logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Toroidal Coil Signal Propagation and Exposure at 200-3000Hz, 500-1000W, 1-6ft Elevation

93 21
ADVERTISEMENT
  • #1 21681432
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21681433
    David Ashton
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 21681434
    Elizabeth Simon
    Anonymous  
  • #4 21681435
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • #5 21681436
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  
  • #6 21681437
    David Ashton
    Anonymous  
  • #7 21681438
    Elizabeth Simon
    Anonymous  
  • #8 21681439
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • #9 21681440
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 21681441
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • #11 21681442
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  
  • #12 21681443
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • #13 21681444
    Elizabeth Simon
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #14 21681445
    David Ashton
    Anonymous  
  • #15 21681446
    Elizabeth Simon
    Anonymous  
  • #16 21681447
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  
  • #17 21681448
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  
  • #19 21681450
    Richard Gabric
    Anonymous  
  • #20 21681451
    Donald Adams
    Anonymous  
  • #21 21681452
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  
  • #22 21681453
    PeterTraneus Anderson
    Anonymous  

Topic summary

The discussion centers on the signal propagation characteristics and exposure considerations of a toroidal (vortex) coil operating in the 200-3000 Hz frequency range at power levels between 500 to 1000 watts, with coil elevation from 1 to 6 feet. The coil's geometry, consisting of multiple slightly tilted one-turn rings in series, produces a near-field magnetic dipole pattern with a vortex effect that slightly reduces dipole field strength but does not alter its shape. Due to the coil's size being much smaller than the wavelength at these frequencies, it behaves as a quasi-static source with limited far-field radiation, resulting in predominantly local, omnidirectional fields with rapid attenuation beyond approximately 15 to 60 feet. This makes it unsuitable for long-distance broadcasting but potentially useful for localized biological exposure experiments. The coil is not a dummy load; it radiates some field but with low efficiency, converting much input power to heat. For compliance with FCC regulations and controlled testing, dummy loads are recommended as they dissipate power without radiation. Calculations of field strength and propagation require electromagnetic modeling using classical antenna theory and quasi-static approximations, referencing texts such as Smythe's "Static and Dynamic Electricity" and Kraus's "Antennas." Practical modeling can be done by segmenting the coil into straight-line elements and applying Neumann's formula. Alternatives like Helmholtz coils or solenoidal coils are suggested for generating uniform, strong fields within a defined volume for biological testing. The discussion also highlights the challenge of achieving strong near fields that sharply diminish with distance and the need for specialized expertise or software for precise electromagnetic modeling.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT