Narek 1 wrote:The matter depends on whether the voltage is constantly higher or whether it fluctuates. If it is permanently too high, it is easier and it is enough to use an autotransformer. It is so much better than a transformer, that the transformer would have to be 10 kW and the autotransformer is enough, I think, 1 kW. However, you need to know what is the permissible current for the winding wire at least in the section that works in series with the network.
To the col. Krzyś33.
You wrote imprecise: power will change, only the energy for which you pay will not change.
djhavay wrote:Complaints were reported to ZE, they measured with their meters and stated that it was 252 V and found it to be within the norm because the contract says that they have 10% tolerance, i.e. it can be even 253 V. I still had to pay PLN 100 for an unfounded call-mockery !
And as for the devices, an ordinary halogen rated at 500 W with my voltage actually consumes 575 W (I measured with a professional meter) I do not know how it is translated into refrigerators or RTV equipment, but I know for sure, because I checked it myself that light bulbs, heating devices and the motors consume more energy, and my reason is that if a higher voltage is applied to the transformer on the primary and higher voltage on the secondary, it is not very healthy for RTV devices, not to mention higher power consumption. Such translations as EC employees such as "the water will heat up faster for you, or the bulb will shine brighter or the engine will spin faster" do not satisfy me
Quote:Did you really call the energy emergency for this Saturday night to Sunday ???
You couldn't wait until Monday and calmly explain in the area what they can and cannot do about your problem?
You could easily get out of paying a cent with a simple question about the accuracy class of "their" meters. Unlikely to have 0.5 or better. And if they had worse, then their measurement did not guarantee that + 10% was not exceeded ...
Quote:I support
People will not please it, but in this case it turned out to be bad
djhavay wrote:Djhavay, these are just your delusions. If it was possible to save on lower voltage, it would have been lowered in the entire EU, not only in Poland, and in the USA where there is 110V, they would screw on 220V bulbs.Quote:I support
People will not please it, but in this case it turned out to be bad
to colleague alfaam: I wish you such tension and I would be curious if you would be satisfied after receiving the energy bill
It is good to criticize someone when everything is okay by yourself
djhavay wrote:That's the only reason why I have to pay 10% more for electricity on average?
djhavay wrote:Quote:I support
People will not please it, but in this case it turned out to be bad
to colleague alfaam: I wish you such tension and I would be curious if you would be satisfied after receiving the energy bill
It is good to criticize someone when everything is okay by yourself
TL;DR: 254 V in a 230 V grid equals +10.4 % over-voltage; "99 % of RTV devices have converters that won't feel it" [Elektroda, Darrieus, post #6315144] File a supply-quality complaint first; use an autotransformer only if voltage stays above 253 V. Why it matters: High mains voltage mainly destroys filament bulbs and shortens appliance life for homes close to the distribution transformer.
• EU EN 50160 allows 230 V ±10 % (207–253 V) at the point of common coupling [EN 50160]. • Forum measurements: 252–254 V daytime at the customer socket [Elektroda, djhavay, post #6314952] • Incandescent power rises ≈21 % for +10 % voltage because P∝V² [Siemens Lighting Guide, 2018]. • Only ≈10 % of the load needs to be wound in an autotransformer (1 kVA for 10 kW) [Elektroda, Narek 1, post #6313608] • Market price for 10 kW single-phase autotransformer: €250–€500 delivered in EU [EU-Tradewatch, 2023].