from this article:

Assuming that the phone can actually hold a conversation for 20 minutes, that it has enough battery, then heating a head weighing 6 kg by these 2 degrees requires about 50kJ, i.e. 13Wh. The battery in the phone stores about 3.7V*3000mAh=10Wh. Where did the extra 3Wh come from? In addition, almost all the energy is emitted in the phone on its components, and the radio wave does not transmit even 1% of this power. You would know that if you could count the power of an electromagnetic wave, read - you would know quite primitive physics and not read nonsense on the internet.
I don't want to read any further. next article:

antek1cza wrote:

Microwave food - slow death at will

"Hans, it's cold in this Russian forest today... Come on, let's warm up by the radar." That's how it was in the beginning, the Germans initially used microwaves for radar systems, but the problem for these soldiers was the development of blood cancer.
Radars based on the operation of microwaves gave rise to a new contraption. If it was possible to heat the living tissue of soldiers, then it was also possible to heat food for them at many posts during fights with the Russians."
It's actually true that microwaves started on the radar. Radar im microwave is basically the same thing.
And what moron heats soldiers with a microwave? You might as well put your baby in the microwave so he doesn't get cold.
""A microwave oven works like this. The food is bombarded with a stream of particles, as a result of which the atoms go into an excited state, and therefore its internal energy increases. Then, when the food is taken out of the oven, a rapid cooling process occurs as a result of the matter's physical desire to reach a minimum The electrons of the excited atoms return to the proper energy shells, making jumps by one or two shells. At this point, quanta of Gamma radiation are emitted, which are the most penetrating. By eating such food, we expose ourselves to Gamma radiation from the inside and ionization of the atoms of our own body. This leads to irreversible processes of cell destruction, as well as to the radiolysis of water in the body. What does a physicist suffer from? After all, this physicist has as much in common with his profession as doctors in drug advertisements have with medicine.

But why would someone heat the water to water the flowers?

vodiczka wrote:

Did you read post #14 If you read it, you deserved the title "Hard Thinker", if you haven't read it, read it.

But I know they were both chilled. But why cook it before watering? Can a gardener explain?

vodiczka wrote:

You have confirmed that you think hard

Or I don't remember every shit I find on the internet
Both of these experiments, pseudoscientific gibberish, don't make much sense. Let's better return to the choice of the stove.