logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Best WiFi to Ethernet Adapter for Connecting TV and Tuner Without Built-in WiFi

20067 19
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 12979947
    Anonymous
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 12979967
    matek451
    Level 43  
    The cheapest option is to buy a router with AP Client function. It will connect to your network via WiFi and you will connect the TV and decoder via LAN. Cost about PLN 70. I personally use the 8levelWRT-150 and it works fine. It has a Polish interface, you can easily configure it as an AP Client by of this manual http://digileaks.pl/1624-klient-ap-w-wrt-150/ The condition is that in the place where the AP Client is set up, the signal level of the router that makes up the network should be about -70dBm.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • #3 12985290
    mbo
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    Not a router, but the AP itself, e.g. EW-7209APg.
    The router will introduce some unwanted NAT in this case.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 12985341
    matek451
    Level 43  
    I wrote a router set to AP Client mode, not AP Client Router, and this is the main difference. In AP Client NAT mode on WRT-150 (WRT-300), it does not work. Compared to Edimax, it has n 150Mb / s (WRT150) or n 300Mb / s (WRT300) instead of g.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • #5 12985821
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    Hello, I am attaching to the topic. Namely, I'm flying on DI-524, I bought a TV to which I need to connect with the rj-45 cable. Just did not understand the last statement:

    matek451 wrote:
    In AP Client NAT mode on WRT-150 (WRT-300), it does not work. Compared to Edimax, it has n 150Mb / s (WRT150) or n 300Mb / s (WRT300) instead of g.


    In short - if I buy the "8level - wrt-150 smart" router, will I be able to "connect" to the wi-fi from dlink, and then with the cable to the TV?
    After the first answers I thought so, but because of the above-mentioned statement, I had doubts.

    Question no. 2 is this "wrt-150 smart" worth recommending / efficient enough, or is it better to add PLN 50 and buy something better? I would like to add that "wi-fi will have to cover" about 3-4m, including 2 brick walls (if it matters).
  • #6 12985871
    matek451
    Level 43  
    Personally, I use the WRT-150 as an AP Client. Connected tv and nc + decoder for multiroom and LG BD660. No problems for 1.5 years, also for streaming movies from the NAS connected to the main MR-3420v2 router. In my answer I indicated that in the client mode the router works as an AP and its DHCP is turned off. The devices are in one network formed by the main router. AP Client is transparent in the WiFi network. It's enough for DI-524, your D-Link only has g mode (54Mb / s) for WiFi. WRT-150 has n (150Mb / s).

    Added after 5 [minutes]:

    The condition for the correct operation of the AP Client is the signal level from the DI-524 in the WRT-150 set point at the level of about -70dBm. Can be measured inSSIDerem.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • #7 12986121
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    Great :)
    How do I measure with a laptop is the measurement reliable?
    Where would the WRT stand, I have a result of 60-70 dBm, and I understand that the less the better?
    By the way, and out of curiosity, I know that Di-524 only has "g" and unfortunately it cannot be used as AP at this point, but would it be possible to set WRT in such a way that it would receive in "g" mode and send via LAN and "n" mode? I know that it would not improve the "bandwidth" of d-link, but after 1 it would increase the range of wi-fi, and after 2 (I think) the speed of data transferred between computers (unless it is the data traveling from computer to computer via wi-fi and so they pass DI-524) but I would be more interested in a simple "extension" of the signal.
  • #8 12986164
    jimasek
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    It can also be TP-link WR743NDv2 - Link
  • #9 12986313
    matek451
    Level 43  
    In AP Client mode, the device only receives WiFi (its WAN becomes WiFi), it does not transmit WiFi. Further access via LAN only. If you want to send over WiFi, you connect a second radio, i.e. AP, to the client for LAN. This is the best solution based on two radio paths. There is one device with two AirLive G.DUO radios, cost about PLN 250, g mode. Extending the repeater type signal will lower the signal level from the DI-524 by a minimum of half. It is also not very stable and is not recommended for connecting a TV set, decoder (it receives and transmits via one radio).
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 12986327
    jimasek
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    matek451 wrote:
    In AP Client mode, the device only receives WiFi (its WAN becomes WiFi), it does not transmit WiFi.

    You are not entirely right here because the WR743ND has "Local Wireless" of course, it works on the same radio which affects the speed of the wireless network.
  • #11 12986383
    matek451
    Level 43  
    I agree with you, I know that, but this weak internal antenna does not knock down the range. Besides, this solution is based on one radio and with its DI-524, which has only g, it will limit its network speed to max. 8-10Mb / s. For some applications, it is definitely not enough, so I recommend solutions based on two radio channels. We both know it's a much better solution. If G.DUO is too expensive, it is worth buying an AP for AP Client and connecting to it via LAN for sowing on WiFi.
    Helpful post? Buy me a coffee.
  • #12 12986509
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    Ok, I know everything :)

    I would just like to make sure about this power, i.e. is the measurement with a laptop reliable, i.e. will everything be flickering when measuring between -60 to -70 dBm?
    As for TP-LINK, I can not find this version v2 on sale, and the first version is already PLN 20 more expensive than the 8level.
    I've already decided in general and today I'm going to the computer for the WRT-150 :) I do not want to spend more money, because it is to serve me only as a "wi-fi adapter for Samsung TV", and the prices of the original ones that work with this TV start from PLN 150-170, so a hundred (at least) in my pocket :)

    Thanks very much for your help and best regards :)
  • #14 13003254
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    However, I still have a problem ... I bought this WRT, I tried to configure it 10 times according to this page and after connecting to the TV or even on a laptop when I have wi-fi turned off, there is no internet access ...
    Best WiFi to Ethernet Adapter for Connecting TV and Tuner Without Built-in WiFi
    I don't know if it should do this either, but instead of assigning an ip in the 192.168.1.xxx range, it allocates some 169. (I don't remember any further), but I don't know if it should be like that or what. You can never see it on the link (but it probably should be), and when it accepts everything, it will save and restart WRT, then I can not enter it anymore and I have to reset it (in the back). I don't have the strength to do it anymore
  • #16 13003392
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    dlink di524 - the one I currently use wi-fi and which I want to connect to WRT
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #20 13007751
    icoverty
    Level 9  
    Somehow I got it and everything seems to be fine, I just have to enter everything on the TV manually.
    Only one thing puzzles me. Previously, dlink automatically assigned ip and played and roared, and now when it assigns, it gives me ip WRT as DNS (so no internet), after manually setting everything goes without any "but" :) however, I do not want to play with it anymore, set the ip manually, no problem, and on the "network" I even see the TV (when it is on), I have access to the settings of both router via wi-fi :) so it's OK :)

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the need for a WiFi to LAN adapter to connect a TV tuner and TV that lack WiFi capabilities. Users suggest using a router with AP Client functionality, such as the 8level WRT-150, which can connect to an existing WiFi network and provide internet access via LAN cables. Other options mentioned include the EW-7209APg and TP-Link WR743NDv2. Key considerations include ensuring a strong WiFi signal (around -70dBm) for optimal performance and avoiding NAT issues by configuring the router correctly. Users share experiences with setup challenges, including IP assignment issues and manual configuration for devices.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT