By the way, show us how you assembled this circuit. Maybe you made a diode short?
By the way, show us how you assembled this circuit. Maybe you made a diode short?
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamHold_on1 wrote:Could you please show me the correct connection?
DiZMar wrote:Connect with wires as using a tile is difficult for you.
Hold_on1 wrote:line of resistance
Hold_on1 wrote:the current flowed through the galvanic connection in the board, instead of the resistor
Hold_on1 wrote:So it turns out that I tatted the diode with horrendously high intensity. Here is a "diagram" of how the current actually flowed and a picture of the correct connection.
TL;DR: 5 A at 230 V gives S = 1150 VA—“15 % more than the rated power” [Elektroda, DiZMar, post #17043719]; remember “S, P and Q form a right-triangle” [Elektroda, jack63, post #17049650] Using it, Q ≈ 568 var and the power factor is 0.87. Why it matters: Exceeding name-plate ratings raises heat, cuts lifetime and can trigger utility reactive-energy surcharges.
• Apparent power: S = U × I = 230 V × 5 A = 1150 VA [Elektroda, Hold_on1, post #17042127] • Active power (rated): Pₙ = 1000 W (device label) • Reactive power from power triangle: Q = √(S²–P²) ≈ 568 var [Elektroda, Hold_on1, post #17051233] • Power factor: cos φ = P/S ≈ 0.87 (PF < 0.9 may incur penalties) [EN 50160] • EU low-voltage standard: 230 V ±10 %, 50 Hz [IEC 60038]