Hello. What do you think about RYOBI, the question is for people who have used the company's tools for at least two years. The main ones interest me: -RYOBI RID1801M 18V 220NM Impact Wrench Screwdriver -RYOBI R18DD3-0 18V 50NM drill driver -RYOBI RRS1801M CORDLESS SAW 18V Is this a Chinese crap, like with batteries, apparently the problem is with the service?
On the basis of a cordless drill with a stroke (about PLN 600), I can say that Ryobi is not bad! I would put these tools on at least a medium shelf. Ryobi definitely beats market products (Lidl and Biedron) and in my opinion they are better than the green Bosch. If we have to compare, they are also much cheaper than the "blue" Bosch, Milwuakee or AEG. IMHO, the value for money is in favor of Ryobi. However, you need to be aware that when you buy Ryobi, you are actually entering the system of these tools.
The advantage of Ryobi over others is definitely the single battery system for many tools. Of course, others have it, but there are special grommets available for Ryobi, which allow you to use batteries of other brands without any problems. So, for example, from Makita.
It is useful when, after a power tool failure, we have efficient and unused batteries. The system of adapters works only one way, so the "foreign" ones can be included in Ryobi. There are also adapters in the network that allow you to power them directly from the 230V mains, but I did not use them myself.
they are also much cheaper than the "blue" Bosch, Milwuakee or AEG. IMHO, the value for money is in favor of Ryobi.
You must be kidding yourself. It is actually Chinese, aspiring to be called "a little better brand".
Mobali wrote:
It is useful when, after a power tool failure, we have efficient and unused batteries.
I have not met a power tool that wears out faster than the battery for it. Apart from the exceptions (the issue of replacing brushes). To make it funnier, Mr. Mobali, Milwaukee, AEG and Ryobi are the same group - TTI, the names are just brands. Quality just in the order I listed them.
Ryobi definitely beats market products (Lidl and Biedron
My opinion is similar. But it also goes hand in hand with the price. Because it is not surprising that almost 100% more expensive equipment is of better quality.
Redundant I have removed from this is PW or reporting. [TM]
I wonder how my entries were deleted? The "cutouts" are of course selective, because the aggressive robokop post still hangs on the Forum. As you can see, some are allowed much more here, and the rules are for others only.
Jawi_P wrote:
Don't be a hypocrite, it's very messy that you use such arguments and turn on / off self-restraint on request.
Exactly! Some may be entitled to double standards here.
Moderated By Topolski Mirosław:
In case of doubts, there is PW or reporting. 3.1.11. Don't post messages that add nothing to the discussion. They are misleading, dangerous or do not solve the user's problem. 3.1.9. Do not be ironic and do not be malicious with the other side of the discussion. Respect the dissenting opinion and other opinions in the forum.
My opinion is similar. But it also goes hand in hand with the price. Because it is not surprising that almost 100% more expensive equipment is of better quality.
How can you put typical market equipment in line with a completely different shelf, price and quality?
Jawi_P wrote:
Don't be a hypocrite, it's very messy that you use such arguments and turn on / off self-restraint on request.
What, you can no longer point out to someone that he writes stupidity? I paste it again: https://www.muratorplus.pl/biznes/firmy-i-lud...onic-industries-poland-aa-yMZJ-Spsx-JTyM.html All brands mentioned by the Mobali user (AEG, Milwaukee, Ryobi) is the same TTI group - equipment with different "target" - Milwaukee profi, AEG less profi, Ryobi-hobby, amateur use. You have to hold all 3 in your hand to be able to substantively express yourself, taking into account other criteria than the color of the casing matching the makeup / jacket. Quality / price ratio? Jokes. The price difference comes from somewhere - for example, from the durability of the machine itself or the availability of the service. There is no point in taking MacAlister, Parkside or Dedra as a comparison - because they are all disposable. Batteries for portable devices are a completely different story - none of the manufacturers probably produces them (in the sense of cells for them). Garbage can be found anywhere - and the subsequent purchase of a new battery often exceeds 3/4 of the price of the machine.
I will not bring anything to the topic at all, nor do I use these tools professionally, nor have I compared to other brands. I already have about 10-15 Ryobi battery tools (saws, grinders, mowers, etc.), I am extremely pleased. Some of them do not go crazy due to the limitations of battery power, but some, such as a drill / driver or a hammer drill, are very successful in my opinion. I have a few original batteries and a few non-original ones, 2-3x cheaper.
Gentlemen, did anybody use third-party battery adapters for Ryobi tools? For example, you can buy an adapter from Parkside to Ryobi, I'm curious how it works and there are no long-term side effects. Aku Ryobi 5Ah about PLN 350-400, Parkside aku 4Ah in the ferry 90 PLN ...
The discussion revolves around the long-term reliability of RYOBI tools, specifically the RID1801M impact wrench, R18DD3-0 drill driver, and RRS1801M cordless saw. Users express mixed opinions based on their experiences. Some users commend RYOBI for offering good value for money, highlighting the benefits of a single battery system compatible with multiple tools and the ability to use third-party batteries. Others criticize the brand, labeling it as inferior and equating it to lower-quality supermarket tools, citing issues with battery longevity and overall durability. The consensus suggests that while RYOBI tools are not professional-grade, they are suitable for amateur use and outperform cheaper brands. Summary generated by the language model.
