101pawel wrote: Are you saying that when using a remote heat source, he will pay some bills for something he does not use or use?
I don't think you know the realities of living in blocks of flats, etc., buddy. Of course, a monthly subscription is paid for the connection and its maintenance by heating engineers. The same as for electricity, gas, water, sewage, etc., regardless of whether you use utilities or not.
101pawel wrote: Yes, he will be able to pour a bucket of coal once every 5 hours or once every 5 days ?!
I was more concerned with regulating the temperature in the apartment - when using my own energy source. There is a greater possibility of its regulation and thus a more economical use of funds. With all types of energy cost allocators or heat consumption meters, despite turning off the radiators, e.g. on a sunny day, they still count more or less energy consumption.
101pawel wrote: In a word, he will be able to burn himself some extra fuel at any time. Well, it's also some kind of economy.
In a word, the heating plant sometimes turns off the heating in March and sometimes in May - this is not necessarily the moment that we like.
101pawel wrote: If you wrote that you heated your apartment from a central pipe, and now you heat the same apartment with your own boiler and you get 30% cheaper, such information would have cognitive value.
Friends heated the apartment in the tenement house with their own cauldron and when they switched to the central pipe, their cost is 20% more - only that now they cannot disconnect from it.