>>21851594 Yes, that makes sense, only it seems to me that this calorific value is fairly constant and basically only known from the bill (with a time lag). Here it is more a question of finding some reasonably stable dependence of gas intake on some measurable quantity. If we assume that the calorific value is fairly constant, it can be ignored in the calculations. I am writing without thinking further - maybe I am wrong.
Added after 5 [minutes]: >>21851614 Have you perhaps got your eye on such a flow meter? When they replaced my meter I was thinking about a sub-meter, but I have too many concerns about that. I know blocks of flats have meters in the flats and people live with that, but I'd have this feeling that for the sake of fiddling I'm adding an extra element to the house that could be the cause of a leaking installation and life-threatening (e.g. a few extra connections + the meter itself). Somehow I feel better without it - it's not a water meter

. But maybe it's just me being oversensitive. My meter from PSG is behind the entrance gate, outside....
Added after 4 [minutes]: >>21851520 Thanks for those suggestions, I didn't know that. That's certainly a better direction than measuring voltage/current, just seeing that I'll have to get a PhD. I'm trying to analyse the topic with the furnace and AI documentation, but I don't yet know what plugs where, what I'd need to buy for that and how it would affect the ViCare, er, ViCare I mean, because I'd like that app to still work, and the Vitoconnect 100 Opto1 module occupies the only optical port. There's a separate port (two wires) for what you write, but at the moment I don't know if it's built-in or if I need to buy something extra. I'm looking into the subject - thanks!