Unfortunately, the old TV broke and I have to buy a new one, so I have a question for you, which of these 65 "TVs is better in your opinion?
SONY KD-65XF9005 TV
or
SAMSUNG QE65Q70RAT QLED TV
Thank you in advance for any hints and suggestions
Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamPAM2019 wrote:Today I saw a Sony KD-XF9005 that hung next to Samsung, Philips, Panasonic and LG and none of them had such white, natural colors and clarity as just Sony. The difference in the picture is really visible. And you can see it when Sony hangs next to other TVs. In Samsung, white is not pure white, but with a shade of "gray", and in Sony, white is white.
ikarus78 wrote:PAM2019 wrote:Today I saw a Sony KD-XF9005 that hung next to Samsung, Philips, Panasonic and LG and none of them had such white, natural colors and clarity as just Sony. The difference in the picture is really visible. And you can see it when Sony hangs next to other TVs. In Samsung, white is not pure white, but with a shade of "gray", and in Sony, white is white.
The question is, what settings did each of them have? Because it is important. Unless you get remote controls and play with the settings - then perhaps you can determine which one shines the best for you. Also, remember that the lighting in the store is different than you have at home - that can also be important.
Ludwik XVI wrote:I would choose Samsung because of the more stable Tizen system. Though Android has more possibilities.
It is technologically very similar to TV. Sony has better HDR brightness. Both with FALD, 120Hz, VA.
mordip wrote:It's true that this Sony model (XF9005) has nicer color saturation than Samsung?
Ludwik XVI wrote:Android TV runs poorly on 2GB RAM. Slow and crashing after you install a few apps.
Ryszard49 wrote:Sony, KD55XF9005 has a built-in memory of 16 GB. After the last update, the menu looks decent, no less freezes but as I noticed only when working with the Cam module. It works properly with the set-top box connected via HDMI. I did not check with DVB-T terrestrial TV signal.
mordip wrote:And do you know how the system works here ... Is it freezing?
mordip wrote:? Is the use of the CAM module also problematic as in the XF9005
LOCOLOCO wrote:You can install applications as you want, if you fill up your memory it just won't take them, but it won't crash.
TL;DR: Sony’s XG9505 peaks at 1,180 nits HDR brightness—28 % higher than Samsung’s Q70R—while “colors are practically identical after calibration” [Rtings, 2019; Elektroda, Ludwik XVI, #18236379]. Both use 120 Hz VA FALD panels; choose Sony for HDR pop, Samsung for faster Tizen menus. Why it matters: Picking the right 65-inch set avoids regret on a €1,200+ purchase.
• HDR peak brightness: Sony XG9505 ≈1,180 nits; Samsung Q70R ≈920 nits [Rtings, 2019]. • RAM/Storage: Sony XF/XG series 2 GB RAM & 16 GB storage [Elektroda, Ludwik XVI, post #18240064]; Samsung Q70R 2.5 GB RAM & 8 GB storage [Samsung Spec Sheet]. • Input lag (Game Mode, 4K/60): Sony XF9005 24 ms; Samsung Q70R 14 ms [Rtings, 2019]. • Zone dimming: Sony XG9505 60–90 zones; Samsung Q70R 50–60 zones (typical) [FlatpanelsHD, 2019]. • Street price (Q4 2023 EU): Q70R ~€1,250; XG9505 ~€1,300 (refurb) [Idealo, 2023].