logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda

Ultrasonic Transducer 25kHz Audio Transmission Schematic With Electret Mic Receiver

237 13
ADVERTISEMENT
  • #1 21667836
    furious 555
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #2 21667837
    Rohit Dubla
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #3 21667838
    Amri Fauzan
    Anonymous  
  • #4 21667839
    Safwan RAJAB
    Anonymous  
  • #5 21667840
    Frank Bushnell
    Anonymous  
  • #6 21667841
    Safwan RAJAB
    Anonymous  
  • #7 21667842
    Rodney Green
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #8 21667843
    Safwan RAJAB
    Anonymous  
  • #9 21667844
    Frank Bushnell
    Anonymous  
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #10 21667845
    Rodney Green
    Anonymous  
  • #11 21667846
    Safwan RAJAB
    Anonymous  
  • #12 21667847
    Ruben Proost
    Anonymous  
  • #13 21667848
    Rohit Dubla
    Anonymous  
  • #14 21667849
    Rodney Green
    Anonymous  

Topic summary

✨ The discussion addresses the feasibility and design considerations for transmitting audio or music via a 25 kHz ultrasonic transducer with an electret microphone as the receiver. It is noted that ultrasonic audio transmission is challenging and generally limited to short distances (20-30 meters), requiring significant power for longer ranges. Conventional RF (FM) transmission is recommended as more practical. Suggested modulation methods include Pulse Width Modulation (PWM), Pulse Position Modulation (PPM), and Pulse Code Modulation (PCM), with PWM favored for simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Amplitude Modulation (AM) is considered less effective for ultrasonic audio. Receiver design may utilize grounded base low-noise transistor amplifiers, Gilbert Cell mixers such as the NE602/SA602, and audio quadrature phase shifters with AGC audio amplification. Historical attempts with narrowband FM and tuned LC circuits faced limited range and complexity. Alternative transmission methods like infrared are mentioned for higher fidelity audio. The importance of a pure sine wave carrier for effective transmission and reception is emphasized, especially for digital communication requiring encoding. Practical challenges include antenna size at low frequencies and interference from distant high-power stations. Overall, ultrasonic audio transmission is a niche, complex challenge with limited practical range and requires careful circuit design and modulation choice.
Generated by the language model.

FAQ

TL;DR: Expect short links: “not more than 20–30 meter” range, and PWM is the simplest path. “Do you want to go ahead?” [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667843]

Why it matters: This FAQ helps DIYers decide if 25 kHz ultrasonic audio links are workable, how to build a test rig, and what trade‑offs bite.

Quick Facts

Can I really send music over a 25 kHz ultrasonic transducer with an electret mic?

Yes, but expect very limited range and heavy directionality. Contributors reported workable links measured in meters, not rooms. PWM is suggested as the simplest modulation for a budget build, while AM was called the worst choice. If you proceed, start small and line‑of‑sight. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667841]

What range should I plan for indoors?

Plan for roughly 20–30 meters in flat, unobstructed conditions. Walls, soft furnishings, and off‑axis alignment reduce range sharply. “Not more than 20–30 meter in flat area” is a realistic expectation to start with. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667843]

Which modulation works best at 25 kHz: AM, FM, or PWM?

The consensus: use PWM for simplicity and decent results. PPM or PCM can work but add complexity. AM was described as yielding the worst results for this application at similar cost. Choose PWM to prototype quickly, then iterate. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667841]

How far did early experiments with FM over ultrasound go?

One builder using narrowband FM in the 1970s reported reception only within a few inches. The setup lacked op‑amps and used LC amplifiers and a ratio detector, highlighting how challenging low‑frequency FM is without modern parts or optics. [Elektroda, Rodney Green, post #21667842]

Could I ever reach 1 km with ultrasound?

A poster believed 1 km might be possible with reflectors at both ends and plenty of transmit power. However, another experienced user countered that 20–30 m is more realistic for practical builds. Expect heavy engineering for any long‑range goal. [Elektroda, Rodney Green, post #21667842]

What’s a simple 3‑step way to try a PWM ultrasonic audio link?

  1. Build a 25 kHz PWM transmitter and drive a suitable ultrasonic transducer.
  2. Aim a matching receive transducer at it, line‑of‑sight, a few meters away.
  3. Demodulate with a low‑noise audio chain and listen; expand distance gradually. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667841]

What are the main failure modes I should watch for?

Square‑wave carriers from PWM create strong harmonics that complicate transmission and reception. Poor filtering, off‑axis alignment, and room absorption kill SNR quickly. Consider band‑pass filtering and clean drive to limit distortion products. “ON/OFF signalling” increases harmonic trouble. [Elektroda, Rohit Dubla, post #21667848]

Is RF or infrared a better choice for sending audio?

Several contributors advised using proper RF (FM Tx/Rx) for audio links, citing efficiency and easier modulation. IR can work but needs effective amplitude control and careful encoding; otherwise dynamic range is poor. RF remains the practical path for quality audio. [Elektroda, Rohit Dubla, post #21667837]

What front‑end or demod ideas improve an ultrasonic receiver?

One approach mirrors classic radio: a low‑noise preamp into a Gilbert‑cell mixer (e.g., NE/SA602), then audio quadrature phase shifting and AGC. Add a power amp for listening. Parabolic dishes at both ends improve link budget. [Elektroda, Rodney Green, post #21667845]

How much transmitter power should I budget?

A contributor suggested using an off‑the‑shelf audio‑band power amplifier, even up to about 100 W at 25 kHz. Manage thermal limits and transducer ratings carefully to avoid damage. Directional optics (dishes) help more than brute power alone. [Elektroda, Rodney Green, post #21667845]

What is an electret microphone, and can it receive ultrasound?

An electret mic is a pre‑polarized condenser microphone capsule. Many electrets roll off above 20 kHz, so response at 25 kHz can be weak. Use a true ultrasonic receiver transducer for better sensitivity, or verify your mic’s high‑frequency response first. [Elektroda, furious 555, post #21667836]

What does PWM/PPM/PCM mean in this context?

PWM varies pulse width with the audio, PPM shifts pulse positions, and PCM digitizes audio into code words. The thread favored PWM for simplicity and cost, while noting PPM and PCM are feasible but more complex builds. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667841]

Could AM work if I insist on analog simplicity?

One expert explicitly advised against AM here, calling it the worst choice at roughly the same cost as better options. If you insist, expect lower efficiency and poorer results compared with PWM or well‑designed FM/SSB methods. [Elektroda, Safwan RAJAB, post #21667841]

Any inspiring builds or cautionary tales from low‑frequency projects?

A 22 kHz radio transmitter project struggled with enormous antenna requirements and interference from a distant 1 MW station. The builder had to reduce power to about 100 mW due to component limits. Lesson: physics punishes low carriers. [Elektroda, Rodney Green, post #21667849]

Will high‑power ultrasound bother animals?

One participant joked that kilometer‑range ultrasonic power would drive all local dogs mad. Humor aside, be considerate with ultrasonic SPLs and beam aiming, as animals detect frequencies we do not. Use minimal power needed. [Elektroda, Frank Bushnell, post #21667844]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT