logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

SSD Disk Comparison: TLC vs MLC - Crucial MX300, Goodram Iridium, ADATA SU800 & SU900 (250GB)

jamelmar 22755 10
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 16327615
    jamelmar
    Level 9  
    Hello.
    I intend to buy a ssd disk about 250gb on a stationary system. I have read about different types of memory and everyone recommends the MLC standard, for example, 3D NAND TLC. It's about endurance, etc. I've tried to buy a Cruciala MX300, but it's just the TLC type compared to the MX200 or Goodrama iridium where MLC is. For example, ADATA Su800 on 3D Nand TLC is much cheaper than the Su900 where MLC is.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 16327638
    tomiok
    Level 33  
    I personally choose MLC, I prefer to pay extra.
    But you know (or at least you should know) what you expect from the durability of the data.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 16327929
    cxzcxz123
    Level 32  
    NAND TLC -> 3D NAND TLC -> NAND MLC -> 3D NAND MLC
    NAND TLC the worst - do not take it at all. 3D NAND MLC the best, SU900 is on them.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/10274/the-cruci...00-750gb-ssd-review-microns-3d-nand-arrives/4
    In addition to durability, among others therefore, not many people who know something about SSD recommend 3D NAND TLC. With the SU800, it's analogous - the performance drops strongly when full, and the SSD can be filled easily. Is this a big problem? Some think that yes, others do not. Eventually, SSD will be faster than HDD. But if the price difference between the MLC and 3D NAND TLC disc is small, then MLC is better. With MLC, there is no such problem. I bought GoodRam Iridium Pro and I'm happy.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 16328092
    r103
    Level 36  
    But it is so - that it is difficult to "kill" memory cells with average use. For example, I bought a 128 GB MLC disc, and then the disks on the TLC memory did not even occur any more - about a supposedly guaranteed number of 10,000 write cycles somewhere like 5 years ago - and I have saved it so far 50 times with such average use as a system disk , download folder, etc. I set on a disk. And the disk we already say morally aged is already a little small and let's say that nothing has worn out.

    And that's why manufacturers are well aware of such usage statistics - they now use generally cheaper / it comes to this cheaper / TLC memory about the planned number of cycles up to 1000 - but they know that it is unplayable and profits have more ...

    I completely omit the issue of disks on the SLC memory because it is a different segment of the market :-)
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #5 16328135
    Rafq25
    Level 16  
    r103 wrote:
    But it is so - that it is difficult to "kill" memory cells with average use. For example, I bought a 128GB MLC disc with a guaranteed number of write cycles 10,000 times somewhere like 5 years ago - and I have saved it so far 50 times with such average usage as a system disk, download folder, etc. I set on a disk. And the disk we already say morally aged is already a little small and let's say that nothing has worn out.

    And that's why manufacturers are well aware of such usage statistics - they now use generally cheaper / it comes to this cheaper / TLC memory about the planned number of cycles up to 1000 - but they know that it is unplayable and profits have more ...

    I completely omit the issue of disks on the SLC memory because it is a different segment of the market :-)


    How did you use it? How much disk percentage do you have? check it out :P

    I have Adate ASP900, semsunga evo 850 once kingston, I do not remember the model but on TLC, there is sql base there, after 2 years it has 96% life.
  • #7 16328173
    r103
    Level 36  
    The copy should not primarily be stored on 1 disk, regardless of its design :-)

    Added after 3 [minutes]:

    [Quote = "Rafq25"]
    r103 wrote:


    I have Adate ASP900, semsunga evo 850 once kingston, I do not remember the model but on TLC, there is sql base there, after 2 years it has 96% life.


    It's better to use SLC drives for such applications - do you associate what is it ???
  • #8 16328216
    tomiok
    Level 33  
    r103 wrote:
    The copy should not be stored on 1 disk first, ...

    Not only on one disk, but not only in one location. ;)
  • #9 16328240
    Rafq25
    Level 16  
    [quote = "r103"] A copy should not primarily be stored on 1 disk, regardless of its design :-)

    Added after 3 [minutes]:

    Rafq25 wrote:
    r103 wrote:


    I have Adate ASP900, semsunga evo 850 once kingston, I do not remember the model but on TLC, there is sql base there, after 2 years it has 96% life.


    It's better to use SLC drives for such applications - do you associate what is it ???


    It is a small database that I backup to another disk 2 times a day and once in a while in the cloud. SLC - too expensive for this application. I know what SLC is:)
  • #11 16328496
    korrus666
    Level 40  
    I bought GoodRam Iridium PRO some time ago and I'm happy. Previously, I had a Samsung 840 EVO 128GB. There was a lack of space, so I decided to invest in a larger one, and as SSD knows, the more free space, the longer it will live.

Topic summary

The discussion centers around the comparison of SSD types, specifically TLC (Triple-Level Cell) and MLC (Multi-Level Cell) NAND technologies, focusing on models such as Crucial MX300, Goodram Iridium Pro, ADATA SU800, and SU900. Users express a preference for MLC due to its superior endurance and performance, particularly in scenarios involving heavy usage. The consensus suggests that while TLC is cheaper and offers decent performance, it may not be as reliable for long-term data storage compared to MLC. Users share personal experiences, highlighting the longevity of MLC drives and the importance of maintaining backups across multiple disks. Recommendations lean towards the Goodram Iridium Pro for its MLC technology and warranty, while cautioning against TLC drives for critical data storage.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT