logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Dostępna jest polska wersja

Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?

Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tam

Raspberry Pi or Arduino for a wireless ultrasonic fuel level sensor over Wi-Fi?

digitronic 3186 6
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 11599504
    digitronic
    Level 9  
    Posts: 6
    Hello
    I have the following problem: I want to monitor the fuel level (coal) in the central heating boiler in the cellar.
    My assumptions are as follows:
    - an ultrasonic distance sensor will measure the fuel level
    - a microcontroller will make the reading available wirelessly (preferably via Wi-Fi) over IP
    - optionally, it will also support an additional temperature sensor

    I was thinking of using a Raspberry Pi with a USB Wi-Fi module, but it doesn’t have analogue inputs for the distance sensor; besides, I like the fact that it runs on Linux and is fully network-compatible.
    Or perhaps an Arduino would be better – here I can connect whatever sensor I want, though the downside is that connecting to Wi-Fi can be problematic, and changing the software requires connecting to a PC.

    What would you recommend?

    PS. I came across a distance sensor with a serial interface somewhere, but I’m still looking into it.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 11599547
    avatar
    Level 36  
    Posts: 4149
    Help: 159
    Rate: 413
    ...The cheapest option would be some sort of GSM module (or an old mobile phone) and a microcontroller.
    Anyway, there are already kits like that on all___o, so maybe it’s just a case of having a look?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 11601102
    Wieslaw Bicz

    Level 18  
    Posts: 241
    Help: 16
    Rate: 14
    This topic has already been discussed at length (https://www.elektroda.pl/rtvforum/topic1549299.html). In the case of coal, the matter is not quite so straightforward, as it does not form a flat surface. A standard ultrasonic sensor is unlikely to be the best solution.
    Company Account:
    PBP Optel sp. z o.o.
    ul. Jerzego Kowalskiego 5, Wrocław (Wrocław-Fabryczna), 52-428 | Company Website: www.optel.eu
  • #4 11604261
    digitronic
    Level 9  
    Posts: 6
    Thanks for the link to the thread; there aren’t any solutions there, but the ideas are interesting.

    Actually, I was really more after some advice on which controller to use.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 11604351
    Wieslaw Bicz

    Level 18  
    Posts: 241
    Help: 16
    Rate: 14
    I understand, but I agree with the views expressed by previous contributors and, of course, I reiterate my own view that measuring the level of carbon and similar substances is not straightforward, as they do not form a level surface. We need to start by resolving this problem.
    Company Account:
    PBP Optel sp. z o.o.
    ul. Jerzego Kowalskiego 5, Wrocław (Wrocław-Fabryczna), 52-428 | Company Website: www.optel.eu
  • #6 11604405
    digitronic
    Level 9  
    Posts: 6
    A carbon level tolerance of 5–10 per cent is not a problem, although I don’t want a simple indication such as ‘high’, ‘medium’ or ‘low’; I would prefer a linear measurement.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #7 11604412
    Wieslaw Bicz

    Level 18  
    Posts: 241
    Help: 16
    Rate: 14
    First, you need to check the sensor you’re planning to use and see what it shows.
    Company Account:
    PBP Optel sp. z o.o.
    ul. Jerzego Kowalskiego 5, Wrocław (Wrocław-Fabryczna), 52-428 | Company Website: www.optel.eu
ADVERTISEMENT