The gas does not create a carbon deposit, because it does not have ingredients that would be used to form it under favorable conditions, as it is in the case of gasoline. As no scaling is formed on the gas, the oil is able to wash away the previously deposited sediment. The fact that such deposits are formed, in my opinion, is to blame for the engine, specifically the oil sump blowing on the rings. I came to this conclusion, based on the engines in my cars, viz. My first toddler from mid-74 (Italian engine), 40,000 each km, had a compression of 11 atm, did not take oil, had a hoof that was later comparable to a meganka. The keyboard and the carburetor itself were clean.
In the second toddler, the compression was 9.4 and 9.2 atm on the new engine, the oil splashed 0.6 liters / 1000 (according to the instructions it could take up to 0.7 liters), compared to its predecessor, sludge and already 20 thousand. km the keyboard was overgrown. It was the same later with FSO1500 and Poldek, but in Poldek after gassing, the sediments disappeared and the compression returned to the one at the beginning.
Now about gasoline. The former ethiline (leaded gasoline) was better than unleaded in terms of deposit formation. An example for me is the gasoline primer, which used ethylene for about 10 years and was clean inside - no sediment. It was enough that I poured unleaded petrol once and after two days the compulsion stopped working, there was little trouble with taking it apart because it was so overgrown inside. It was impossible to rinse it out, everything had to be scraped, and not everything was accessible.
In the gassed Corolla I replaced three petrol injectors. The first one was under warranty, so I didn't see it, but the next two fell at the same time, clogged, became carbonized - now when I think about it, I suppose that the reason was that they were leaky and when working on gas they were slightly oozing and slowly overgrowing, I suppose on ethiline would not have happened.