Is it possible to distribute the LAN from the router through the hub in the home

Hello,
in a single-family house I have an installation on a coaxial cable which is distributed to the rooms from the attic.
I would like to put a router in the attic and give up WiFi connectivity in favor of Lan via a cable.
I do not really want to put a twisted pair, because the house is almost new and after painting, but this, apart from drilling, would involve a bit more interference in the plaster.
I would like to use the existing network on a coaxial cable.
The router I have is Asus to the operator's card. Are there any adapters, or would it require the purchase of a new router?
I will be grateful for your help.

PawelKce wrote:

Hello,
I would like to use the existing network on a coaxial cable.

First, you would have to lay the 50om coaxial cable, not the one for the TV-75.
Secondly, in today's technology, it cannot be done cheaply.

There are even devices (switches), e.g. NF-1804M, which work in BNC technology and can work in a star (like a twisted pair), up to 92Mbs. They are used for downstream wired transmissions where it is too far over the twisted pair.
For the purposes of the Internet, it would also work, but is it worth it? You would connect this to your router and it would send the signal through the BNC plugs.
However, this switch does not cost little, and on the other hand, you also need converters to RJ-45 twisted pair (because BNC network cards are probably only for ISA, PCI and PCIMCIA for older computers).

Here are the links to an example device:
http://www.nufiber-systems.com/sale-7730762-4...t-over-coaxial-converter-2km-master-type.html

http://www.nufiber-systems.com/supplier-112566-ethernet-over-coaxial-converter

Hello

The technology "died out" more than 20 years ago, it is not used often, so unfortunately it is expensive. There is a fairly efficient alternative to this type of connection. Look on Google under the name "Outlet Internet". These are LAN adapters running on the electric network, without forging and mounting wires to the network.

greetings

What the devil is tempting you, give up time, once upon a time in the early days of network connections it was common and generally did not work with a few exceptions. Now, you will not buy this equipment on BNC, even in a bazaar antique shop, unless some strange converters and if it even worked, max transmission up to 10Mbit

I used to test some RJ45 converters - TV cable.
The 10 Mb / s version even worked, the 100 Mb / s version did not really want to work.
But I don't remember what it was called or who made it.

Currently something like this:
http://televesdystrybutor.pl/nadkuje-odbiorni...1gbps-hdvt-1zlacza-ethernet-i-2-zlacza-f.html

What I tested was passive (without power).

You can search for "ethernet coaxi adapter".
Unfortunately, it's not cheap ...

mbo wrote:

I used to test some RJ45 converters - TV cable.
The 10 Mb / s version even worked, the 100 Mb / s version did not really want to work.
But I don't remember what it was called or who made it.

These are called MOca converters.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIKIMk6s5Yw

Radiosonic ICY BOX IB-CX110-110-Kit, tested, works on 100 MB, uses a 75 Ohm cable (this is the specification and I used it) and does not require tees and terminators that were needed for the BNC connection. In the specification, the maximum distance is 200 meters, in my case it was about 25 meters.

PawelKce wrote:

I do not really want to put a twisted pair, because the house is almost new and after painting, but this, apart from drilling, would involve a bit more interference in the plaster.

I will leave without a comment ... During construction / major renovation, it is even a duty to lay the twisted pair ... Now you can save yourself with PLC adapters but the costs are much higher than the twisted pair, especially if the transfers are to be made of twisted pair.

Gentlemen
Each of us presented different views on the concentration, the author of the thread already has a view as such, but somehow he does not express himself.
It seems to me that, after all, BNC made in a modern and professional manner is a very high cost if there are a lot of rooms (points). It will be easier to apply the solution proposed above, i.e. LAN via network sockets - there are adapters on the market after all.

Or maybe it can be done quite simply with minor modifications - that is, use the skirting boards and pass under the skirting boards under the door. Maybe the ceiling is suspended, or the walls are made of gypsum boards - it sounds a bit unprofessional, but it gives a lot of room for maneuver and reduces the breaking of fresh walls.

A few posts have accumulated, let the author comment.

Maybe wi-fi after all?

Thank you for all your comments.
Now I am sure that it will be best to abandon this solution with a concentrate.
However, I will go with a twisted pair, a wooden ceiling with plasterboard, so it will go somehow.
A 2-year-old house and I agree that such wiring is laid immediately during construction, so why not put it?
Only recently did I realize what is happening now, everywhere Wifi, bluetooh etc. In a word, we served ourselves a global microwave. Probably not everyone will agree with me or say that I am exaggerating, but I have two small children and I prefer to play with the cable by the laptop.

greetings

Added after 12 [minutes]:

I will also consider PowerLine. Also not a stupid solution.

PawelKce wrote:

I will also consider PowerLine. Also not a stupid solution.

Only this can not be covered with one set (2 pieces in the set), and with more users using one point at the router, the network performance will be headlong.

PawelKce wrote:

Probably not everyone will agree with me or say that I am exaggerating, but I have two small children and I prefer to play with the cable by the laptop.

| As you say "microwave" is global. Your WiFi on or off, unfortunately, will not make a big difference. A neighbor will turn on a Chinese USB card bought on the Allegro that exceeds the power standards 10 or 20 times and all your actions are about the edge of your butt You would have to build a faraday cage instead of a house. Search for the list of radio links in PL and open in google earth. You'll turn gray. In addition, you have GPS, TV, satellite TV, cell phones (often by your ear !!), all wireless cameras, remote controls, weather radars. and what is not there yet.
In short. As long as you do not sleep with your head on the WiFi router with overclocked power, you should not worry about it. That's my opinion.

And switching to a cable has one major advantage. No WiFi will give you the speed and stability of a cable. You connect everything you can with cables. WiFi is how the device must move.

I agree with you, WiFi, masts, transmitters are everywhere and it cannot be avoided anymore and digitization is progressing more and more. On the other hand, if you can cut something off within your reach, it's always something. If I lived in a block of flats, I would have several Wifi networks available from my neighbors. At home, after turning off Wifi, the neighbors have no influence anymore.

PawelKce wrote:

If I lived in a block of flats, I would have several Wifi networks available from my neighbors

That's an understatement? Rather a few dozen minimum.