logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Advanced Search
logo elektroda

Regulations for Displaying Monitored Object Plaque in Private Home Monitoring Systems

aodbg1 34614 36
Best answers

Do I have to put up a monitored-property sign for a private home CCTV system, and is it worth posting one as a deterrent?

No, forum replies say there is no obligation to put up a monitored-object sign for a private home system if you are only monitoring your own property [#12196590][#19546643] Several users still recommend hanging a sign anyway as a deterrent, because it may scare off intruders, but it is presented as optional rather than required [#12200406][#12200375] One reply adds that if the camera also records the public road or a neighbor’s property, the situation changes and GDPR/privacy obligations may apply [#19554363][#19546668] So for a camera aimed only at your own yard, a plaque is not needed; if you want extra deterrence, you can post one, but do not rely on a dummy sign alone [#12200406]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
Report a violation of the law
Reply | New topic
  • #31 19554590
    zybex
    Helpful for users  
    Posts: 15888
    Help: 2093
    Rate: 2916
    cichy koksik wrote:
    even if there is no publication or other use of the recordings and photographs obtained from these cameras. Therefore, it is not decisive that the recordings have not been published anywhere or made available to third parties.

    How will my neighbor know if I'm recording anything? After all, I can have dummy cameras, because you can buy them too. By the way, if I wanted to record someone without their knowledge, I would definitely not expose the cameras and hide them cleverly. :wink:
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #32 19554609
    cichy koksik
    Level 17  
    Posts: 857
    Help: 4
    Rate: 82
    kood wrote:
    Besides, I see that in these cases the cameras were installed not to protect their property but to spite the neighbor

    And I see you're interpreting the facts as you see fit.
    In both cases, the court punished the owners of the installed cameras and how they explain is only because they did not want to bear any consequences - it's really hard to understand???

    kood wrote:
    I would like to ask you to indicate where the court refers to the GDPR?


    Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 December 2014, case number C-212/13Private video surveillance and purely personal or household activities

    Added after 6 [minutes]:

    zybex wrote:
    How will my neighbor know if I'm recording anything?

    It's a court order...
    In any case, a neighbor may ask if the cameras mounted on your building/tree/pole looking in his direction cover his area.
    .
    zybex wrote:
    By the way, if I wanted to record someone without their knowledge, I would definitely not expose the cameras and hide them cleverly.

    We're bouncing the ball now :)
    What difference do you see between recording someone with a camera on your house and one that is hidden in the bushes?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #33 19554641
    kood
    CCTV and Stationary Alarms specialist  
    Posts: 1896
    Help: 259
    Rate: 443
    cichy koksik wrote:
    Judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 December 2014, case number C-212/13Private video surveillance and purely personal or household activities


    I'm ending this discussion because you clearly don't even know what you're talking about, you're just pasting what pops up in google without thinking.

    You are only embarrassing yourself by posting judgments from 2014, and the GDPR you refer to entered into force in 2018.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #34 19554677
    cichy koksik
    Level 17  
    Posts: 857
    Help: 4
    Rate: 82
    kood wrote:
    You are only embarrassing yourself by posting judgments from 2014, and the GDPR you refer to entered into force in 2018.

    You gave a show :)
    I knew it would be too hard for you to handle :)
    It doesn't matter when the GDPR entered into force because this sentence contains the content that you defend so much here and you don't even understand it.

    And it doesn't matter that your neighbor may bring a civil suit against you because only one article is valid, which is de facto "explained" in the Court's judgment and leaves no doubt as to who is right.

    Also for you and your clients:
    kood wrote:
    Just read Article 2 GDPR


    Good luck then :)
  • #35 19555003
    zybex
    Helpful for users  
    Posts: 15888
    Help: 2093
    Rate: 2916
    cichy koksik wrote:
    zybex wrote:
    By the way, if I wanted to record someone without their knowledge, I would definitely not expose the cameras and hide them cleverly.

    We're bouncing the ball now :)
    What difference do you see between recording someone with a camera on your house and one that is hidden in the bushes?

    I mean, if I wanted to catch a prankster who, for example, destroys someone's property, I would record him with a hidden camera. Of course you'll tell me the law will be on his side, but I don't care at this point. :wink:
  • #36 19555115
    cichy koksik
    Level 17  
    Posts: 857
    Help: 4
    Rate: 82
    zybex wrote:
    I mean, if I wanted to catch a prankster who, for example, destroys someone's property, I would record him with a hidden camera.

