logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Constant Current Load Circuit to Maintain 400mA for Power Supply Testing

159 21
ADVERTISEMENT
  • #1 21658018
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21658019
    Cody Miller
    Anonymous  
  • #3 21658020
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 21658021
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #5 21658022
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #6 21658023
    Cody Miller
    Anonymous  
  • #7 21658024
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #8 21658025
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #9 21658026
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #10 21658027
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • #11 21658028
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #12 21658029
    Cody Miller
    Anonymous  
  • #13 21658030
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #14 21658031
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • #15 21658032
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #16 21658033
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • #17 21658034
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #18 21658035
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #19 21658036
    Olin Lathrop
    Anonymous  
  • #20 21658037
    Brent Lindsay
    Anonymous  
  • #21 21658038
    Peter Hayles
    Anonymous  
  • #22 21658039
    Bruce Carter
    Anonymous  

Topic summary

✨ The discussion focuses on designing a constant current load circuit to maintain approximately 400mA for power supply testing, ensuring the device under test (DUT) voltage remains stable around 1.5V (range 1.425–1.575V). The load should activate to supplement current when the DUT draws less than 400mA and deactivate when the DUT current demand increases, maintaining a combined constant current. Key challenges include minimizing voltage variation at the DUT, managing supply impedance, and avoiding interference with the DUT ground. A linear circuit approach is preferred to maintain consistent voltage regardless of DUT current fluctuations. Proposed solutions include using a PNP transistor with a zener diode for voltage reference, careful selection of sense resistor values, and consideration of transistor gain and supply impedance. Simulation results indicate voltage variations around 16–18mV for 100mA current changes, corresponding to an effective impedance near 180mΩ, which may be acceptable depending on tolerance. Faster switching introduces voltage spikes, which are undesirable, and adding capacitors on the DUT is not an option due to testing constraints. Alternative simpler solutions suggested include using an LM317 adjustable regulator with a 3Ω resistor to set current, requiring sufficient voltage headroom, and an electronic rheostat circuit for load current independent of applied voltage, with high-side current monitoring via an INA128 instrumentation amplifier. The discussion emphasizes the need for clear voltage variation or impedance specifications to optimize the circuit design.

FAQ

TL;DR: Aim for a 400 mA constant load with ~16 mV swing per 100 mA step; “If you need substantially less than 180 mΩ, this simple circuit isn’t going to do it.” [Elektroda, Olin Lathrop, post #21658031] Why it matters: This keeps your tester’s PSU in a steady operating region so DUT voltage stays tight during dynamic loads, without masking DUT behavior.

Quick-Facts:

Quick Facts

What is the basic goal of this constant-current load setup?

Hold total current at 400 mA so the PSU stays “loaded,” while the electronic load fills in whatever the DUT is not drawing. This reduces supply-induced voltage variation at the DUT during tests. The DUT voltage target is about 1.5 V, within 1.425–1.575 V. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658022]

Will the DUT ever exceed 400 mA on its own?

No. The test constraint is that the DUT will not draw more than 400 mA. That lets you size the supplemental load to maintain 400 mA total without risking an overcurrent on the DUT branch. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658026]

Can I keep the DUT voltage constant without adding capacitors on the DUT?

You can reduce effective source impedance with an active pass element (e.g., PNP plus reference), but it won’t be zero. A sim showed ~16 mV change for a 100 mA step, about 160 mΩ. Define an acceptable voltage variation or impedance target up front. [Elektroda, Olin Lathrop, post #21658031]

Is there a simple linear way to sink about 400 mA?

Yes—use an LM317 as a constant-current sink: place ~3 Ω between OUT and ADJ, and draw load current from the ADJ node. With the LM317’s reference, 3 Ω yields about 0.42 A (1.25 V / 3 Ω). Allow a few volts of headroom. [Elektroda, Peter Hayles, post #21658038]

How do I wire the LM317 constant-current sink (3 steps)?

  1. Connect a 3 Ω, ≥1.5 W resistor from LM317 OUT to ADJ.
  2. Tie the ADJ node to your load; return load to ground.
  3. Feed LM317 IN from the tester PSU, leaving a few volts of margin above the DUT. [Elektroda, Peter Hayles, post #21658038]

What about using a PNP transistor with a zener reference?

A PNP pass device referenced by a zener to the supply can regulate current while keeping the DUT near the intended voltage. This flips a simple NPN concept and avoids disturbing the DUT ground, which you cannot insert parts into. [Elektroda, Olin Lathrop, post #21658025]

Can remote sense lines help maintain the DUT voltage target?

Yes. Since the tester has sense lines, regulate at the DUT pads. The load network then operates with the sensed setpoint, minimizing errors from wiring drops while the load tops up to 400 mA. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658024]

What transient behavior should I expect during fast load steps?

Expect voltage spikes at higher slew rates. A shunt capacitor across the DUT would tame them, but the DUT cannot be bypassed during evaluation, so you must improve loop bandwidth or placement instead. This is a key edge case. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658035]

Why not just add a capacitor across the DUT to stop spikes?

A capacitor works, but test rules may prohibit bypassing the DUT because it masks the DUT’s dynamic response. In such cases, adjust the regulator/load compensation and wiring to control transients instead. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658037]

How low can I push the effective source impedance with a simple pass stage?

A simple pass stage with zener-referenced control showed ~16–18 mV change for a 100 mA step, implying roughly 160–180 mΩ effective impedance at the DUT. Tighter specs require a different topology. “If you need substantially less… isn’t going to do it.” [Elektroda, Olin Lathrop, post #21658031]

Is there a proven constant-current electronic load topology for wide ranges?

Yes. An op-amp–controlled MOSFET “electronic rheostat” keeps load current largely independent of applied voltage. This approach is widely used for supply testing and scales from sub-mA to multi-amp ranges. [“Electronic rheostat provides decades of load resistance”]

What can I use to monitor current on the high side?

A precision instrumentation amplifier such as the INA128 provides high-side current monitoring while the active load regulates. This lets you log true DUT current versus the supplemental load in real time. [Elektroda, Bruce Carter, post #21658039]

Does the sense resistor drop risk upsetting the DUT voltage?

If you place a sense resistor, use remote sensing at the DUT pads to cancel the drop, or keep the resistor small and move sensing upstream. Ask what drop you can allow, then back-calculate the resistor. [Elektroda, Cody Miller, post #21658023]

What compliance/headroom do I need when using the LM317 method?

Leave a few volts above the DUT for the LM317 to regulate at 400 mA. Power the resistor appropriately; three 1 Ω, 1 W parts in series cover ~0.42 A well and improve thermal spread. [Elektroda, Peter Hayles, post #21658038]

What if my DUT current varies from 0 to 200 mA during tests?

Size the load so total current is constant at 400 mA. If the DUT draws 200 mA, the load sinks the remaining 200 mA; if the DUT draws 0 mA, the load sinks the full 400 mA. [Elektroda, Brent Lindsay, post #21658022]
ADVERTISEMENT