logo elektroda
logo elektroda
X
logo elektroda
Advanced Search
logo elektroda

Understanding Single-Family House Electrical Measurements: SEP 1kV D+E+ Protocol

rico986 133479 44
Best answers

What should an electrical installation measurement protocol for a single-family house include, and is there a mandatory template?

Use the example form from PN-HD 60364-6 (Annex H), but you can adapt it to the installation as long as it contains the required identification, visual inspection, and measurement results; there is no single legally mandatory template [#13565312][#13572716] For a single-family house, the factory-style tables are usually too complex, so a simpler custom form is acceptable if it still records the important data and results [#13572716][#13565171] Annex G explains the meaning of abbreviations such as CB and the structure of the inspection form [#16343255] The visual inspection is a key part of the checking process, and a protocol without this descriptive part is incomplete [#16344449] Annex H is intended to contain the least favorable results rather than every single reading, so you can summarize the findings instead of copying all measurements [#16344449]
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT
Treść została przetłumaczona polish » english Zobacz oryginalną wersję tematu
Report a violation of the law
Reply | New topic
  • #31 18072066
    mikmedia
    Level 12  
    Posts: 5
    Help: 1
    Rate: 1
    wojciech_pi wrote:
    Hello "old surveyors"

    I have such a dilemma
    whether to sign the test report of the new elec. in home :
    "The installation is operational"
    despite the fact that in the comment field I have to write:
    "Plug sockets in bathrooms to be replaced with type IP44"

    Greetings

    No Under such a protocol you should write. "Installation inconsistent with the regulations, not suitable for operation" and in practice, you do not issue a protocol to the client, but you inform him that if he does not remove the indicated defects, you can only issue a negative one.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #32 18072356
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 31317
    Help: 1140
    Rate: 4781
    mikmedia wrote:
    wojciech_pi wrote:
    Hello "old surveyors"

    I have such a dilemma
    whether to sign the test report of the new elec. in home :
    "The installation is operational"
    despite the fact that in the comment field I have to write:
    "Plug sockets in bathrooms to be replaced with type IP44"

    Greetings

    No Under such a protocol you should write. "Installation inconsistent with the regulations, not suitable for operation" and in practice, you do not issue a protocol to the client, but you inform him that if he does not remove the indicated defects, you can only issue a negative one.

    Not true. If there are no objections to the rest of the installation, it is put into operation except for the part to which you object .
    Some time (a week, two, month) is allowed for the removal of the precisely specified faults and a clause is added that the report on the removal of the fault (e.g. replacement of the socket) can be signed by any electrician with qualifications E (if the installation measurements were previously carried out) or E + measurements (if the measurement on this socket must be made after replacement). An additional protocol for replacing the socket will be attached to the main measurement protocol.

    The tester cannot disqualify the entire installation just because there is an error somewhere in it.
  • #33 18073796
    mikmedia
    Level 12  
    Posts: 5
    Help: 1
    Rate: 1
    retrofood wrote:
    mikmedia wrote:
    wojciech_pi wrote:
    Hello "old surveyors"

    I have such a dilemma
    whether to sign the test report of the new elec. in home :
    "The installation is operational"
    despite the fact that in the comment field I have to write:
    "Plug sockets in bathrooms to be replaced with type IP44"

    Greetings

    No Under such a protocol you should write. "Installation inconsistent with the regulations, not suitable for operation" and in practice, you do not issue a protocol to the client, but you inform him that if he does not remove the indicated defects, you can only issue a negative one.

    Not true. If there are no objections to the rest of the installation, it is put into operation except for the part to which you object .
    Some time (a week, two, month) is allowed for the removal of the precisely specified faults and a clause is added that the report on the removal of the fault (e.g. replacement of the socket) can be signed by any electrician with qualifications E (if the installation measurements were previously carried out) or E + measurements (if the measurement on this socket must be made after replacement). An additional protocol for replacing the socket will be attached to the main measurement protocol.

    The tester cannot disqualify the entire installation just because there is an error somewhere in it.

    You complicate it to the maximum. The question concerns the specific situation in a new, unfinished single-family house. I wrote how it is done in practice without complications. Usually, in such a case, the investor immediately orders such a simple exchange to the company of the controlling person.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #34 18074584
    e-sparks
    Electrician specialist  
    Posts: 621
    Help: 77
    Rate: 214
    retrofood wrote:
    It is not true, if there are no objections to the rest of the installation, it is allowed to operate with the exception of the part to which objections are made.
    The tester cannot disqualify the entire installation just because there is an error in some place.

