What is the reason for this? The fact that it is a value that changes when modifying electrical circuits and, unlike voltage, we can not explicitly define it? I make my considerations with direct current.
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamgoldi74 wrote:I understand that as the voltage on the battery is specified equal to 3V, while the current is not necessarily, this is because it can take different values?Current depends on the resistance of the circuit. The battery itself does not produce current only voltage. Current begins to flow only when the battery is loaded with a load.
goldi74 wrote:I will read. I will take this opportunity to ask one more question. When the nth receiver is connected to a series circuit, according to the rule, will the intensity of the source not change, while the voltage and intensity of the receivers will decrease in direct proportion?Read about Ohm's law.
goldi74 wrote:For the total circuit.Read about Ohm's law.
goldi74 wrote:On a side note, what a bunch of nonsense and lameness.
tomekm33 wrote:Of course, after all, it would be enough to give, for example, the average capacity on the cell. In most cases, such information is sufficient, and if someone wants to know the details, let him look for a datasheet.First - not everyone needs such detailed information (datasheet). After 2 - it would be better if (as you mentioned) at least indicative capacity in mAh was given. After 3 - you probably won't find information for every cell.
398216 Usunięty wrote:Of course, except that the identical situation is with batteries, and on batteries the capacity is given. In my opinion, this does not change anything, and even makes it more difficult - for example, to compare different cells, especially cells from different manufacturers.The trouble with this is that battery capacity is closely related to the current you draw from it. In my opinion, it is deliberate not to have this data available to "mere mortals", because they could misinterpret it and then it would be more trouble than it's worth.
398216 Usunięty wrote:With this I will not agree, this may have been the case in the past, but not today. Today anyway, most devices are powered by AA or AAA type cells. Even in multimeters where practically from time immemorial reigned 6F22 today already meet AAA precisely because of their incomparably higher capacity than 6F22. There used to be no readily available, cheap and good step-up converter circuits, and assembling a 9V from AAA cells would significantly increase the weight and size of the instrument. Today there is no problem with this, which is why this type of battery is slowly dying out.Otherwise - in 90% of cases, a given battery model is dedicated to a specific type of receiver - we are talking, of course, about "factory" designs - and for such a receiver it works properly.
Artur k. wrote:I think that in the case of car batteries this is necessary - after all, the car manufacturer equips its products with a specific type (capacity, starting current and even size, but that's another matter) of battery - precisely because of the energy requirements of a particular vehicle. As for batteries - the case is similar - if the manufacturer has decided that they are to be AA then you will not put AAA, because it will not contact. And vice versa - You won't put AA in the place provided for AAA because it won't go in. Comparing a bunch of batteries of a given type with each other, you can see quite significant differences in capacity from one type to another - so in some way this is also an indication of the "current appetite" of a given device.Identical situation is in the case of batteries
398216 Usunięty wrote:But rechargeable batteries are not only in cars. After all, there are rechargeable batteries in typical AA and AAA and other sizes. Here, too, the capacity is given, and it varies greatly.in the case of car batteries this is necessary - after all, the car manufacturer equips its products with a specific type (capacity, starting current and even size, but that's another matter) of battery - precisely because of the energy requirements of a particular vehicle. As for batteries - the case is similar - if the manufacturer has decided that they are to be AA then you will not put AAA, because it will not contact. And vice versa - You will not put AA in the place provided for AAA because it will not go in.
kortyleski wrote:And that's for sure, except that the possible stretching would be relatively easy to catch by a thinking person. It's exactly the same with rechargeable batteries - it's been known for a long time that in the case of, for example, AA-size NiMH, it's rather rare to find batteries with capacities greater than 2500mAh (typically around 2000-2300mAh, although I once had a Sanyo 2700mAh), if someone quotes a much higher capacity than everyone else then you can immediately sense that something is wrong.Even if the capacity was given on batteries, marketers would immediately come up with thousands of ways to measure so that the batteries of a particular manufacturer would be the best.
Artur k. wrote:the factual evidence ceases to exist.
CMS wrote:Eee, I think the real reasons are different. What would be wrong if manufacturers quoted the average capacity of a cell of a given type? I'm far from conspiracy theories, but from my observations it seems that some people could realistically lose out on this.this very fact, I believe, is the main reason why, on "batteries" we have only voltage.
CMS wrote:The Eneloops are about something else - Eneloops and all the new generation have a much smaller capacity than classic NiMH, for that they have a completely different property - much less spontaneous charge loss. That's what this is all about.Where did the Eneloops come from in the end.... And other "serious rechargeable batteries"
jarek_lnx wrote:And it depends what nearby store. Not long ago, there were Varta Industrials in a kiosk near me. Interestingly, they were not at all expensive - I think they were 2zl each for AA.An ordinary user who buys batteries at a nearby store is unlikely to get the "industrial" version
Zygmunt_mt wrote:Not exactly, the value of the short-circuit current, yes it indicates the internal resistance of the cell, but it does not indicate the amount of energy that such a cell can store.the size of the short-circuit current, indicates the internal resistance of the cell(battery). And it is one of the most important parameters, indicating the amount of stored energy.
jarek_lnx wrote:.I used to do tests and remember that batteries with the highest capacity do not have the lowest internal resistances.
trymer01 wrote:Makes sense, I have long checked the overall condition of cells in this way. Very often we are not able to check a cell by loading it with the nominal current at which it operates in the device, because we simply do not know the value. Measuring the voltage without a load also very often gives very little.Short-circuit current measurement is actually a current measurement with a load of 0.1 Ohm - that is, a current far greater than the current of normal operation, which calls into question the advisability of such a measurement, in addition, it is usually not healthy for the battery.
Zygmunt_mt wrote:Not exactly, the value of the short-circuit current yes indicates the internal resistance of the cell, but does not at all indicate the amount of energy that such a cell can store.the size of the short-circuit current, indicates the internal resistance of the cell(battery). And it is one of the most important parameters, indicating the amount of stored energy.