logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

PEN Division, 4-Pole Surge Arrester Use in TNC-S Network: Is Image & Connection Correct?

semper fidelis1 39465 12
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
  • #1 17934976
    semper fidelis1
    Level 6  
    Hello

    I have a question about the PEN division and the use of a 4-pole surge arrester in the TNC-S network.

    Is what the picture shows okay? I mean the PEN division at the input to the switchgear, then the PE to the PE bus which will be earthed to the hoop also located in the switchgear and connected to the earthing of the surge arrester.

    The overvoltage limiter is 4-way, although I do not know if it makes sense to protect N which is galvanically connected with PEN and PE, I just have it?

    TNC network with S division in my switchboard. Cable connection 4x 10mm2.
    PEN Division, 4-Pole Surge Arrester Use in TNC-S Network: Is Image & Connection Correct?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 17935094
    mawerix123
    Level 39  
    What is this protector :?: how did you pick it up :?:
    It's yellow-green in the lower right corner of where it will be mounted :?:
    What is this object and what does its power supply look like apart from this 4x10 cable :?:
  • #3 17935432
    semper fidelis1
    Level 6  
    The PE rail is also originally installed in the switchgear at the bottom (I have Legrand).

    It will be a single-family house. It is the main separation, then there will be 5 pcs.

    Counter protection C25.

    The ABB B + C protector was recommended to me in an electrical store and there was nothing else on the project except that there should be a B and C protector.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 17935452
    mawerix123
    Level 39  
    You have not written how the house is powered, overhead or cable, and how long the 4x10 section is.
    The house has a lightning protection system :?:

    semper fidelis1 wrote:
    The ABB B + C protector was recommended to me in an electrical store


    Because it had been lying on the shelf for too long :D they should recommend a TN-C protector but they probably didn't have one ;)
  • #5 17935462
    semper fidelis1
    Level 6  
    That's right, they didn't have 3 poles, but what's the difference? I can't connect anything to N?

    Not exactly like the picture below.

    My power supply is earth, some 25m connection, then it is connected to the overhead line.

    There will be no lightning protection - at least for now and you will brighten me up, what will it change? The earthing hoop is connected to the earth ring around the house with the 4x32 hoop.

    PEN Division, 4-Pole Surge Arrester Use in TNC-S Network: Is Image & Connection Correct?
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 17935480
    mawerix123
    Level 39  
    In my opinion, you should have an arrestor based on a magneto.

    In my opinion, this limiter is not suitable for home limp 7kA, laughs are the worst, they have about 20kA, although these are stretched values because at 8/20 where the 7kA is 10/350 and it seems it is a T1 (B) type protector and not B + C.

    With the amount you invested in ABB, you would probably buy the right one.
  • #7 17935532
    semper fidelis1
    Level 6  
    No, you have T1 + T2 written on it, I invested less than PLN 500 in it, I do not know what would be the right one, the electrician wanted to give me some Chinese for PLN 250, I thought I would buy a better one, I did not analyze it like you because I honestly don't know much about protectors. One more thing in the project is that the ZE provides type I protection.
    Regardless of it, is the connection method correct? Should this N finally be connected to the protector or just leave it empty? If it was not, the protector is already for the division, I know there should also be N connected.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #9 17935701
    semper fidelis1
    Level 6  
    Very nice article and well-written that the knowledge about when and what to use by electricians is very general, to put it mildly, most of them choose the cheap one, the customer is satisfied, the cash register agrees. I wouldn't see any further what kind of protector to use and I won't insist, but I'm not saying mine is bad anyway. However, this was not what I wanted to ask if the model is good, I could draw a square and sign it because I only mean the connections - I also had the opinion that the PE should be first to the protector and then to the PE rails, for example, but I don't know if it's the best idea.

    If someone thinks that my protector is bad, I spent money unnecessarily, I will be happy to hear what it should be - you can always replace it.
  • Helpful post
    #10 17935714
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    Each protector is supplied with the manufacturer's instructions. So you should first check if what you bought is intended for the type of network you have, and if so, the required connection method is shown in the drawings.
  • #11 17936144
    CYRUS2
    Level 43  
    semper fidelis1 wrote:
    My power supply is earth, some 25m connection, then it is connected to the overhead line.
    If there is a break in the PEN in the overhead network, the receivers will also be damaged.
    The protectors will not work for this.
    semper fidelis1 wrote:
    Counter protection C25.
    Better power limiter, w or D25.
    D25 is an opportunity for short circuit selectivity
  • #12 17936156
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl
    CYRUS2 wrote:
    semper fidelis1 wrote:
    Counter protection C25.
    Better power limiter, w or D25.
    D25 is an opportunity for short circuit selectivity

    But it is not the author who specifies the type of security. It does in terms of attachment.
  • #13 17936252
    CYRUS2
    Level 43  
    retrofood wrote:
    But it is not the author who specifies the type of security. It does in terms of attachment.
    The amperage is the same.
    Power limits the same.

Topic summary

The discussion revolves around the use of a 4-pole surge arrester in a TNC-S network and the correct implementation of PEN division at the switchgear input. The user seeks clarification on the appropriateness of their setup, which includes connecting the PE to the PE bus and the earthing of the surge arrester. Various responses highlight concerns about the type of surge protector used, with suggestions for a more suitable model based on its specifications. The importance of following manufacturer instructions for installation and ensuring compatibility with the network type is emphasized. Additionally, the potential risks associated with PEN breaks in overhead networks are noted, along with the necessity of proper earthing and lightning protection considerations.
Summary generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT