Protocol of periodic measurements of machines and devices - hydraulic lift.

Question

Hello. I got it for inspection - a guest from UDT crashes one and the same every two years: Quality is poor, because the client has a poor scanner.

jann111 · Answer

Any questions? The litany of errors is obvious, but apparently the power of the paper is enough.

elpapiotr · Answer

Hello. And what are the questions. Attachment included for educational purposes - that's how you write protocols!

mawerix123 · Answer

How to read it is spelled

The client went with the house receipt documents and the clerk questioned the measurement reports because she found the cables on the geodetic map, and I marked the reports with a rough font for the woman and added an appropriate note in the comments, maybe now she will find ...

As for the inserted TN-CS protocol and where PE in insulation measurements :?:

, N to the motor, 230V control voltage and measurement from three phases to N .... etc. resetting at RCD

Often protocols are picked up by people who cannot read them, only when something is happening is there more serious interest in what has been written.

Akrzy74 · Answer

This protocol is suitable for mummy, an anonymous text message with the url to the "specialist" also indicated. :lol:

Ps. So who will "point out" the protocol? Criticizing is fun, but faulting criticism will certainly gain recognition (not only mine, I think). :wink:

elpapiotr · Answer

No problem, and I see no obstacles to move it.
The customer, on the other hand, is of the opinion that the responsibility for this lies with the measurement person (paid measurements), the more so as these protocols are repeated every 2 years, with minor modifications in the details.

Łukasz-O · Answer

Sorry, but I don't know what the hell's going on:

elpapiotr · Answer

Buddy Łukasz, there are more flowers there, you have to read.

Łukasz-O · Answer

Then I would have to copy the entire protocol

elpapiotr · Answer

Why and what for? That's it. But: - date and standards - breaking current of protection (switches B) - strange, rare time of RCD tripping (in the previous protocol it was given 10 times shorter)

Łukasz-O · Answer

Because there was probably C16 on another site. The surveyor changed only to B and left the rest

elpapiotr · Answer

Probably not. I explained this in post # 6

mechatronikowiec · Answer

Unfortunately, copy / paste errors do happen, but this protocol does not differ much from other utb protocols. If you want to attach yourself to something else, the applicable standard is PN-HD 60364 and that should be changed. The frequency of measurements every 2 years is appropriate, unless special environmental conditions exist.
And of course it is not the "UDT guy cracking these protocols" but the surveyor

elpapiotr · Answer

Thank you for participating in the discussion. I close the topic.

Protocol of periodic measurements of machines and devices - hydraulic lift.

Post #1

Post #2

Post #3

Post #4

Post #5

Post #6

Post #7

Post #8

Post #9

Post #10

Post #11

Post #12

Post #13

Post #14

Topic summary