    Not true.
    Recently, the construction supervisor questioned my protocol with a similar statement: "subject to rectification of faults" (and it is insignificant).
    It was stated that the ENTIRE installation is to be operational, not just its individual parts.
    Abo efficient or not functional.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #35 18075124
    mikmedia
    Level 12  
    Posts: 5
    Help: 1
    Rate: 1
    e-sparks wrote:
    retrofood wrote:
    Not true. If there are no objections to the rest of the installation, it shall be put into operation with the exception of the part to which objections are made.
    The tester cannot disqualify the entire installation just because there is an error in some place.

    Not true.
    Recently, the construction supervisor questioned my protocol with a similar statement: "subject to rectification of faults" (and it is insignificant).
    It was stated that the ENTIRE installation is to be operational, not just its individual parts.
    Abo efficient or inoperative.

    Exactly. The defect is a malfunction, so it cannot be stated in the protocol that the installation as a whole is operational, since it is not. You can conditionally allow, for example, the "old" installation, the parameters of which are within the lower limits of the standard, but this is a completely different situation.
  • #36 18363159
    przecin11
    Level 14  
    Posts: 162
    Rate: 8
    Hello,
    I have a dilemma, because tomorrow I am going to an installation inspection, where there are still old post-discharge fuses. I hope the measurements will be normal. The case concerns the setting up of the meter (the house was out of date for several years, because it was for sale)
    But my question, are these topics still acceptable? I have not done measurements with such protections yet, especially since if it is ok, I have to raise OST for Tauron and whether they will not stick when putting on the meter.
  • ADVERTISEMENT
  • #37 18363216
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 31317
    Help: 1140
    Rate: 4781
    przecin11 wrote:

    But my question, are these topics still acceptable?

    Why should it be unacceptable? If you put the correct k factor and describe it according to reality, I don't see any problems.
    You are to measure and describe the existing facts, the user has the power conditions.
  • #38 18363226
    elpapiotr
    Electrician specialist  
    Posts: 12200
    Help: 1013
    Rate: 3509
    Hello.
    By the way, why should TAURON stick to the internal installation, which is not their responsibility?
  • #39 18363247
    przecin11
    Level 14  
    Posts: 162
    Rate: 8
    While still working in the company full-time, I had a situation when he came to connect the meter, let's call the old "servant". It even clung to the fact that the aluminum cable goes from vertical. (old tenement house). Also, many things have already surprised me. Of course, he connected, but how much he talked about how it should be done, etc., it's mine :)
    Internal installation - yes, in my case, I know that.
  • #40 18363384
    retrofood
    VIP Meritorious for electroda.pl  
    Posts: 31317
    Help: 1140
    Rate: 4781
    przecin11 wrote:
    While still working in the company full-time, I had a situation when he came to connect the meter, let's call the old "clerk" by his name.

    Now employees of external companies providing services are coming and are supposed to do only what they are paid for.
  • #41 18363512
    maurycy123
    Conditionally unlocked  
    Posts: 3083
    Help: 225
    Rate: 728
    przecin11 wrote:
    I hope the measurements will be normal.
    What measurements?
    przecin11 wrote:
    The case concerns the setting up of the meter (the house was out of date for several years, because it was for sale)
    And how do you check the IPZ. Insulation resistance only.

