possibility…

Is it possible to create a motionless generator? Is it possible to cut the flux without motion involve?

If the lines of magnetic flux cross the conductor it will generate power such as AC in an exciter and the lines of flux expanding and contracting rapidly result in a flow in the output conductor, but, you are putting in energy in the form of electricity so you really have a transformer. To generate you need mechanical force input and mechanical force dictates motion.

To put it simply - there has to be relative motion between the conductors and the magnetic field. Line of force must be transversed. Remember the basic simplied form that E = blv where B is the flux density, l is the active length of the conductor and v is velocity. Now it doesn't matter what moves but there has to be motion. You can move the field ( rotating magnetic field) or you can move the conductors. The most common method is to rotate the field, thereby limiting the current the brushes have to carry.

True WRT kinetic energy. Though it is not the only way. As long as you have stored energy which could be chemical, solar, whatever, you can use an inverter.

What if that movement is into another dimension? Then it might seem like power is generated without motion. That might be the idea behind the MEG (not sure). Also, not saying I think "scalar electromagnetics" is a reality, but can we say that all things have been identified by science?

Ahh - you used the magic word - motion ( okay - movement ). One might ask if TIME is movement? I have made the assumption that the generator was a converter - converting mechanical energy to electrical energy. You can induce a voltage if the strength of the magnetic filed changes with respect to time - so is time movement ? Motion ??

I don't think time, itself, is movement, in the same way that a direction is not movement. You can move _in a direction_ but the direction isn't the movement, Same thing with time. Time is a direction. One can move through time, but it's not the _time_ that is moving. In our reality, everything is moving through time, so when that magnetic field "changes with respect to time" it is changing in space-time, and because time is a constant, it drops out of the equation, and all you can talk about is it's movement through space.

Also, when you say the magnetic field is moving, what is causing this movement? And the other question in this scenario is, what is _generation_?

Lets begin with generation. Power generation is basically a conversion of energy from some non-electrical from to electrical (where it can be used to power electronics devices).

A moving magnetic field could be caused by an stationary electromagnet with a transitioning current, but it takes electrical energy to generate that current, so all you would have is a transfer of electric power, not a generation of it.

It could come from a permanent magnet, but if the magnet is constrained by the rule of _no motion_, then the field of the magnet would have to be modulated somehow. One way might be to heat the magnet beyond it's curie point, thus causing the magnetic field to collapse which would induce a voltage in a nearby wire(s). But, that doesn't sound very efficient. Might be useful as a sensor, though

See the Homopolar generator.

http://www.andrijar.com/homopolar/index.html

The Earth's magnetic field is understood to be generated by electric currents in flows of molten iron in the Earth's core, which makes it a generator (of sorts) with no solid moving parts.

There is also an experimental generation system for satellites, which trails a metal cable and uses the Earth's field to produce a voltage in it, so that has no moving parts within itself.

I do believe that the molten core does move - rotates with the spin of the planet - or maybe it was counter - can't remember. As for the satelite - again remember that the satelite is moving in space. So there is some tpye of relative motion