logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Is it possible to design a circuit to remotely trigger a pokies machine payout?

123 15
ADVERTISEMENT
  • #1 21663012
    vince
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21663013
    Chuck Sydlo
    Anonymous  
  • #3 21663014
    David Adams
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #4 21663015
    vince
    Anonymous  
  • #5 21663016
    Peter Owens
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #6 21663017
    vince
    Anonymous  
  • #7 21663018
    Joe Wolin
    Anonymous  
  • #8 21663019
    vince
    Anonymous  
  • #9 21663020
    Jeff Evemy
    Anonymous  
  • #10 21663021
    Chuck Sydlo
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #11 21663022
    Jake Watts
    Anonymous  
  • #12 21663023
    Sarah Harris
    Anonymous  
  • #13 21663024
    Joe Wolin
    Anonymous  
  • #14 21663025
    Joe Wolin
    Anonymous  
  • #15 21663026
    vince
    Anonymous  
  • #16 21663027
    vince
    Anonymous  

Topic summary

✨ The discussion addresses the feasibility of designing a remote circuit to trigger a payout on a pokies machine (Australian term for slot or fruit machines). Consensus indicates that such machines are deliberately designed to prevent wireless hacking or unauthorized remote control due to security and legal concerns. Achieving remote payout would require unrestricted access to the machine's internal hardware and software, which is highly unlikely and illegal. Historical anecdotal methods involved physical manipulation of coin slots to generate free credits but did not cause payouts. Comparisons were made to other secure electronic systems like ATMs, emphasizing the complexity and ethical issues involved. Alternative related topics included the concept of EMP devices to disable vehicle electronics during police chases, highlighting the technical challenges and limited effective range of such devices. Overall, the technical and legal barriers make remote triggering of pokies payouts impractical and inadvisable.
Generated by the language model.

FAQ

TL;DR: Trying to make a pokie/slot machine pay out remotely is unethical and illegal; EMP field tests show only 4–6 ft range, and “basically fries the components,” not precise control. [Elektroda, Chuck Sydlo, post #21663021]

Why it matters: Engineers and hobbyists often ask “can we?”—this FAQ explains why you shouldn’t, and where legitimate security research belongs, in clear, practical terms for learners and professionals.

Quick Facts

What is a “pokies” machine?

In Australian usage, “pokies” means fruit machines or slot machines. They accept bets and pay out per regulated odds. [Elektroda, vince, post #21663015]

Can you design a circuit to remotely trigger a slot machine payout?

Engineers in the thread say it’s highly doubtful and likely criminal. Manufacturers design against wireless exploits. Expect legal consequences. [Elektroda, Chuck Sydlo, post #21663013]

Did any old tricks ever work on vintage machines?

One anecdote describes using a gas‑stove piezo ignitor and wire to add credits in the late 1970s. Modern machines block such exploits. [Elektroda, Sarah Harris, post #21663023]

Would an EMP stop a fleeing car cleanly and safely?

Tests show EMP devices need close proximity, about 4–6 feet, and tend to fry components rather than disable gracefully. [Elektroda, Chuck Sydlo, post #21663021]

Why don’t police widely use EMP stoppers on the road?

Getting an EMP close enough to the vehicle’s ECU is hard. Range limits and reliability issues block practical deployment. [Elektroda, Chuck Sydlo, post #21663021]

What would it take to influence a commercial machine’s behavior?

You’d need detailed design knowledge and precise field injection. “The right signal in the right place” often causes failure instead. [Elektroda, Jeff Evemy, post #21663020]

Is asking how to hack payouts appropriate on engineering forums?

Moderators call such questions ethically suspect and discourage them. Direct manufacturer contact is suggested for responsible inquiry. [Elektroda, Peter Owens, post #21663016]

Could this topic fit a legitimate university or security‑consulting project?

Yes, framed as defensive research with clear ethics and scope. Provide context and purpose when seeking guidance. [Elektroda, Joe Wolin, post #21663018]

So what conclusion did the original asker reach?

They acknowledged the argument was lost: it can’t be done, or is too hard to be practical. [Elektroda, vince, post #21663027]

Do manufacturers ever include remote payout mechanisms?

Participants argue there’s zero incentive to ship such vulnerabilities. Cash handling uses secure, physical processes. [Elektroda, Jake Watts, post #21663022]

Is trying to override ATMs or slots likely to land me in legal trouble?

Yes. Engineers explicitly warn of jail‑time risks for attempting such exploits. Don’t pursue it. [Elektroda, Chuck Sydlo, post #21663013]

Could a targeted RF signal make a slot machine pay out without damage?

Even with access, unintended effects dominate. Field injection more often crashes or damages systems than yields controlled payouts. [Elektroda, Jeff Evemy, post #21663020]

How should I ask security questions responsibly?

State your ethical intent, avoid exploit details, and engage manufacturers or IRBs. Keep community guidelines in mind. [Elektroda, Peter Owens, post #21663016]

How‑To: frame a defensible security research question (3 steps)

  1. Declare goals, scope, and non‑malicious intent.
  2. Omit exploit paths; focus on risk models and mitigations.
  3. Direct sensitive details to vendors or approved channels. [Elektroda, Peter Owens, post #21663016]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT