Begasia wrote: better to take cable? Does it have any disadvantages?
You have to pay

.
But make sure they'll do the installation for you and connect the net !.
Begasia wrote: I noticed that cable internet is much cheaper than radio. Why is it like that?
Yes, "by peasant reason":
In the radio Internet, you have to make a "connection" to each individual (equipment, antennas, etc.), 50 clients, that's 50 "costs" of such an installation.
In cable TV, the signal goes to the block with one cable or fiber optic (the cost incurred by the company is one), and you can sell it cheaply to a larger number of customers - that is, whether their network has 20 or 200 customers in the company's expenses it makes practically no difference, the "cost" of laying the cable was the same for the company regardless of the number of customers (of course, it must pay off for them.

).
The backbone of the installation is here - just sell the service and change the servers in the headquarters to more efficient ones.
The second thing is the owner of the radio net "buys", say, a 50 Mb link and then divides it indefinitely - for a client 2345 in the queue to the network there are scraps of it.
The cable "buys" a net in GB - so when buying such a connection, they pay much less for the same 50 Mb, because they bought a net "per hectare" - you buy a lot, pay cheaper.
It's so "blatantly".