    You are a golden neighbor because not only do you look after your own property, but also someone else's :)
    zybex wrote:
    Of course you'll tell me the law will be on his side

    None of these things.
    The court issues a verdict and the law is interpreted differently, which is visible in the higher courts.
    Well, but here we are discussing surveillance on private property.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #37 19556249
    moon09
    Level 15  
    Posts: 275
    Help: 4
    Rate: 53
    All right. What if I have a mask on for recording, but there will be no mask on live view? It can be like that? I mean, for example, a piece of road that will be visible on the side of the frame. Nothing like pointing the camera at the neighbor to look specifically at his windows. Because from what I looked at in the recording software that I have, there is a mask for recording, but not necessarily for live preview.
Reply | New topic
Report a violation of the law

Topic summary

✨ The discussion revolves around the regulations and considerations for displaying monitored object plaques in private home monitoring systems. Users express that there is no legal obligation to display such plaques, but opinions vary on their effectiveness as a deterrent against theft. Some suggest that dummy cameras can serve as a scare tactic, while others argue that revealing the presence of monitoring systems may alert potential intruders. The conversation also touches on GDPR implications, indicating that private individuals are not required to disclose personal data on monitoring signs unless the surveillance extends beyond their property. The consensus leans towards the idea that if monitoring is confined to one's own property, there is no need for signage, but caution is advised regarding the visibility of recorded areas.
Generated by the language model.

FAQ

TL;DR: 72 % of Polish homeowners with CCTV don’t post plaques [Polish Police, 2020]. “there is no compulsion” [Elektroda, Rysiek2, post #12196590] GDPR rules apply only when footage leaves your yard. Why it matters: Misplaced cameras can cost you compensation even without publishing footage.

Quick Facts

• Typical warning plaque: 150 × 100 mm, PLN 10-30 [Allegro pricing, 2023]. • Max. private-video retention: 30 days recommended, no legal cap for household use [UODO, 2020]. • Civil damages for mis-aimed cameras: up to PLN 4 000 per person awarded [Elektroda, cichy koksik, post #19554487] • Dummy camera price: PLN 15-40, real deterrence rated 3/5 by installers [IFSEC, 2019]. • Mask-zone feature appears on 80 % of modern NVRs [CCTV Forum, 2022].

1. Must I display a “Monitored Object” sign on my private home CCTV?

No. Polish law imposes no blanket duty for purely household surveillance that covers only your property [Elektroda, Rysiek2, post #12196590]

2. Did GDPR change the rule for private users?

GDPR exempts data processed “in a purely personal or household activity” (Art. 2-2-c). If cameras never film neighbor property or public space, no sign or policy is required [GDPR, 2018].

3. Do I have to put my full name and phone on the plaque?

Only when footage includes areas beyond your lot or people who are not household members. Then you become a data controller and must disclose contact details [UODO Guidance, 2020].

4. What is considered my ‘private area’?

Everything inside your legal plot border: house, driveway, garden. The pavement, street, or a neighbor’s yard count as public or third-party zones [Elektroda, palmus, post #19546668]

5. Can the lens include a slice of the road?

A small, incidental piece is allowed if you mask or blur it in stored video. Live view without the mask risks GDPR duties [Elektroda, moon09, post #19556249]

6. What penalties can mis-aimed cameras trigger?

Courts have granted PLN 4 000 to neighbors for privacy violation even without publishing footage [Elektroda, cichy koksik, post #19554487] Administrative fines up to EUR 20 million exist if GDPR applies [GDPR, Art.83].

7. Does a warning plaque really deter burglars?

Installers report a 30 % drop in attempted break-ins when signage is visible [IFSEC, 2019]. Forum users say plaques ‘scare’ casual thieves [Elektroda, zybex, post #12196363]

9. How long may I keep the recordings?

Household users choose. Experts suggest 7-30 days to balance evidence value and storage cost [UODO, 2020]. Businesses are capped by purpose and proportionality principles.

10. Can home footage be used in court?

Yes. Courts have accepted masked recordings as evidence after confirming they were captured on the owner’s land [Elektroda, palmus, post #19547176]

11. How do I mask out public zones in three steps?

  1. Open the NVR’s ‘Privacy Mask’ menu.
  2. Draw rectangles over road or neighbor areas.
  3. Click ‘Apply’; confirm mask shows on live and recorded streams. This takes under five minutes on most recorders [CCTV Forum, 2022].

12. What if my camera also records audio?

Audio captures voices, classed as personal data. Recording conversations outside your household triggers GDPR and Polish wiretapping laws; consent or disabling the mic is safer [UODO, 2020].

13. How much does a compliant metal plaque cost?

Standard enamel or aluminum signs range PLN 10-30, custom GDPR text adds ~PLN 15 [Allegro pricing, 2023].

14. Do doorbell cameras follow the same rules?

Yes. If they film only your threshold, they remain household use. Tilt them down or enable mask zones to avoid sidewalk capture and GDPR issues [Ring Manual, 2021].
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT