KOCUREK1970 wrote: Only a local AP connected by a cable to the main router makes sense.
I always put an AP connected with a wire to the router, regardless of whether it would be mesh or not.
IC_Current wrote: I recommend, however, to look at the support of fast roaming protocols and not to put completely independent APs.
What hardware platform can you recommend - a mid-range one?
Erbit wrote: A colleague of the author will check what mesh is (even in Wikipedia) to know if it is what he expects (in my opinion, not). A friend is probably looking for several APs that will cover an area with a common range. I'm wrong?
A colleague has read, but there are few specific opinions about "mesh" in Mikrotik. There are several conflicting ones.
Of course, I care about good coverage of the area and switching between points in the same ssid network.
Erbit wrote: . However, you also need to know that for roaming to work, the client must also support roaming, and this can be different.
Yes, I know that the client makes the decision to switch.
Erbit wrote: For the average "internet eater" Mikrotik is more difficult to configure than, for example, Ubiquiti and it is probably better to go in the direction of this brand, the more that Ubiquiti is roaming.
I use Mikrotik (router + AP) at home. I'm familiar with linux so it's easier. I am asking about mesh on Mikrotik before I buy an additional device for testing - if it is to lie later, I prefer to consult it first.
Erbit wrote: On Mikrotik, client switching between APs works well, but it is not roaming.
Does this switching work well within one ssid?