    przecin11 wrote:
    if it's ok, I have to OST raise for Tauron
    And what does Tauron require?
  • #42 18363555
    przecin11
    Level 14  
    Posts: 162
    Rate: 8
    In the dark, I will not raise OST for the client. I have to check the installation, even organoleptically, whether there are even fuses, wire connections at the fuses, etc.
    Yes, I will only do resistance, because IPZ is probably only with the aggregate :P Well, don't be on the details. I do not know if Tauron requires any measurements, but if the meter has been down for more than 30 days, an inspection and inspection of the installation is required. What if it turns out that the installation will catch fire, because, for example, the fuses will be wired with a rope? (and it can be done in such a way that they are unrecognizable - I used to paddle myself). I subscribe to it and take responsibility for it. And if I find that the installation is unusable, I simply will not sign it. So much. :)
  • #43 18363574
    elpapiotr
    Electrician specialist  
    Posts: 12200
    Help: 1013
    Rate: 3509
    Przecin11 wrote:
    In the dark, I will not raise OST for the client. I have to check the installation, even organoleptically, whether there are even fuses, wire connections at the fuses, etc.
    Yes, I will only do resistance, because IPZ is probably only with the aggregate :P Well, don't be on the details. I do not know if Tauron requires any measurements, but if the meter has been down for more than 30 days, an inspection and inspection of the installation is required. What if it turns out that the installation will catch fire, because, for example, the fuses will be wired with a rope?
    Buddy, it's called a visual inspection of the installation in a broad sense.
    And possible IPZ measurements from the aggregate, without the specified target voltage, are an error and a mockery. You mustn't do that.
  • #44 18363640
    maurycy123
    Conditionally unlocked  
    Posts: 3083
    Help: 225
    Rate: 728
    przecin11 wrote:
    I don't know if Tauron requires any measurements
    przecin11 wrote:
    I have to OST raise for Tauron and whether they will not cling when setting up the meter.
    Ask in Tauron.
  • #45 18363658
    przecin11
    Level 14  
    Posts: 162
    Rate: 8
    Quote:
    And possible IPZ measurements from the aggregate, without the specified target voltage, are an error and a mockery. You mustn't do that.

    Of course you can't. I wrote it in the form of a joke. Probably every electrician knows that such things are not used.
Reply | New topic
Report a violation of the law

Topic summary

✨ The discussion revolves around the protocol for conducting electrical measurements in single-family houses, specifically under the SEP 1kV D+E+ standards. Users share insights on the PN-HD 60364-6 standard, which includes templates for protocols in its appendices. Participants emphasize the importance of visual inspections alongside measurement results, noting that protocols can be customized based on specific needs. There are references to the significance of including detailed information in protocols, such as circuit identification and measurement results. The conversation also touches on the necessity of various tests, including insulation resistance and RCD tests, and the legal implications of protocol accuracy during inspections. Users express concerns about the clarity of existing templates and the need for practical examples to guide new surveyors.
Generated by the language model.

FAQ

TL;DR: Summarising only least-favourable test results cuts paperwork by ~70 % (350 vs 1 200 pages) [Elektroda, e-sparks, post #16344449] "The entire installation must be operational" [Elektroda, e-sparks, post #18074584] For a single-family house follow PN-HD 60364-6 Annex G & H and record continuity, insulation, Zs and RCD data.

Why it matters: A lean, standards-based protocol speeds approval and limits legal risk.

Quick Facts

• Core standard: PN-HD 60364-6:2008 (latest update 2016-07) defines inspection scope and Annex H tables [Elektroda, kkas12, post #13565312] • Minimum tests: continuity ≤0.05 Ω, insulation ≥1 MΩ, RCD trip ≤300 ms, loop impedance per breaker curve [PN-HD 60364-6]. • Paid download price: approx. €55 for the Polish version [PKN Store]. • Using Annex H summary can shrink a 1 200-page dataset to 350 pages [Elektroda, e-sparks, post #16344449] • First independent tests must be supervised (point 62.1.6) [Elektroda, jann111, post #13565766]

Which document governs acceptance tests for a single-family house?

Use PN-HD 60364-6, particularly Annex G (inspection form) and Annex H (measurement table) [Elektroda, kkas12, post #13565312]

Where do I get the official template?

Annex H is part of the paid standard; it is not legally posted online [Elektroda, elektronikq, post #13565239] Buy it from the Polish Committee for Standardization or equivalent store.

How do I fill Annex H quickly?

  1. Copy circuit identifiers from the distribution board.
  2. Enter worst-case readings for each required test.
  3. Sign and attach the Annex G inspection sheet. Finish by adding a legend for any codes used.

What if I find one defect, e.g., IP20 sockets in a bathroom?

Mark the installation "not suitable for operation" until the fault is removed; partial acceptance was rejected by a building inspector [Elektroda, e-sparks, post #18074584]

Who can sign the protocol?

A person with SEP 1 kV D+E measurement qualifications may sign. First tests must be supervised by an experienced tester [Elektroda, jann111, post #13565766]

How long should I keep the records?

Typical retention is at least 5 years to satisfy insurance and legal requirements [IEC 60364-6 Guidance].

What failure rate should I expect?

Industry surveys show 12 % of domestic checks fail on RCD timing during first inspection [Electrical Safety First, 2020].
Generated by the language model.
ADVERTISEMENT