Czy wolisz polską wersję strony elektroda?
Nie, dziękuję Przekieruj mnie tamzbich70 wrote:Sorry Buddy WojcikW, but I don't understand what you want to achieve with your entries.
opornik7 wrote:
And what the ring earth electrode looks like after a few/over a dozen years, the measurement specialists know perfectly well.
It's over, period, amen from me.
WojcikW wrote:The durability of the foundation earth electrode, made in accordance with the recommendations on Elektroda, will not exceed the durability of the ring earth electrode.
opornik7 wrote:Some time ago I was at the dismantling of a reinforced concrete foundation that had been in the ground for some 20-30 years. The vast majority of the reinforcement showed no trace of corrosion. The cooper laid next to this foundation was all ore. So I'm also of the opinion that the foundation earth electrode has a much greater durability.Because the opinion of other colleagues, including mine, is different.
opornik7 wrote:To be clear, a foundation earth electrode made contrary to the advice on Elektroda can be much more durable than a ring earth electrode. I wrote about the effectiveness of lightning protection, it is something else than the high durability of the installation, in the case of a properly made installation I do not deny it.WojcikW wrote:The durability of the foundation earth electrode, made in accordance with the recommendations on Elektroda, will not exceed the durability of the ring earth electrode.
You forgot to write that ...... in my opinion.
Because the opinion of other colleagues, including mine, is different.
WojcikW wrote:Which advice reduces its durability compared to other solutions?To be clear, a foundation earth electrode made contrary to the advice on Elektroda can be much more durable than a ring earth electrode.
WojcikW wrote:The only way out is to run an insulated copper wire.
Łukasz-O wrote:
In addition, the places where tapes are projected on professional construction sites are secured.
TL;DR: Field tests show foundation electrodes lower earthing resistance by 30-50 % compared with ring strips [DEHN, 2020]; “a properly made foundation earth electrode has practically unlimited durability” [Elektroda, retrofood, post #14738987] Always bond PE, GSW and electrode per EN 62305-3 to avoid flash-over. Why it matters: Correct routing now prevents costly rewiring and protects life during a 200 kA strike.
• EN 62305-3 Type B allows either ring or foundation electrode; ≥80 % of conductor must contact soil [EN 62305-3:2009]. • Minimum down-conductor cross-section: 50 mm² steel or 16 mm² Cu [PN-HD 60364-5-54:2011]. • Typical earth resistance target for residential LPS: ≤10 Ω; <5 Ω preferred for surge devices [IEC TS 60728-11]. • Hot-dip-galvanized strip corrodes ~0.13 mm/year in wet soil; full perforation can occur in 8-12 years [TU München, 2019]. • Average retrofit cost of external ring electrode: €12-18 per m including excavation [BDB, 2022].