Tesla Saver ECO. Does it really work and saves electricity up to 50%?

I have been trying to buy a Tesla Saver ECO for some time now. Or its replacement, which was sold on Allegro.
Some man shows a movie in which he has 3 fluorescent lamps from office lamps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIcyI-juzQw&feature=youtu.be

What do you say?
To take. Is it just a scam.
For me, the most electricity consumes are: Refrigerator, freezer (2 units), boiler, vacuum cleaner, mixer, chainsaw, computer, TV set with tuner. LED bulbs have been around for some time.

Do I really have to buy the original. Because I know perfectly well that it is not.
In the center of the device is a block capacitor with a very large capacity.
Advise me. I will be grateful.
Where is the cheapest to buy. On Alibaba.com there is no ...

Do not buy, rent, take off the diagram and take measurements.
Maybe it will finally be possible to overthrow Ohm's Law?

Personally, I am wondering whether I should buy four to start with and sell electricity.

Buy a minimum of 4, the power plant will pay you back.

And seriously - FRAUD, big earnings for the originator.

This is a typical deer magnet. Here you will find a similar device with a schematic.
This is a way to sell a device worth PLN 2 much more expensive.

wojtek2004 wrote:

For me, the most electricity consumes are: Refrigerator, freezer (2 units), boiler, vacuum cleaner, mixer, chainsaw, computer, TV set with tuner.

Better invest that money in newer, more energy-efficient equipment. I personally have a TV CRT 14 ", which consumes as much electricity as my newer TV 42 inches. Sometimes it is worth investing in newer equipment and connect the boiler during the heating season to the boiler room if you live at home. co-financing for them.

wojtek2004 wrote:

Advise me. I will be grateful.

Know yourself and find your way ninja.
And don't believe everything you see on the Internet. - Here you go, and you don't have to thank.

There are fifty topics on the forum about these devices.
One big nonsense - this is a shortcut of all of them.

Madrik wrote:

There are fifty topics on the forum about these devices.
One big nonsense - this is a shortcut of all of them.

Probably a hundred would accumulate on the Electrode itself. In the rest of the Internet - infinity, because there is more and more rubbish, only under different names - now they brazenly use the name Tesla, after all, fashionable lately.

wojtek2004 wrote:

For me, it consumes the most electricity ...

Well ... not current, buddy ... only energy ... active, but also reactive (inductive or capacitive).
Haven't you noticed that these crooks always use an ammeter for "testing", that is, they measure the current (amperage) - it works on the imagination, doesn't it?
Now take a look at the counter and the invoice. What the meter counts and what do you pay for? For what physical quantity and what is its unit?
Aren't you surprised that no smart guy dares use a wattmeter? He knows perfectly well that his readings will not change, and neither will the counting of the meter.
He also knows exactly that the changes in amperes are due to the reactive power / energy for which individual recipients do not pay - so it has no effect on the settlement with the supplier, so there are also no savings - but there is profit from selling a worthless box ...
And that is the essence of the deception you fall for.

on aliexpress, this pseudo saver costs $ 3.44 + $ 0.39 shipping, which is in line with the value of this device. (it is about the components -1 capacitor, 2 LEDs and two resistors and 1 fuse + nice housing.but unfortunately it saves energy, or will also reduce the bill, it is not worth counting

The topic is back on the net again, probably new imaginative hustlers

In the April issue Understanding Electronics was discussed in depth (six pages) about this kind of pseudo electricity savers.

Citizen75 wrote:

In the April issue Understanding Electronics was discussed in depth (six pages) about this kind of pseudo electricity savers.

But simple discussions for simple (specifically unfamiliar with the subject) people should also be promoted, on channels through which scammers reach, and not only in industry literature.

tipo906969 wrote:

The topic is back on the net again, probably new imaginative hustlers

There will always be thieves based on... whatever. If there is an opportunity to push someone a whajster from a bulbulator, there will be those who will produce it, advertise it and praise what it is not. And so in every industry and there are no people who would know everything. Although non-technical people are actually more at risk here.