Seeking Car Models After 2000 with Maximum 8 Ltrs LPG Consumption under PLN 15,000

Hello colleagues, I need a car that will burn up to 8 liters of LPG.
I am interested in cars after 2000 up to PLN 15,000. If anyone knows of such car models, please share, please only verified information, greetings.

Modus 1.4, or another small Renault with this engine (K4J).

Honda Jazz smokes 7-8/100 with air conditioning.

Colleagues and something else besides these two cars? Clio is also eligible for 1.4 in Reno, but I would like to look for something else, I also listen to suggestions

Each with a displacement of less than 1.3 liters will burn less than 8, provided that it is with multi-point injection of gas in the liquid phase (5th generation). I have experience with Fiat Albea 1.2/16V from 2003. It burns on average 6.9l/100km of gas with such an installation.

My Corolla 1.4 - 2005 consumes 8 l/gas (combined cycle).

My yaris 1.0 smokes 8.3 to 8.5 in the city and on the road, depending on the leg, recently took 10 letters on WOT because I was in a hurry. When I drive gently, it's 7.x liters on the road. Everything depends on:
* Conditions in which the car moves, i.e. traffic jams, driver's leg,
*Engine condition, i.e. compression, oil, timing,
* Temperature and time of switching to gas,
*Correct adjustment with AFR.
*Tire condition and geometry including pressure....
* A million other factors, e.g. climate.....
If you want an economical car, buy it with a strong EGR or variable phases, every other kronkiel in the otta cycle will not have exorbitant economy. Well, unless a short gearbox for a larger engine really improves economy.

Grande Punto- Punto EVO 1.4 8v, fuel consumption in the sequence is about 7 liters of lpg/100 km.

ociz wrote:

Renault with this engine (K4J)

Me meganka 1.4 with this engine burns an average of 7.2 l / 100.

Hello friends, so I made a list of a few little ones, help me choose something sensible.

Toyota Yaris II , Suzuki Swift IV , Colt Z30 , Honda Jazz after 01' , Fiat Grande Punto , Opel Corsa D , Renault Modus , Skoda Fabia II , VW Polo IV.

How do the R3 and R4 1.4 MPI engines in the Fabia and Polo fare in terms of fuel consumption?

Yaris falls off with the engine 2 SZ and 1 NR the first valves after 10kkm end and the second oil devours .... 2 SZ I can do.

How is it with the installation of LPG in the Honda Jazz or Colt Z30?

Mitsu on the bank have problems with valves I don't know how colt and honda I don't know. Basically anything can be done, you just need to know how.

marek67a wrote:

How do the R3 and R4 1.4 MPI engines in the Fabia and Polo fare in terms of fuel consumption?

Leave R3 at the outset because it's a cesspool. 1.4 gives advice, only before winter it is good to clean the pneumothorax. I managed to go down to 5 petrol with a really calm ride, which is 6 gas with a good installation, with normal driving you have to count this 8.

sk700 wrote:

marek67a wrote:

How do the R3 and R4 1.4 MPI engines in the Fabia and Polo fare in terms of fuel consumption?

Leave R3 at the outset because it's a cesspool. 1.4 gives advice, only before winter it is good to clean the pneumothorax. I managed to go down to 5 petrol with a really calm ride, i.e. with a good gas installation, 6 gas, with normal driving you have to count this 8.

Renault with 1.4 or 1.2 engines. Fiat 1.2 8/16v can also be recommended. Installation and assembly is also important here

Volkswagen/seat with 1.6MPI engine. Well, of course, in terms of weight (ie Altea still catches, but there are probably heavier cars with this engine). It's a bit of a white raven, version 1.4 is more common. But I do not know how much it is worth attention (for gas, however, the engine must have some capacity).

Eidems wrote:

Renault with 1.4 or 1.2 engines. Fiat 1.2 8/16v can also be recommended. Installation and assembly is also important here

To be honest, the right selection of components and proper assembly is the most important thing. What you save on assembly is multiplied by 10 and put after it.
1.2 I would advise against it, shit true that a smaller engine will burn less and such a small capacity is not even suitable for rolling to church because you can be late for mass
The optimal engine for a small and light kennel will be a modern, high-performance 1.4.

If you want low fuel consumption, look for an engine with variable valve timing.

On a side note, that's what I figured.

IF it burns a liter more, it gives PLN 2,800 after 100,000 km (this is the gas price I assumed).
It's worth it or not worth fighting, it depends.

Colleagues tomorrow I will watch the Polo with 1.4 and Peugeot 207 1.4 90 KM how do Peugeot engines endure LPG?

My colleague from work bought a Golf 5 from 2005, the 1.4 MPI engine put in the BRC gas installation and has a fuel consumption of 7-8 l. I think you could easily look for something like this, he bought it for about 15,000. The car looks very nice.

1.4 MPI and such low fuel consumption? He will enjoy the engine soon.

I only drive "to church", half of it will pass on petrol from BRC.

Well, maybe he burns 7-8 liters on this brc gas installation, just ask how much more gasoline he will burn. In general, brc switches to gas for a long time, for example, stag on a warm engine burns immediately from gas.

I have 100KM jazz 1.4 and max. 8/100 with air conditioning and a shoe almost non-stop.

Mazda Demio B3 1.3, fourth generation from KME, route 7/100 city on climate 9/100. I do not know how the younger sister two will perform in this matter, but I bet that it will be similar, if not better, because the B3 engine remembers ancient times.

fiat punto 2 60km fuel consumption: orlen stations - 8-9 l/100, statoil - 6.5-7 l/100 fuel consumption practically on the road (90%). aveo 1.2 fuel consumption approx. 8-9l (in the city) statoil station

sk700 wrote:

Eidems wrote:

Renault with 1.4 or 1.2 engines. Fiat 1.2 8/16v can also be recommended. Installation and assembly is also important here

To be honest, the right selection of components and proper assembly is the most important thing. What you save on assembly is multiplied by 10 and put after it.
1.2 I would advise against it, shit true that a smaller engine will burn less and such a small capacity is not even suitable for rolling to church because you can be late for mass
The optimal engine for a small and light kennel will be a modern, high-performance 1.4.

See how little Renault 1.2 16v smokes. I have such an engine myself in a clio, and on petrol I often go below 6 liters (mixed mode), and in the city it is practically 7 liters max, so gas would be about 8-8.5 liters max. As for the punto 2, the 1.2 8v engine is cheaper to service, but it consumed a liter more, and I could never go below 6 liters with fuel consumption. When I was driving a panda 1.1 mpi, it was on a poor installation (some eco gas), the car burned about 8 liters of gas. The lowest fuel consumption I know is a Yaris with a 1.33 engine, the car is in the family, and it consumed less than 5 liters on the route. I would avoid engines from the VAGA group 1.2-1.4, 1.6 8v is an old design but also fuel-consuming, so 10-11l of gas must be counted (with 2.0 similarly).

Eidems wrote:

The lowest fuel consumption I know is a Yaris with a 1.33 engine

Yeah, you'll only exceed 120 km/h on the road and immediately the fuel consumption increases from 5 to 8 liters of petrol. Maybe it's economical but for grandparents.

ociz wrote:

Eidems wrote:

The lowest fuel consumption I know is a Yaris with a 1.33 engine

Yeah, you'll only exceed 120km/h on the road and immediately the fuel consumption increases from 5 to 8l of petrol. Maybe it's economical but for grandparents.

Ok, you can always put on gas.